[1-25] of 9076

Posts from Mike, NORWALK

Mike, NORWALKMike, NORWALK
Mike, Norwalk

A beginning and narrow explanation of the press' true freedom is to publish NON-biased / researched facts; and, publish such when it can.Through thesauruses I've researched, facts and propaganda aren't interchangeable under a topic of news. Actual freedom of the press is recognized through an innate responsibility to assert and defend those absolutes. The current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, with its forth branch (ecclesiastical missionaries / MSM) have no such intent, action or responsibility. That which calls itself "press" does decide for itself what to publish and when to publish it  little to none can be call truth, facts, unbiased or freedom.

Mike, Norwalk

Editor, I know you don't need defending here  what can you say to the immature and mentally ill with a god complex?

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, it is really silly that you claim to be Jesus' sole replacement with no supernaturalism associated to your being. Because there is no truth in you, your mentally ill babble does not rise to the level  radical.

Mike, Norwalk

;-) ;-) :-) Editor, You know I'm laughing uncontrollably while shaking my lowered head. The water coming from my eye and wetting my self means I'm either getting older or I'm sad ;-) ;-) ;-). Thank You  for all your many years of unparalleled diligence, labor and integrity.  Even while considering the god Sillik, you are a rare individual.

Mike, Norwalk

A caveat to my previous comment. Opinions are based on collected data. When the foundational data has nothing to do with truth (including cause and effect, the laws of nature and of nature's God vs. legal positivism, Divine reality vs. religion, etc., etc. etc.), men's differing opinions do not rise to a level of "truth and error" (opinion is based solely and uniquely on error).

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, a question; if you submit to the despotism and tyranny of government licenses (being a crime against humanity) while understanding the system, how does that make you more free (according to your kingly vision)?

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, you had me until your last sentence. Now, I can't quit uncontrollably laughing while shaking my lowered head ;-). From your kingly perch, what are you smoking to give such vision(s) 

Mike, Norwalk

JSH, your bigoted and prejudiced misinterpretation of terms and their use(s) is extremely stereotypical of a Woke bubble within an echo chamber enclave. It is absolutely accurate that the States united was to be a secular nation in harmony with "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). The occupying statist theocracy currently infesting this land has clearly established itself as the national establishment of religion. Please don't try and use a WIKI definition of religion, it is meant to rewrite history for the uniformed and gullible.

FYI, the legal use of "god" in a secular jurisprudence does not denote an extra human experience (such as acts of god for insurance purposes — it is simply a phraseology that means something that is out of control of corporeal man). 

As there are personal, social and extra human references within the decalogue, it is obvious that all of the 10 Commandants was NOT to be the premise of a jurisprudence that was to be an ancient Hebrew natural / secular law (law of nature and nature's God; not a Greek / academic / philosophical or morally based natural law or legal positivism — morality was not to be legislated) — personal sovereignty (with servant representatives thereof), inalienable rights and liberty.

Mike, Norwalk

Most opinions are formed from available data (as is more often than not antithetical to a pure knowledge of truth) Concept censorship of inalienable rights, liberty, the laws of nature and of nature's God and the nobility of the specie hides freedom so as to have an opinion thereof impossible.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, Okay  that is an overly vague statement. From your visionary perspective - please define a "corporation" in fine detail (legally, civilly, morally, structurally, operationally, socially, societal impact, historically, financial impact, etc.) as to why it should be eliminated. To whom do you assign the "our" that is qualified to make such plans. What economic tools and what law system (laws of nature and of nature's God, legal positivism, legal realism, etc.?) will be sought or used to accomplish what end? Who is the "someone" that has needs sufficiently needed to serve that corporations in America need to be eliminated. What of the needs of those outside your King's visionary "someone"? Please enlighten the rest of us with details.

Mike, Norwalk

Where men cannot freely convey their thoughts on inalienable rights, liberty, the laws of nature and of nature's God and/or justice, to one another, no concept, or an expansion thereof, is recognized.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, LOLOLOLOL - hahahahahaha; WHAT? I’ll try to help you out here a bit. A “democracy” most simply is, “majority / mob” rule (NO focus on parts of the numerical majority). A quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin may help in your understanding: “Democracy is two (2) wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Freedom is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.” Further, Lysander Spooner brought the subject matter some clarity when he said: “A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years.” The term and concept “democracy” does not address a form of law other that what the numerically superior would set forth. The term crime you use simply means contradicting what ever the entity with the most guns says. The term “crime against humanity” is an oxymoron unless the mob redefines humanity. If the mob (democracy) says murder, rape and theft are legal, then - under your definition, those parties that commit such acts are not criminals, they are qualified members in good standing in a democracy.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, you described well the Woke of the enslaving Democratic party

Mike, Norwalk

"Protection against government" ? When was that, and what protection is being spoken of here ? A "republican form of government" (Article IV, Section 4, U.S. Constitution) at "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence), guaranteeing individual sovereignty (inclusive of absolute truth), inalienable rights, liberty and justice are a compilation of intent to protect.  BUT, carnal gods, through there occupying statist theocracy infesting this land have implemented compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, social security, police state confiscations, elimination of perfected allodium / absolute ownership, etc.) AND ! ! ! malignant propagators (the press / MSM) “determine which person, which facts, which version of the facts, and which ideas shall reach the public” - all to fool an unconstitutional democracy and otherwise enslaving socialism.

Mike, Norwalk

I'm not quite sure how to rate this  my comment is; "Okay", that's nice. Justice Douglas' orthodox point of view came from a self understanding deeply entrenched in an anti—laws of nature and of nature's God (Declaration of independence) legal positivism (an elitest god can make law).

Mike, Norwalk

I like it a lot. One of the many elements of freedom and liberty is that societies are in motion, and with motion comes tension, dissent and friction. Friction, by far is NOT the "best" evidence of freedom's existence.

Mike, Norwalk

Who is Mr. Cirino's "Our", as it concerns "major mistakes". In the blame game, there is a LOT! ! ! to go around. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land uses patriarchal authority and benefits, ignorance and propaganda through sheeple's need for democracy, socialism, woke control dogmas, enslavement, etc., etc., etc. "The mass media's manipulation of public opinion" is simply an element of "democracy". By example: how often does the statist theocracy (with its ecclesiastical administrations  complete with black robed high priests / priestesses, seminaries (government schools), missionary MSM, etc.) promote individual sovereignty, personal inalienable rights, liberty, perfected allodium / absolute ownership or "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence)?

Mike, Norwalk

Brought to the forefront of today; We The People - the individual sovereigns with inalienable rights, with liberty at “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence - the intended jurisprudence of the de jure States united) suffer tyranny of/by the occupying statist theocracy that is currently infesting this land (the magistrate). The prevailing opinion (media / government induced democracy) accepts as normal, the tyranny of compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses and larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, Social Security, police state confiscations and denial of perfected allodium / absolute property ownership). Funny money inflation with the whole domain of “Woke” theocratic dogma imposes on society penalties, ideas, and practices of rules of tyranny.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, your self fabricated - ethos encompassed vision of “mentally ill” = force (either to destruction or creation, those being diametrically averse) is well, ummm?. A directed “force” may be a symptom of a type of mental illness BUT, it is NOT a definition of mental illness. Mental Illness is most often understood as an impaired, deranged or defective condition that affects mood or behavior (such as: dysphoria, illusions of grandeur, personality disorder, phobias, schizophrenia or substance abuse). Your erroneous word salad moments on this blog demonstrate a creative religion derived from mental illness. ;-)

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik — "Who, I ask, depicts the human spirit?" WHAT??? In what alternate universe of gobbledygook nonsense does anything of what you here print is understood by anyone or thing that is not highly medicated with hallucinogens and other reality altering poisons? The creator of the human spirit could answer the question for you BUT, since you've reject truth, love, the laws of nature and of nature's God, individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty, there are only degenerative delusions to pursue your quandaries. For mere earthlings from your lofty thrown, please enlighten us as to your (or your elite enclave's) finite, useful and otherwise exacting envisioned definition of "creative"; AND, the "pure human".

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, you may want to change your prescription, such erroneous and non-sensical word salad appears to be drug induced. A visional appearance of the sugar plumb fairy only appears in the singular until vision is blurred. So, what you are saying is only the blurred sugar plumb fairy can create while the singular fairy is inept. Hmmmm? 

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, thank you ! ! !  Considering the source — HIGH praise in deed! ! !  My saintly and single-minded belief is that: each individual is a noble sovereign of Eternity's King (a joint heir with Christ), that as a faculty of birth he/she exists with inalienable right(s) and a condition of liberty at "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (mercy and justice being natural elements thereof). Such fanatic idealism is written on my heart.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, no matter how you try to change meanings and understandings of concepts, terms, words, etc., you will mostly just confuse yourself. Your "other childish games", according to your word salad then includes, creation and strength being outside of ethics, morals, and social should dos.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, hahaha  lolololol, by what throned illusion of grandeur do you reign from so, that you may authoritatively accept an admission of severe mental impairment? Does an analysis by a professional define your preparation requirement?  OR  is it just your social status as omnipotent / omnipresent socialist that prospers such grace?

Mike, Norwalk

Definitions here matter. "The laws of nature and of nature's God" (the intended jurisprudence of a de jure States united) are observed throughout nature as the rules of what naturally occurs (science, gravity, math, life, liberty, etc.). Most simply, everything else that emanates from emotion, morals, ethics and NON-absolutes is religion. By example, socialism is a non-religious economic philosophy. When morals, ethics, social should dos, and/or force enters the category, socialism becomes a religion / theocracy. The quote seemed to be differentiating a formally structured gathering of like believers from those seeking ethics and morality based on the laws of nature. Where Hebrew natural law was the foundation of ethics, morals, etc.; academia's philosophical natural law has as its foundation a primary functioning of carnally interpreted ethics and morals.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.