If I understand this correctly this Chinese fellow is describing the existing practices of the majority of individuals on this planet. Agreed.

This is a childish subjective nonsensical display. Sanity is an objective status as plain as left or right, day or night, black or white. The child lives is a biased, selfish, self-centered, make believe world where they uncritical perceive themselves as the center of the universe. For the mentally healthy sane adult the case is the reversed.

The real pertinent question is: can I get a woman?

PS Mike Norwalk, you appear to have spelled my last name wrong.  An obvious attempt to "prove" that I'm the one who lives in the world of delusions.

Mike, Norwalk I thought God kinda looked and acted like George Burns, but it just  turned out to be George Burns just acting. Curses, curses fooled again. Drat, drat, drat.

I humbly apologize but my limitations can only interrupt this quote as an insubstantial pointless nonsensical waste of my time. I guess I'll never be a Heisman trophy winner or Noble prize winner like whatever the title this fellow possesses. Whatever the differences of the two "prizes" I'm not sure, for they both appear to employ the same violent political strategies.

Shouldn't we be a principled being?

Is not the authentic man a bastion, paragon, the living fortification of moral authority and expression?

God, in America, can have his day in court, just like everyone should have to prove their position. Again, I call for God, to be subpoenaed. I feel like I keep on repeating myself.

The divided States of America? 

Is this not divisiveness? Shouldn't the states categorizing be established to keep secure, but not oppressive, tabulations on the members of our country? Shouldn't we be prepared for any catastrophic disaster or just normal operations of our country through delegates and delegation of responsibility to the respective states, but acknowledging a whole collective connectionness?

This is all of nothing. This "social" arrangement is just a primitive creature fighting for territorial supremacy. There's no legislation, no official rights, no ethical agreements. Just plain ole, everyday, low life bullying violence. Humans, on the other hand, are responsible, respectful, and fair. We need a human administration.

Yes, definitely, Mike Norwalk. We are the world, we are the adults.

Mike Norwalk, to be social cannot possibly lead to mental illness. It's being antisocial that makes individuals ill, the present state of affairs in our contemporary world. To be social, in essence to be different, a Socialist is to be kind, fair, caring and considerate 

Correction: first sentence needs a  ?

Are attributes of subservience enjoyed by every state in the "Union." Can you have one without the other?

This is an address for what would happen if the United States ever became disunited? Didn't that ship sail off with it's inauguration? Wouldn't it be more fitting to have an address to prepare us for what may occur if the United States of America ever United?

There is no uniting politically, but when you unite socially you are one, and one with the universe. You are separate physically, independent mentally, but never emotionally, sentimentally, or morally.  You love and are loved.

Is this just another example of the bi-polar condition from which our national community arrangement suffers, by having no clear distinguishing absolute social feature in which to draw a conclusive directional moral compass?

Should we not confer a national union of our country's communal processes with the explicit goal of an international unification with all of the territories of the planet earth for peaceful and developmental purposes?

To have a break-away attitude is a child's attitude. The mature adult has the attitude of continual construction and building a more solidified organization and community strategy.  Don't break it apart, hold it together, therefore guided by justified reason to hold it together. Eliminate the disease, hold on to the healthy aspects. 

Is it not all of our duty as citizens to inform all members of the citizenry, whatever their position, of the past societal conflicts, and present the proper evidence of the need for the appropriate harmonizing changes?

Don't you think it would be convenient to have some substantive, inspirational directions at some periods?

Doesn't the conventional individual believe their duty is to unquestionably obey conventional authority, majorities, influences,  and opinions?

I would have to say I am a government supporter. My observations have revealed to me that these competing interests have lead the conventional population to lose of independence of thought and action.  This supporter believe that actions/activities should be proven with scientific supporting evidence or they have absolutely no support for being practiced in these here United States of America. This is the government of Science and of Artistry.