Anonymous, homosexuality is at best a mental disorder (illness) outside the norm of the species. Under nature's law, mental illness does NOT disallow inalienable rights, interests, or ability to act. By example: the current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land promotes and proselytes homosexuality (through the 4th branch of the government {media}, government seminaries (public schools), etc.) As I mentioned above, the religious sacrament of marriage has been redefined to include homosexual associations. To your question concerning hypocrisy, women competing with men in sports or bakers having to make cakes for parties with life styles contrary to their own are infringements of rights and interests. 

Very self explanatory.

Sillik, your dictionary of redefined words / terms / concepts for mentally ill children does not alter history in either a grownup's world or absolute reality. A real socialist's plan includes elimination (in all ways and forms) of anyone that gets in the way of central planning's implementation of pain, suffering, oligarchal elitism, death, destruction of economies, increase in humanity's nobility, chaos, an orderly society and all else that is for the propagation of the species.

Sillik, you really need to write a new dictionary for mentally ill children that puts new definitions in place of accepted adult words and concepts.

Sillik, 🤪 🤪 🤪, hahahaha / lolololol — I shake my lowered head while audibly giggling in disbelief. It is only from your childish god complex that you can claim thee unique "authentic definition of the ideology". Your examples of your version of socialism (your understanding of economics, collectivism, government function, etc.) have all been tried — multiple times in multiple ways - always ending in pain, suffering, death, war, poverty, etc. When ask, you have never been able to explain through scientific method what your circular word salad means. Above, you stated: "my sincere genuineness." Was that GENUINE? Stalin, Mao, etc. were also GENUINE in torturing and murdering 10s of million of their constituents in pursuing socialism's "best solutions in the interest of human florishment." Hmmmm, I guess it was to early to know their superior god and his new made up definitions.

AND — 🤪, what is the difference between observed sincere genuineness and just plain everyday run of the mill insincere genius? I say hmmm, another circular word salad.

Sillik, 🤣🤣🤪 hahaha / lololol — WHAT? ? ?  Again, an off topic circular word salad. Why is it you can NOT stay on point. Why will you not address the well established (social, historical, legal and in all ways) definition of socialism. AND, FYI adolescent mental illness in no way equate's to any form of sincere genius — no matter what your god complex may be whispering to you.

Way, WAY more accurate than not ! The legal system, as currently perpetrated on de jure sovereign individuals is ANTI-Constitutional / ANTI-law of nature (Declaration of Independence). The entirety of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial combines to operate a completely illegitimate state. By example: an appellate court judge offered to the court a bogus Sua Sponte (of his or its own will; voluntarily) motion and then ruled on it contrary to facts and evidence. Within the "law of nature and nature's God" (Declaration of Independence), law enforcement is an oxymoron. Elected Sheriffs maintain a differing job description. A decade or so prior to the War between the States, there were no police departments in the U.S. Boston, Atlanta, New York and Philadelphia first tried out soft versions of police departments to test the public's resolve. It was held at the time that local police established a standing army to uphold foreign tyrants demands and edicts. After the war, police departments were established everywhere to implement the new tyrants theocratic dogma and interpretations. 

Sillik, your hypocrisy is almost beyond belief except for the reality thereof. The true heartfelt meaning of the word socialism, as historically, socially and legally accepted by adults is as I've written above. Your rejection of said definition is a war against maturity. Your behaviorally slapped together word definition(s) is/are a mentally ill child's play. Your off topic / misdirection / tremendous misrepresentation circular word salad(s) is/are a very immature engagement in anti-reality. Placing off topic examples to your new definitions only exacerbates the reality of your infantile adolescence. 

Government's theological "identity politics' is but one evil in a myriad of wickedness that promotes vices. Compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses, authorized larceny (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money {debt notes}, title replacement of perfected allodium, etc.) are all wicked punishments that negatively restrains individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. 

Sillik, words have meanings — and, in your words - adults accept those definitions. Your continuing nonsensical / circular word salad is extremely shallow and means nothing. As generally and historically applied, socialism is: any of various economic, religious and political theories, philosophies or movements outside nature’s law advocating collective or governmental / religious ownership and administration of property (real / chattel / sensorial beings, etc.) along with the means of production and distribution of goods. A more narrow legal definition of socialism would be; “An economic and social theory that seeks to maximize wealth and opportunity for all people through public ownership and control of industries and social services.” (West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2) You really should come up with a different name for your religion other than “Socialism”. That nomenclature - socialism - has been taken, well used and defined. Again, as a very immature expression of mental illness, you continue to reinvent useless meanings to old words.

Guessing / extracting from your many posts, I would surmise that your religious dogma (NOT law, science, fact, reality, etc.) is a mix of Marx’s philosophical theology and a distorted understanding of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau’s “Social Contract”. Such social contract held that pre-social man’s state was unwarlike and timid. Said philosophical devotees gave up individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty at nature’s law and surrendered individual freedom of action for mutual protection and socially planned production of goods, services and control of self.

Rothbard's here statement is couched from natural law. The natural law basis here is based on an accurate observation of nature's law. Natural law's accurate observation of nature's law was the founder's de jure foundation of applied application. Natural law's moral observations with applied sequence range from an exacting of nature's law to everything less than that.

OK !  I like it a lot.

Very accurate in specifics and scope. Freedom is: “The state of being free; liberty; self determination:” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st Edition);

Freedom is: “the power or liberty to order one's own actions” (Colins English Dictionary);

Freedom is: “The ability to act at liberty.” (Webster’s Dictionary)

“All men by nature are equal in that equal right that every man hath to his natural freedom, without being subjected to the will or authority of any other man; being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.” (John Locke)

“Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere.” (Franklin D. Roosevelt)

“Freedom is independence of the compulsory will of another, and in so far as it tends to exist with the freedom of all according to a universal law, it is the one sole original inborn right belonging to every man in virtue of his humanity.” (Immanuel Kant)

Freedom is an endowed expression from an inherent creation; NOT ! an abstract ethos based / outside-in to-be-controlled anomaly. Franklin here gives an observation of but a few absolutes within the full scope of freedom / liberty / inalienable rights — at nature's law.

Sillik, WHAT? ? ? Your circular word salad is once again a nonsensical / non-provable / theocratic delusion of gibberish.

🤣 Archer, way too accurate there 🤣. Sillik's holding to a delusional religious dogma without static, legal, conceptual, scientific, historical or any proof / facts is a lot ill. His descriptive god state, supported by circular word salad doesn't really give much room to navigate a substantive conversation. 😁

Using the terms freedom and democracy in the same sentence here demonstrates an oxymoron. The author's perspective derives from and, expresses a major element of freedom / liberty / rights / knowledge of nature's law LOSS. When the "American Library Association" promotes ignorance, misdirection and misinformation, it is truly a sign of a once free ideology that is now in big trouble.

Sillik, WHAT ? ? ? (I smile {almost audible 🤣 hahaha — lololol} shaking my lowered head in disbelief.) You jumped from one of your socialist gods (Lenin) to another, (Goebbels) who said: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." It is YOU who have a "total disregard for the importance of words and language". I gave socially acceptable, time proven / used and lawful definitions; AND because, proper communication is an ultimate element in exchanging ideas and concepts, words, concepts and understandings have certain static meanings. It is YOU that childishly can NOT accept the importance of words and language. Depending on the changing circumstance, your lying changes the meaning of words in language. Very, VERY immature.

An obvious caveat is govern's definition and implementation.

Sillik, your deep down, core hate and anger derive from your extremely antagonistic definitions and perceptions of freedom, liberty, rights and nature's law. Your theocratic socialism's dogmas fallaciously proclaim and declare circular word salad to be something other than what in fact, it/they is/are. You rely on mental deceptions (mental disorder / illness, empty, without merit or substance - without fact or proof) of a low IQ / very immature child (the pot calling the kettle black). The norm of your theocratic socialism’s dogma exists by calling evil good, and good evil; putting darkness for light, and light for darkness; and, putting bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.

By example: you state: “Adults accept explanations and provide them with every circumstance.” As an adult, my explanation gave an accurate definition at law and historical society’s use of freedom, liberty and right. As a mentally immature brat, you could not accept a grown-up world’s explanation, meaning, understanding or concept (AND/OR, provide a rational circumstance). You continue to have to redefine words and concepts to support your most recent lie (VERY immature). Your hallucinatory law of growth (??? NOT definable in the real world) talked to you and told you a fiction of rights and that anything outside your delusion was regressive. You really might want to check your medications or, at lest those little voices in your head.

Sillik, one reason you are a socialist is that you hate freedom, liberty and inalienable rights at law so vehemently, you can only follow admonitions of your god(s) — by example: "a lie told often enough becomes the truth" (Lenin). You continue to make up circular word salad to redefine words, terms and concepts.

FREEDOM is: “The state of being free; liberty; self determination:” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st Edition); freedom is: “the power or liberty to order one's own actions” (Colins English Dictionary); freedom is: “The ability to act at liberty.” (Webster’s Dictionary) “All men by nature are equal in that equal right that every man hath to his natural freedom, without being subjected to the will or authority of any other man; being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.” (John Locke) “Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere.” (Franklin D. Roosevelt) “Freedom is independence of the compulsory will of another, and in so far as it tends to exist with the freedom of all according to a universal law, it is the one sole original inborn right belonging to every man in virtue of his humanity.” (Immanuel Kant) Freedom is an endowed expression from an inherent creation; NOT ! an abstract ethos based / outside-in to-be-controlled anomaly.

LIBERTY is; “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Liberty is the “exemption from extraneous control. The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons. Liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st ed.). Clarifying original fact, nature’s law intent, and de jure jurisprudence: liberty is; “The condition of being free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor.” (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition.) “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” (Thomas Jefferson) “The Natural Liberty of Man is to be free from any Superior Power on Earth, and not to be under the Will or Legislative Authority of Man, but to have only the Law of Nature for his Rule.” (John Locke - second most quoted source for creation of the Constitution) “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property ⋯ and is regarded as inalienable.” (16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987). Liberty, under “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence) – nature’s law, is the state of exercising all inalienable rights. “All men are created equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; among which are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing the obtaining of happiness and safety.” (George Mason) “So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.” (James 2:12) For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.” (Galatians 5:16) “Where liberty is, there is my country” (Benjamin Franklin).

A “right”; is an eternally actionable warrant that, intrinsically facilitates a most base particle’s just mechanics and/or performance. Right(s) is an inherent, inviolate, just and omnipresent component / factor / attribute, composing matter’s structure of expression - bonding / sealing the “be” to the “be” and to the “do” (law existing as the ultimate and final definition: “do”). Right(s) is/are an intricate constituent in/at matter’s ability to self express (without right(s), matter of any size or configuration could not express itself). Expanded to organized matter (the Eternal King’s priesthood creation), a right is a single being’s just ability to commit any act that does not infringe on another’s right or justice. Though differing particles may vary or not conform, the “right(s)” intrinsic thereto remains the same.

Most simply, nature’s law (the do) expresses matter’s (the be) elocutions. Freedom and liberty are definitions at law and rights are more closely associated with justice (none can be earned - THEY JUST ARE ! ! !

I like it a lot. Poetically and in reality accurate.

“While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. ” (2 Peter 2:19) “Therefore thus saith the Lord; Ye have not hearkened unto me, in proclaiming liberty, every one to his brother, and every man to his neighbour:” (Jeremiah 34:17)

The minimum restrictions would be applied justice in the positive; NOT a lessoning of inalienable rights or liberty at nature's law.

Liberty is a measurement at / in nature's law. Law is a tangible’s applied static measurement within a domain of absolutes (biology, chemistry, physics / science, fiscal / economics, gravity, math, magnetics, life, liberty, rights, etc. Who or what is that standard maker that places an abstract worth value to law (and/or "liberty" a subcomponent thereof)? What nexus compares worth or ties liberty to a country? The only real accurate clause in this quote is that where liberty is, there IS/are also acknowledged rights (that exist inalienably).