Mr Archer, you might notice, I hold no designs on any great office or title or possess any, I'm just the voice of democracy and social responsibility, yet I'm more effective than all the presidents, chairman, kings, queens, princes or princesses, emperors put together.  

We need a national transport rail system put into place where we transport around cities and between cities on rail, light rail in the cities, heavy rail between cities.  The trains themselves stocked with goods and services so you can both enjoy journeying and accomplishing day to day tasks at the same time.   

We need a national housing project with everyone living in the same basic sheltering guidelines. No individual is afforded or according anymore valued living quarters than anyone else. You just might find yourself living right next door to Bill Gates or Warren Buffet and this shouldn't be the least surprising to either one of you if the appropriate information guidelines are put in place. 

Mike,, Norwalk, anyone that would put any stock in any drugs, prescription or otherwise, has a vested evil misguided investment in the drug trade. Your writings are clearly evidence and evident that when and your buddies went and got "wasted," you certainly succeeded. Eliminate the drug and sex trades. 

l'm sorry, Mr Archer, but the drug and sex producing conventional individual believes they are the "producers" and  individuals like me who want nothing to do with either are worthless. the sentiment of both you and Mike. That's what. 

Mr Archer, sorry, very sorry to say, you completely missed the point of my post in this reply. 

Mr Bastiat, Mr Archer, is a competitor like you. I'm in no contest of superiority. My role is to grow into the appropriateness of a human being.  Narcissistic individuals don't grow, humans grow, mature, develop become better then they were the previous day or previous moment.  

No, Mr Archer, Mike, Norwalk, I seek accountability in my own personal behavior, and I require you fellows to be accountable for your behavior before I call you friend. You both throw a bunch of pointless writing at me for some kind "fun," neither of you have any real desire to learn and grow from the experience. I write and speak because that is the very essence of the evidential sign of growth in the individual, I want to be come better, get passed my past errors, and move on.  My writing grows as I grow. 

To fully plan and align your roles as friend, confidante, Mr Archer, are a danger to you? To require everyone to explain your theory of husband of wife before assuming these roles, this is recklessness?  Recklessness has been the order of the day by the conventional individuals in regard to the behavior, leaving infants in train stations, murdering their mating competition.  My relations better understand the appropriateness of the behavior before they are my relations  

Mr Archer, you can plan out the husband and father roles appropriately(social engineering) in your life, its essential. 

No Mr Archer, I have clear goal oriented visions of appropriate behavior in our relations. For instance I'm not interested in the sexual performance of a prospective wife, but her emotional investments in the relations as a wife. What is her ideas of being a good wife? I interested in a young lady's ideas of being a good mother. What are her theories of both roles. I have my ideas own ideas of the role of an appropriate husband role.  Did Hitler or even you yourself offer contributions of these very precious roles? 

I'm not misdirecting anything, drugs and sex are the base products in this conventional arrangement, and I reject both. I am unconventional.  The conventional society makes their way with primarily violence(sex and drugs and related strategies), again I reject it,  I am not violent and again not conventional. 

Mike, Norwalk, not to sure what you're stating in your respective post, but would just like to assert that I try to practice the very substantive exercise of logical reasoning. 

Mike, Norwalk, don't understand what you're writing, but would like to add to the dictionary in that the identifying principle of religion is based on fictional characteristics, while science's identifying principle is fact finding, science is the course to which I subscribe. 

Suggest emphasis concern should be placed on organizing ourselves to better relate to those not so well organized. 

I would be interested in a description of this vision that Mr Clyburn is planning to whip on us. 

We must use our abilities to reason, for the arrival at the best course of action for all involved. 

Mr Archer, I wish I could change the subject, when I've conducted conveyances with the conventional individual it always arrives at, not the destination I'm looking positive productiveness, but some insidious Freudian sicko ulterior  perverted stopover. We need an alternative wholesome productiveness. 

Mike, Norwalk, I am not religious, I am principled. 

The priority is responsibility,  Mike, Norwalk, we receive freedom as a result of responsible behavioral earnings, we are not necessarily responsible because of some anointed freedom.   No one grants us freedom, or more precisely privileges, we earn them. 

Socialism, Mr Archer, explores deep into the very facets of our relations.  We find we don't need violence, but the complexity of life sometimes takes across the border into  violence.  We are limited as humans, we fall into the traps. There's absolutely no need for violence ever, but our limited abilities often lead us astray, take us beyond our experiences and intuitive threshold. We must continue however to learn to become less and less violent. We are not perfect, but must continual persistent nonviolent behavior.    

Your right Mr Archer, I won't accept the fact that human beings are just a bunch of bums destined to fail, that we're just a bunch of losers, no way.  We are a "promising species," waiting for that vital climactic moment of reconciliation. 

Well, Mr Archer, there has to be a plausible solution to paying back the national debt, possibly implementing a credit system where you receive credit for your efforts on a credited card used for purchases. l will not accept that we can't pay back the national debt, that as you assert, that it is "unpayable."  Paying the national debt can indeed be accomplished and will be accomplished by the united citizenry of the United States of America. I believe it basically entails raising the Gross Domestic Product.  We also, are at an urgent necessity to improve behavioral and communication skills. 

No such implication of some more equal than others from this humble fellow, not at all Mr Archer, the correct explained formulation leads, so its vitally important to allow the correct explainer and their explanation have the podium. I will never deny you the podium, Mr Archer, but your irrationality and illness, at this juncture, will have to force us to a rational and healthy speaker untill your health is more developed. 

Mr Archer, Socialists do not riot, they organize, they rationalize, they fully explain their reasonable objectives and fair motivations.  Social engineering is the pinnacle of human activity. To plan out our lives with precision is what makes the human a beautiful adaptation to the natural environment.  Socialism solutions stem from the fair distribution of resources.