[1-25] of 9243

Posts from Mike, Norwalk

Mike, NorwalkMike, Norwalk
Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, I understand how an individual may understand, how does an inorganic phantasm without senses understand? That is a false dichotomy. Within nature's law, what is a government (inorganic phantasm) other than a title given to individual employees who work for sentient sovereigns in preserving their personal inalienable rights and liberty? Limiting the scope of defined actions and power - permitted by individual sentient sovereigns within nature's law, is the only proven way to ensure a free voice.

Mike, Norwalk

Communal orders, such as the many administrative faces of socialism can only enslave the individual by their/its very nature. Things ordered outside nature's law for sentient sovereigns' individual inalienable rights and liberty is a heinous religion of mentally ill deviants.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler  "State capitalism" is an oxymoron. Pure capitalism is a fiscal extension of individual sentient beings. Capitalism is in toto aloof from any system of debt (like, funny money). Capitalism is a financial scenario that deals with tangibilities (such as gold and silver coin) and the excess gained through personal labor. Capitalism describes the right and liberty of the sentient being to spend the excess representation of his labors any way he desires. Actions that use terms such as "profit" - misdirect, misuse and steal under similar nomenclature (crony capitalism, by example).

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, your childish religion does not / can not exceed nature's fiscal law (and in fact, antithetical thereto). Because you like to define things contrary to reality and established meanings, please illuminate us with your vision / definition of capitalism. AND by "educated" do you mean those that are thoroughly indoctrinated into Sillik religious dogma. Each and every, any and all socialistic attempts to own and control people  along with distribution of goods and services has failed miserably ! ! !  (such lunacy is the illness of the simple minded (educated beings)).

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, contrary to your primary religious ideology - the abiding or worshiping tenets of socialism, Moloch or a carnal god dogma does not bring about blessings of the state or masses and in no way equates to happiness. 

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, I smile while shaking my bowed head, My definition of "socialism" is spot on and to the point. Your religious add on is a dystopian view too broad to give any credence. Also, your religious add on to reality's hard fact  what socialism is, is distorted, inaccurate, a misdirection and a lie only the mentally ill can dream.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, you are a liar, socialism has a definition other that what you are trying to deceive with. Socialism only destroys  unless that is what you call creation (you are really twisted).

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, you are a liar. What people specifically do you say I worship? When did I ever refer anything concerning enslaving anyone or as "geniuses" by people I worship? What have I said concerning black people that would refer to any table? It is you that just called black people unreasonable baboons.

Mike, Norwalk

The mild voice of reason, pleading the cause of inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law is too often drowned by the patrons of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land. Clamors of an impatient avidity, such as by Moloch adherents with their human sacrifices and body mutilations for anti-nature's law and immoral immediate / immoderate perceived gains — pleads the cause of an enlarged and permanent destruction.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, socialism is any of various theories or systems of communal organization at which its theocratic ideology reigns supreme, where all property (real, chattel, people, etc.), the production - distribution of goods and services and the means thereof is/are owned and controlled collectively or by a centralized government that is also active in planing the economy. Any other delusion of socialism is a lie meant to deceive and enslave. AND!  truth does not project itself as a lie (of socialism or otherwise) Socialism, in ALL it many forms destroys, it does not create.

Mike, Norwalk

Archer, Sillik is not only delusional, he is a liar and tyrant also.

Mike, Norwalk

Socialists and otherwise patrons of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land are the bastards of Stilwell's focus. Such declare they have neither a natural father or mother but are born of/to the community. I repeat the sentiment, don't let the bastards grind you down.

Mike, Norwalk

(-; ,  (-; , (-;  too, TOO accurate ;-) ,  ;-) , ;-)

Mike, Norwalk

Archer, extremely well said with no corrections being applicable.

Mike, Norwalk

NATURE'S LAW is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first object. The will of the people is only a fleeting phantasm.

Mike, Norwalk

The most recent choice demonstrated divisive clouds of Marxist socialism is a festering growth. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, with its enslaved socialists and otherwise immoral patrons share no belief in freedom. Funny money's devastating effect on inalienable rights, liberty, charity, peace and prosperity is but one issue in an innumerable quiver of death's tools to kill freedom by promoting socialism.

Mike, Norwalk

Another of Sillik's gods that doesn't play while creating. It is amazing how socialists of all administrations parrot the same concepts and words.

Mike, Norwalk

I like it a lot. The narrowly focused observation is a good beginning list of a broader overall topic. A more complete and substantive observation would commence with true spiritual growth (associated intellectual growth would then follow).

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, why must "we" become a community based organism  for any reason ? ? ? That anti-law / theocracy sentiment has been pushed ad nauseam to only end in pain, poverty, destruction and death. It all sounds pretty in its shallow presentation while, there is nothing more ugly to the existence of the noble being man. Individual sovereigns united - abiding nature's law, acting with charity in their personal hearts is the only proven scenario that will lead to the utopia you allude to. Socialism is an enslaving standard that mandates new lows.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, your attempting to thread a very small fiber of accuracy through an entire tapestry of lies is deplorable and wrong. NO ! ! ! socialist wants to or, excepts truth as it exists. The socialist wants everyone to understand a lie as the truth, slavery as liberty, evil as good, bitter as sweet, pain as pleasure, war as peace and that which is anti-law to be lawful. Socialism's inherent brutality has exercised the greatest pain, suffering, poverty and death — exceeding all other religions, in each and every of its applied applications. Science, in every experiment, application and societal arrangement has PROVED — Socialism is an illumination of illnesses such as masochism, sadism, self aggrandizement, psychotic disorders of all types and illegal perversions in general.

Mike, Norwalk

Religion is: a sacrosanct object of conscience (an ethic(s), a moral(s), a value (system) or an orientation of correctness / enlightenment) believed sufficiently conventional as to enable an attributable action(s). Religion’s initiating elements of conscience, through fruition of action, encompasses self-obligated pursuits, imperative practices and devoted interests. When such enabling fundamentals are drawn upon or referenced as authority, power, reason or logic to exert specific actions (ordinances, rules, statutes, a mandated action, etc.), a formal religion is established. A ‘god’, ‘causation’ or other ‘relegated source’ of such enabling elements may or may not be instrumental (or even useful) in defining religion.

Religion is: “ real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to God and our fellow men.” (Bouviers Law Dictionary) This definition’s focus is on “real piety in practice” - and - “the performance of all known duties” - again, a sacrosanct object of conscience believed sufficiently conventional as to enable attributable actions. The here definition utilizes a very limited list, focusing on who and what religion is directed to (God and fellow man), leaving an incomplete picture of a much more extensive list. The extremely terse list derived from and, was directed to jurisdictional specific norms of a post Jesus Christianity template - a Christian society’s self measure of differing religious persuasions. Such definition is loosely incidental to a lawfully measurable application of an otherwise equitably principled Luke 10:27 “⋯, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.” This definition’s usefulness for lawfully administrative purposes may limit in scope, religion’s full domain. Not all religious duties, practices or beliefs (religion) assume, attach, or include an extra-human experience or a duty to our fellow man. It is however a useful starting place to understand religion’s more inclusive and lawfully exhaustive application(s).

The concept of a god is but an indicating element, category, or tenant that may or may not be useful in revealing or identifying religion. For example; A concept of, or the word ‘God’ never developed in the Hebrew covenant society (there being only a sacred relationship between Father and child - ‘el’ being a powerful executor: i.e. a mayor, a governor, a demon, a person of strength such as Sampson, etc.) and was only adapted by forces and influences outside the covenant experience. As such, Jesus, by carnal understandings and use, is a God to Christians while not being a god to other belief systems or religions, even though His teachings are honored as good and His secular laws are recognized as a founding jurisprudence (gravity, science, physics, fiscal law, life, liberty and property / “the laws of nature and of nature’s God”). Another perceptual scenario is, an individual can believe that a god exists but that tenet does not play a role in the individual’s actual religion, for example: “⋯ believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.” (James 2:19) Here, those parties (devils and corporeal individuals) that believe in the existence of a singular God, do not have any conscientious regard, ethical motivation, moral involvement, piety in practice or pursuit of any duties attributable to said God, do not believe or practice His teachings, His philosophies, and do not perform any foundationally or otherwise related acts or ordinances, etc., etc. The religious experiences and expressions of such James 2:19 person evinces an individual (personally or in concert), effectively and in toto, foreign to the extra human existence (god). Believing there to be a god, or even the possibility of a god, (agnostic for example) may, or may not be useful as a determining factor in defining one’s religion. Practices and performances such as ordinances and worship (rendered adoration, honor and homage by service, meeting, praising or otherwise) are things added to an existing religion to enhance or complete the religious experience and may or may not be helpful in defining religion itself.

Webster's New World Dictionary - Fourth College Edition uses a slightly different vantage on Bouvier’s “fellow men” by stating, Religion is:
“a) any specific system of belief and worship, often involving a code of ethics and a philosophy [the Christian religion, the Buddhist religion, etc.]
b) any system of beliefs, practices, ethical values, etc. resembling, suggestive of, or likened to such a system [humanism as a religion] ⋯ any object of conscientious regard and pursuit”

Religion is then, the conscientious regard and pursuit, based on a motivating object of ethical, moral, values, conscience or correctness - enlightenment orientation. Not the belief specifically but, the pursuing systemic actions that follow. By way of example: One may believe that seasons change as a course of natural law. It is when that individual believes there to be a moral obligation in pursing systemic actions relating to the change does ‘religion’ come to be. Pursuits and natural law with justice as a result differ from religion where pursuits are based on a sacrosanct object of conscience (an ethic(s), a moral(s), a value (system) or an orientation of correctness / enlightenment) believed sufficiently conventional as to enable an attributable action(s). By way of example: happiness is not lawfully an inalienable right while, the “Pursuit of Happiness” when made a quest based on belief of moral, ethical, conscience, value or correctness - enlightenment grounds, defines an individual’s religion. (Pursuit of Happiness at law is a locution of self, undaunted and not addressed by ethics, morals, conscience, value or correctness - enlightenment; an inalienable right to exercise and harmonize with the law. Pursuit of Happiness as a religious practice or pursuit is a lawful extension of inalienable right(s)).

Each arbitrary rule defining carnal man’s will outside nature’s law, taking on a moral, ethical or correctness perception (compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licensing, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, police state confiscations, etc.) enters the category religion / theocracy. By way of illustration: “⋯ Socialism is a religion. All we lack is a religious genius capable of uprooting outmoded religious practices and putting new ones in their place. We lack traditions and ritual. One day soon National Socialism will be the religion of all Germans. My Party is my church, and I believe I serve the Lord best if I do his will, and liberate my oppressed people from the fetters of slavery. That is my gospel.” (Joseph Goebbels Diary entry for October 16, 1928) John Adams here subject matter; “The blackest billingsgate, the most ungentlemanly insolence, the most yahooish brutality is patiently endured, countenanced, propagated, and applauded” is best fulfilled by socialism.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, let pragmatism be our guide? ? ? By the comment that followed your opening intentionally false deception, instead of pragmatism - you would have been accurate if you said “demonically enforced slavery”. Waffler, your theocratic dogma is an absolute socialistic lie ab initio. Wealth’s definition, does NOT !!! rely on a producer’s abundance or lack thereof. Your socialist need to change definitions, do a misdirection and focus on an off topic is blatantly obvious here. Wealth, by any legal or otherwise understanding / definition would be, goods or resources that have an exchange value, NO MATTER the source. Under nature’s fiscal law, wealth (of the rich, poor, sovereign, multiple of individuals in recognized groupings, etc.) is a tangible measure that will be eventually destroyed by any/all forms of socialism / piracy / legal or illegal plunder (communism, fascism, wokeism, Marxism, theocratic collective think, etc.). Waffler, as a socialist norm, you also misappropriate - by exchanging the independent concepts, power and rich. Your socialistic occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, with its immoral plunder mongers - exercising the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto is a great example of anti-law government actions. Your reference to lower class is an anti-nature's law - systematic dogma eternally fomenting anger, poverty, pain, conflict, disunity, slavery, lies and war. Waffler, larceny is an anti-lawful act against wealth, whether it be by government directly, organized pirates such as Somali pirates / the IRS / the Federal Reserve or by non-government sanctioned illicit actors.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, I have a good friend that was living over seas when working as an investment banker. He was brought to the U.S. and without as much as a grand jury or trial, he spent 5 years in prison. While there, he was beaten by guards and to this day does not walk well because of the abuse suffered there. Waffler, I could go on and on but it is not in my best interest to do so.

Mike, Norwalk

I won't give a name for fear of retribution against the family. I had friends (married in the early 60s with all children moved away) that exercised daily, ate healthy and were very active protesting against the second plank of the communist manifesto. One day, a daughter went to her parents home and it was completely cleaned out (floors cleaned, walls washed, garage power washed, etc.) About a week before that, I was discussing with the couple their latest medical check-ups (they were very healthy with no problems). The daughter had found out that her parents were taken to prison over IRS discrepancies. Both died within months of going to prison from cancer. Those were political prisoners AND, why was their home so completely looted ? ? ?

Mike, Norwalk

Robert, cherry picking an event and trying to thread a small yarn of accuracy to support a bigger lie only demonstrates an ignorant bigotry (see my comment below). I personally don't agree with many of the conclusions drawn from the non-believing politically appointed bishops (in any of the called meetings) BUT, even that doesn't rise to the level of your attempted hoorah.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.