[1-25] of 8862

Posts from Mike, Norwalk

Mike, NorwalkMike, Norwalk
Mike, Norwalk

“Law” has a broad nomenclature that divides into multiple political philosophies (including applications), many temporal images, diverse understandings, scores of mental aberrations, and an exponentially expanding difference of systems / exercises  / administrations. “Law, in its most general and comprehensive sense, law signifies a rule of action; and this term is applied indiscriminately to all kinds of action; whether animate or inanimate, rational or irrational.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Law's attributed source, helps define subsequent philosophical applications as well as the applied system of law and justice. – By example:

1.) “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence {a limiting static recognition of law specific to nature, subject nomenclature animating an umbrella of that which is eternal and absolute in a constitution / disposition of things as they are} natural law – the intended jurisprudence of the de jure States united). Infinite and unwavering rules of nature are categorically understood through assessable proficiencies such as gravity, physics, math, ultimate science, life, liberty and property (an Iroquois Federation measure, the constitutional law of the land). The source is nature, beyond man’s capacity or potential to create or alter - natural order / law (that which veraciously and uniquely defines inalienable right and liberty).

2.) Legal Positivism; Legal Positivism is arbitrary, “An arbitrary law is one made by the legislator simply because he wills it, and is not founded in the nature of things;” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) – Legal Positivism is most often “used in opposition to natural law” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary). The source is corporeal or carnal man’s intent and resolution to control.

3.) Legal Realism; Legal Realism is arbitrary and habitually time/situation fleeting, instituted by any source, at any time regardless of natural law or legal positivism (executive, judicial, personal, etc.). The source is corporeal or carnal man’s intent and resolution to control. Judicial activism (including judicial precedence) is a form of Legal Realism and a demonic tyranny.

4.) etc.


The currant occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's exclusive use of "Legal Positivism", "Legal Realism" (inclusive of the here addressed judicial precedence) and flagrant anti-law criminality is clearly unconstitutional and an application of despots' demonic tyranny. The CCP's criminal puppet now heading the demise of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, peace and prosperity at/by natural / constitutional law is using the spot on subject matter of this quote as just one of his demonic tools.

Mike, Norwalk

Joe, that was his point  in fact, his point was going to court is, under the name of precedents, going to be an unjust experience.

Mike, Norwalk

I don't know about the greatest but an extremely acute in the obvious altruism. 

Mike, Norwalk

Walter, thanks for the compliment but it is one brilliant editor that displays being one step above all of us for the creation of this blog. I'm just a bystander here.

Mike, Norwalk

L. Hanson, your new definition of religion propagated by the socialistic theocracy infesting this land is a misdirection falsehood. Freedom began from a gestation of nature's truth, love and faith at natural law as is averse to a tyrannous enslavement. When the individual sovereign (joint heirs with Christ  being the King of a noble progeny) was recognized as an entity with inalienable rights and liberty at "the laws of nature and of nature's God) freedom was born. The religion uniquely and accurately expressing Jesus the Christ's full teachings is simply a segment of natural law. The occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land (Canada, U.S.A., etc.) is absolutely antithetical the here above stated religion, rights, liberty and the application / administration of a separation of church and State (at natural law).

Mike, Norwalk

A pseudo psycho attempt at psychology.  There are drama queens, control freaks, etc. that require problems as a learned trait in a land of mental abnormalities. Such does not make up a general rule. I have to admit though, I really liked Jonathan Livingston Seagull.

Mike, Norwalk

Bert, knowledge of our Father's spirit is unique to he who has faith  the truth thereof heals. Religion outside truth, love, knowledge, etc., such as a pretend ethical / moral belief in socialism, is in fact, a disease, especially when ignorance of the spirit attempts to set forth pretend knowledge.

Mike, Norwalk

The secondary premise of the addressed concept is faulty at best. Crimes were/are committed to punish violators of those yielding the biggest swords, chains and whips; WHILE, ignorance, filth and poverty are NOT the missionaries of crime, carnal power, demented ethics and morals, and disregard for rights, liberty and natural law are a more accurate depiction. The conclusion of this sound bite is accurate to a fault; "As long as dishonorable success outranks honest effort -- as long as society bows and cringes before the great thieves, there will be little ones enough to fill the jails.”

Mike, Norwalk

Let's hope your  beyond the immediate sound bite, is in fact a greater understanding of the complete message. Your explanation is more accurate than the cherry picked statement.

Mike, Norwalk

I don't know how to rate this sound bite as, any accuracy here alluded to is long sense become extinct. It brings me great joy to know that I am a sovereign son of Eternity's King, knowing that this land was endowed with individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at natural law. As Archer so aptly describes one of the reasons "habeas corpus" no longer is recognized by the occupying statist theocracy that now infests this land, almost nothing of rights, liberty, law or justice exists within the demonic body politic that now enslaves the masses. No longer can a freeman walk uprightly without fear of being incarcerated (or worse) if that party stands for anything but the wake theocracy's most current dogmas.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, one difference between a "democracy" and a 'representative republic" is what is agreed to or disagreed with / voted on. A "democracy" is absolutely antithetical to rule by/of law (specifically = "the laws of nature and of nature's God" {Declaration of independence}); AND IS, tyranny by the greatest / most numerous force.

A "democracy" focus is on a whole that is inconsequentially made-up of insignificant segments with each part being different (different needs, wants, ability, etc.). A "democracy" tyrannically creates theocratic dogmas while enforcing such through an enslaving legal positivism.

A "representative republic" recognizes natural law that already exists and represents the inalienable rights, liberty and individual sovereignty of each and every of the noble family man (all such rights, liberty, etc is exactly the same in all people). A "representative republic" agrees / disagrees / votes on how to manage existing rights, liberty, sovereignty and law.

“Law” has a broad nomenclature that divides into multiple political philosophies (including applications), many temporal images, diverse understandings, scores of mental aberrations, and an exponentially expanding difference of systems / exercises  / administrations. “Law, in its most general and comprehensive sense, law signifies a rule of action; and this term is applied indiscriminately to all kinds of action; whether animate or inanimate, rational or irrational.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Law's attributed source, helps define subsequent philosophical applications as well as the applied system of law and justice. – By example:

1.) “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence {a limiting static recognition of natural law, subject nomenclature animating an umbrella of that which is eternal and absolute in nature} natural law – the intended jurisprudence of the de jure States united). Infinite and unwavering rules of nature are categorically understood through assessable proficiencies such as gravity, physics, math, ultimate science, life, liberty and property (an Iroquois Federation measure, the constitutional law of the land). The source is nature, beyond man’s capacity or potential to create - natural order / law (that which veraciously defines inalienable right and liberty).

2.) Legal Positivism; Legal Positivism is arbitrary, “An arbitrary law is one made by the legislator simply because he wills it, and is not founded in the nature of things;” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) – Legal Positivism is most often “used in opposition to natural law” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary). The source is corporeal or carnal man’s intent and resolution to control.

3.) Legal Realism; Legal Realism is arbitrary and habitually time/situation fleeting, instituted by any source, at any time regardless of natural law or legal positivism (executive, judicial, personal, etc.). The source is corporeal or carnal man’s intent and resolution to control.

4.) etc.


Mike, Norwalk

I'm not sure how to rate this. As a general rule, I would have to say the statement is very accurate more often than not. A good example would be the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land. The high priests / priestesses thereof advance a demonic enslavement of their perceived chattel, proving up a malefactor ethics by creating and enforcing compelled compliance, government licensing, victimless crimes, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, police State confiscations, etc.) and prosecution of anyone that would express inalienable rights, liberty or personal sovereignty. Said theocratic patrons have in fact chosen to be lower than the dirt the individual noble sovereign(s) walk upon.

Mike, Norwalk

Liberty is: “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Liberty is the “exemption from extraneous control.  The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons.  Liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st ed.). Clarifying original fact, natural law intent, and de jure jurisprudence: “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” (Thomas Jefferson) “The Natural Liberty of Man is to be free from any Superior Power on Earth, and not to be under the Will or Legislative Authority of Man, but to have only the Law of Nature for his Rule.” (John Locke - second most quoted source for creation of the Constitution) “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property ⋯ and is regarded as inalienable.” (16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987). Liberty, under “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence) – natural law, is the state of exercising all inalienable rights. “All men are created equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; among which are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing the obtaining of happiness and safety.” (George Mason)

The term or concept: "money", appears no where in the definition of liberty.

Mike, Norwalk

Socialism is any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership of all property, direction of religion and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods. Communism is an administration of socialism that holds all within its singular State name. As coined by Mussolini, fascism is socialism through State control by corporations. Corporations are extensions of the State with a bifurcation - i.e. The State maintains ultimate equitable ownership of all property while controlling creation and perimeters of operation. Under a false illusion of private action, enslaved operators act within a capacity at legal positivism of officer, stock holder, etc. Hitler, gaining power through the “National Socialist Workers Party” evolved from communistic tendencies to the more sufficient fascism.

Mike, Norwalk

Einstein was obviously here a neophyte in attempting to scientifically evaluate the laws associated with socialism as a purely economic system. In the article you provided, Einstein drew most heavily from religion’s dogmas rather than from the general laws in the field of economics. Some of his observations were very accurate (such as religion’s brutes took over the people’s education - by example; the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land enlarges its dogmas {while decreasing studies in math, science, natural law, etc.} through ecclesiastical seminaries (government schools). Also, in Einstein’s calculations and thought projections, he did not incorporate an economic system’s conversion to religion through an erroneous claim of ethics and morals. I thoroughly enjoyed the article, thank you.

Mike, Norwalk

I'm not sure how to rate this. It was Marx that made vogue the term "capitalism" with an extreme change in meaning. Pure and traditional capitalism included a tangible monetary exchange such as gold and silver coin. Theocratic communism's adversary was fallaciously claimed to be a debt based capitalism. In 1913 both the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto and debt notes came into play advancing Lenin's here prediction.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, by your figures, the IRS operation's cost was over $10B (which is of course a greatly understated lie by patrons of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land) AND, they paid nothing. We The People, being enslaved under the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto were forced to divide their expression of involuntary servitude. Where did the IRS get the near $3 trillion to pay the U.S. Treasury? (I say hmmm, Waffler's word salad is a pile of misdirection and misinformation.)

Waffler, what a sick and twisted misinformation — The IRS has / had no relation ever to your hated Jews. Guys like Carlton, Archer and myself kick against the rank enslavement, theft and mayhem of socialist demons like Hitler and the IRS.

Mike, Norwalk

Marvin Cooley was a great and fearless man that loved inalienable rights and liberty at natural law. That I could rate this innumerable times with countless stars. YES! ! !

Mike, Norwalk

Words have meaning. No language that I'm aware of, has a word that adequately describes individual sovereigns that hire servants to represent, protect and enhance inalienable rights and liberty at natural law. The traditional term government was carried over to the new experimental representative republic and began to enslave once again the noble free specie. The current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has ABSOLUTELY NO!!! sense of addressing the experiment's principles, law or justice. In the de jure States united, by ultimate definition, no lawful government exists. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land does not trust We The People AND; legitimately / lawfully I have no government to trust.

Mike, Norwalk

Absolutely, We hold this truth to be self evident.

Mike, Norwalk

I like it a lot. I agree

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler  please enlighten us as to your definition of liberty. I would define Liberty as: “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Liberty is the “exemption from extraneous control.  The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons.  Liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st ed.). Clarifying original fact, natural law intent, and de jure jurisprudence: “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” (Thomas Jefferson) “The Natural Liberty of Man is to be free from any Superior Power on Earth, and not to be under the Will or Legislative Authority of Man, but to have only the Law of Nature for his Rule.” (John Locke - second most quoted source for creation of the Constitution) “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property ⋯ and is regarded as inalienable.” (16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987). Liberty, under “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence) – natural law, is the state of exercising all inalienable rights. “All men are created equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; among which are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing the obtaining of happiness and safety.” (George Mason)

A body of servants that serve to protect and enhance individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence  natural law as stated in and used by my definition above);  That being contrary to a body politic (government) that creates and enforces compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes and larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, Social Security, police state confiscations, tribute for property, etc.).

Waffler, with the facts in print before you, please mention one government that is not opposite liberty.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land is ANTI: individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and de jure constitutional law. Which of your referenced theocratic corporations or derivatives thereof are now acting as watch dogs, prosecuting the corruption of the unconstitutional compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes or illicit larceny (2nd plank of the ccomunist manifesto, Social Security, police state confiscations, etc.)?

Mike, Norwalk

The CCP's criminal puppet that would be king/god of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has addressed Patric Henry's quandary. He "noticed" We The People that full implementation of our rights (as identified in the 2nd Amendment) is at odds with the might of his military so we should surrender now and give up our implements of defense / war.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.