Sillik, the answer to your questions is NO ! ! ! Your perception of children, adults and the mentally ill is very / VERY  skewed. Knowledge and understanding definitively explains that Socialism is a vision of social abilities to create chaos, poverty, pain, violence, death; AND a loss of personal sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law.

NO ! ! ! Force by any measurement is despotism. Social force is slavery. "moral force" is an oxymoron. Enforcement of slavery is never innocent.

Sillik, are you suggesting indoctrination as is opposed to education. Theocratic socialist do NOT tolerate reason. Once liberated from socialism's theocratic mental illness, they may begin to enjoy the solution of 4, for the equation of 2 + 2.

Of course there are exceptions — BUT — very well said as a general overview.

The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, in its ecclesiastical seminaries is now advancing dogmas of Moloch, mental illness based on sexual perversion, the pleasures of child abuse, the religious and otherwise benefit of being an helot, surf or slave of socialism, war and violence are preferable to peace and a hatred for personal sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Such depravations replace true history, math, science, reading and rational thought.

Sillik, the non-conspiracy individuals are those that oppose the mental illness and enslavement of socialism, totalitarianism, the patrons of Moloch and all that is contrary to nature's law.

Sillik, only from a position of extreme bigotry, ignorance and shallow dogma can your statement have been made. There is "law" (chemistry, physics / science, gravity, math, life, liberty, etc.), "philosophy of law" (natural law, legal positivism, admiralty law, etc.) and there is religion (a sacrosanct object of conscience (an ethic(s), a moral(s), a value (system) or an orientation of correctness / enlightenment) believed sufficiently conventional as to enable an attributable action).

For the spiritually dead (maintaining a minimal of the light of Christ within them) the legal use of the term "god" (Jesus the Christ, a certain Buddha level, the devil, etc.) means a thing or event (rem & res) out side man's control such as, which way the wind blows (& outside nature's law secular jurisdiction). So, as to your ignorant question, the answer is NO documented cases. The FBI, CIA and local standing armies — being corporate offices / officers in toto aloof from We The People (police) are deception experts that would not expose their ultimate master (even if it were legally possible, and it is not). AND by psychiatric treatment, you probably mean indoctrination centers. A blaring example of the devil’s finest trick - that is, to persuade socialists and other mentally ill to not believe in his existence and corporeal man’s eternal and noble status - thus, justifying man’s inhumanity to man.

Sillik, in your here generalized opinion; what is the best possible direction? What is the interest of "all" vs. the "individual's" interest in advancing the principles of nature's law? Not being ruled by our biases (such as socialism's version of slavery) is a good thing if love, truth, personal sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty at nature's law; AND, the removal of such idolatrous applications such as compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses and larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, replacement of perfected allodium with title, police state confiscations, funny money / debt notes, etc.). 

Such an accurate insight. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land defuses well the existence of its/their master. The patrons of Moloch (child mutilation, sacrifice and other heinous abuses — another iteration of said evil one), those who transmit and otherwise advance destructive social diseases such as socialism and all those that are substantively antithetical to the law of nature's individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty are ultimately those that worship at the alter of the supreme adversary — the devil.

As to the reference to the Constitution in the statement — there is very, VERY little resemblance to the nature's law Constitution (as was written and intended) and the current immoral / unlawful / carnal god oligarchy's tyranny / government that now exists. That being said, the U.N. is still a head of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land in advancing down the rabbit hole a destruction of/to personal sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty.

Okay — probably a little over generalized to make the point. Though my personal belief is that the general military (outside local combatants) are individually among the best the country has to offer — I'm sure there is not one in ten thousand that can explain individual sovereignty, inalienable rights or liberty from a "law of nature and of nature's law" (Declaration of Independence) perspective.  I REALLY ! ! ! hope I'm wrong here.

If you desire social justice, you need to acknowledge your need for psychiatric treatments. The individual of reason acknowledges justice is an individual domain of action.

NO ! ! !  "Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Freedom is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." (attributed to Benjamin Franklin) Democracy isn't a positive anything (unless of course you are looking to progress poverty, death, destruction and tyranny). Social mechanisms only discover that which is antithetical to personal sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law.

"What was so great prior to 1860?" ? ? ?  Though there were many political ills with some slaves. Now, the second plank to the communist manifesto has made everyone slaves. Prior to 1860 there were no local standing armies enforcing compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses and government larceny with impunity. Prior to 1860 it was not a crime to participate in commerce — conducting private business, the religious sacrament of marriage was not a crime, transporting oneself on the highways was not a crime, religion wasn't legislate by such carnal god / law makers, etc., etc., etc.

My sense of "Liberty" that you think is so warped is: Liberty is; “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Liberty is the “exemption from extraneous control.  The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons.  Liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st ed.). Clarifying original fact, nature’s law intent, and de jure jurisprudence: “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” (Thomas Jefferson) “The Natural Liberty of Man is to be free from any Superior Power on Earth, and not to be under the Will or Legislative Authority of Man, but to have only the Law of Nature for his Rule.” (John Locke - second most quoted source for creation of the Constitution) “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property ⋯ and is regarded as inalienable.” (16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987). Liberty, under “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence) – nature’s law, is the state of exercising all inalienable rights. “All men are created equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; among which are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing the obtaining of happiness and safety.” (George Mason) “So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.” (James 2:12)

NO ! ! !  The continuation of a nation will depend on positive perspectives and views of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law; — AND, recognizing that there are no "leaders" in a "safe" nation, there are only servants, representing individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, and liberty at nature's law.

YES ! ! !  That means those that choose individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and freedom at nature's law the — the level of supporting and protecting will be fatiguing. Every socialist, woke theologian and other malefactor that has chosen the chains of enslavement, death, pain and destruction work incessantly with lies and deception to take away such nobility of man. 

Absolutely, with a caveat. The ideals of building a country on the eternal nobility of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law is a life's endeavor. The occupying statist theocracy currently infesting this land is not the same country that is here referenced

It would really depend on those that are creating the definition and standard of what mental health is. The theocratic patrons of socialism live and promote a dogma that is within the realm of mental illness — being oppressed by honesty and integrity; and antithetical to loyalty and devotion to individual sovereignty, inalienable right, liberty, the laws of nature, justice, love and truth.

NO ! ! !

Waffler, once again you manifest one of your god's favorite sayings: "A lie told often enough becomes the truth." (Lenin) Capitalism by definition, is a laissez-faire accumulation of excess money (a tangible entity with intrinsic value like gold or silver coin) used to increase wealth. A debt system can NOT participate in a capitalist system — only Marxist "crony capitalism" can. Marx coined a new definition to base his reasoned theocratic enslavement (Marx needed a boogyman). Waffler, you who hate individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law in favor of Marxist enslavement are a very twisted and deranged individual.

It can

The problems you have mentioned all deal with an unconstitutional theocracy that has no semblance to the de jure jurisprudence (''the laws of nature and of nature's God {Declaration of Independence}) A vote under Constitutional authority and principle ONLY chooses how to administer rights and liberty at nature's law — NOT — choosing a new slave master. In the socialistic based, statist theocracy now infesting this land, carnal gods are called law makers and, law enforcement officers compel tyranny. Each and every scenario you painted has extreme merit and is very accurate while, speeding up the destruction of individual sovereignty, inalienable right, liberty and the nation that was once a beacon of light on a hill to such. The current "INVASION" is just another element being played out in a socialist theocracy to destroy that once beacon of light.

The current problems with immigration are all due to the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land and its/their unconstitutional activities. By example;

1.) The Constitution does not authorize the federal government to address immigration (only nationalization = becoming a citizen). Immigration is left to State jurisdictions.

2.) Socialism's economic aspects are only capable of destroying a nation's economy. Over-taxing the productive elements of a group (financing ecclesiastical seminaries / public schools, creating a massive welfare class / state, adding a mindset of social security, inflating funny money, etc.) are all exacerbated when the State (foreign to We The People's individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty at the laws of nature) entices new-comers to an already over bloated unconstitutional system.

In a nature's natural assimilation, Washington was correct.

Sillik, more often than not it is the armies and police that instigate force of destruction. By way of existence, socialism indoctrinates rather than educates — all instruction and learning are not equal. Socialism is anti-the noble human's traits and being / individual sovereignty, nature's law, inalienable rights, liberty and free and independent will.

There have been several waves (some more intense than others) of socialism (communism, fascism, woke, etc.) directed at the States united. The founders rejected Europe's initial indoctrination in favor of an experiment to secure individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at law. In the early 1800s Germany developed a PhD status for academia. Socialism was part of the required curriculum. Then differing socialist affiliations paid for the most promising professors of ivy-league colleges, mostly focusing on the north. (about this time U.K. groups also paid for U.S. academics to study in Germany).

Such influence on academia and politicians was a prime causation of the War Between the States. There were no local policing offices in the de jure States united prior to the War Between the States except for a few experiments (New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Atlanta by example). We The People feared a local military enforcing the will of a distant few. Sheriffs were to be the head executive as agents of justice (NOT law enforcement). After the War between the States, local military (police) were established to enforce the socialist based anti-freedom laws of tyrants tyranny.

President Wilson, with his socialist minions implemented the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money / debt notes, and the ground work for the — to come Social Security. Rosevelt implemented a replacement mindset of the individual being responsible for caring for one's own existence to relying on the new god — government. I could go on and on and on etc. but, suffice it to saw - the wars that the U.S. has participated in were not for what they were advertised. The new Woke theology is just another socialist face to extinguish individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at law.