Someday an educated individual with gain control of our practices and repair them.

So why is everyone so ignorant and superstitious?

Mike Norwalk: A rose is a rose by any other name. Conversely, you can call yourself anything want, meaning many misguided have used the label, Socialist My role here on this planet is to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, house the homeless, develop the human organism. These are the social responsibilities of all humans. Socialism is associated to social responsibilities.

Mike Norwalk: Socialist do not censer any reasonable, rational utterance. If it makes sense the Socialist will never halt it's conveyance. Mike, your the one that doesn't make sense. The conventional forces just adore the silly, stupid written deliveries you espouse. When a system is 30 trillion dollars in debt like this one, you want to know you can blame it all on the uneducated as yourself.

Mike Norwalk: Words are a interesting device 

in that they can be used by an uneducated person as yourself to deliver your negative and bias nonsense.  Socialist, if you notice, can convey positive messages because their not ruled by addiction and cowardice.  Socialist are unbiased. The Socialist is ruled by the rules and principles of morality. As I compose this message I'm witnessing a parade of abortion supporters condoning murder. You know Mike these abortion supporters have more respect and regard for the innocent fetus they easily depose  of, then any of the rest of us, after all no fetus has ever delivered any oppositional conveyances to these murderers. The Social being respects all life. The fetus is the growing emergence of life. The Socialist is self aware and has a broader perspective.

Where are individuals of civil manners? Where are the diplomats? Where are the truly educated? Where are cooperative processers of life. Where are the recovered humans?  Where are the law abiding for humanity?

The creation of abilities that promote an atmosphere of humanity is one that can educate beings on proper conduct for living a civilized, mannerly approach that will enable them to practice a social condition with no need for firearms.  You will notice that firearm possessers have no abilities to converse. Their just basically silent hoodlum bullies with no constructive abilities. You will notice the opposition forces to firearms are very eloquent.

A true historian, processed of proper facts, figures and intuitive details can provide the balance capable of preserving a constitution against oppositional forces.

With the realization that the collective interest and individual interest are one and the same their will be the realization for no firearms.

Logically that would also mean that those least endangering rights are under the most suspicion.  That means that conventional societal structure spend all their time spying on those most supportive to national security.

Firearms and discipline are diametrically opposed.

Mr Archer: Its honesty and integrity that meets the most resistance in an psychotic atmosphere that is the conventional societal arrangement and yes I face it daily.

Mr Archer: We must earn our way to freedom through justification of the freedom.

Mr Archer: Doing the correct responsible action is the true freedom we humans have been seeking since the beginning of our emergence.

It would be much more convenient and prosperous to have educated individuals in the role of the world's elected officials then what we are typically left with after the votes are counted.

Mr Archer: For the children to be guided to the responsible position by the adult is a unwavering performance of fortitude, courage, devotion, and love.

Mr Archer: the biggest change has to be the child into adult. The conventional individual is without a doubt a child ("we are the world, we are the children").  CHILD INTO ADULT is the change we need.  The Socialist says no more playing, the time for constructive labor has arrived.

Mr Archer: The conflict of our existence is the spoiled brat anti-social(psychotic) child in opposition to the social responsible (Socialist) adult. I try very strenuously to be in full support of former being developed into the latter,

Mr Archer: I would say I'm that I'm not anti-christian any more then  I am anti-VCR. Christianity had it's developmental proceedings, but now we must grow up and move past it's uselessness. It is now just mostly criminal and has always probably harbored those elements.

Mr Archer: A man of reason concludes that if it related to life it simply grows.  The rights of today will have no bearing on tomorrow because men naturally grow. In the future men will look back at the record and be appalled that individuals actually considered shooting others, hence the second amendment. The most productive course  is to open up avenues of change and growth. The firearms supporter is not being challenged on the right to bear arms and therefore it not a productive course because it not being questioned as is the characteristic of infectious social diseases.  The constitution is related to life therefore it will grow and overturn the second amendment.  The most productive course is to believe "the wisdom of the people" will always steer the course of this nation the correct direction and abandon the second amendment as contrary to the beliefs and motives of success of this great nation.

The individual states will also follow in accordance

Mr Archer: We are governored by what is correct. You don't really have a view, and I don't have a view. There is one correct procedure for  all actions and the art of reason will lead us to that procedure.  We as reasonable men must weigh components of every variable and arrive at the  resolving formulas.  Social abilities refer to the connection of our species. We understand existence correctly if we realize when we look into ourselves we are observing everyone, and when look at others we are observing ourselves.  So we feel a connection with the most heinous acting of our follows as the most wholesome. We try desperately to understand those who go on murderous rampages and try to understand that could be any one of us and not put ourselves in a high righteous judgemental position to avoid more of this practice. At the same we want to follow those who have been credited with great acts of heroism and find we are capable of the same distinction.  Social abilities grow and grow as we learn and learn and our follows are a great reservoir for learning.

Mr Archer: This idea of constitution is a problem if it inhibits inquiry.  As a human being we need relevant and free flowing information as urgently as free flowing blood in our arteries, and if a constitutional clause blocks arterial information paths we must be prepared to ignore it's stipulations. I'm sorry I'm complicating a little here. The point is that I feel the obligation I have is to bring forth the belief to the idea to people of Maine is that there is no need for firearms therefore no need to question the right, and therefore nullification of the constitutional exercise. We must change hearts and minds to produce the most productive course, therefore I believe the constitutional device is  plagued with primitiveness and must be constructively updated.

Sorry Mr Archer your psychotic arrangement produces nothing but misleading film versions of life, touchdowns, slam dunks, home runs, crooked politicians in essence a straight course to the grave, and I'm the only one that has an alternative. No narcissism, no psychosis, just the honest truth.

E. Archer,  NYC  Its not surprising that you of the psychotic conventional mindset would not understand what a social ability would entail. Diplomacy, sincere negotiations, purposeful goals and intent, cooperative life processing, productiveness are completely unknown to the conventional individual. I will not argue the point that I am the only individual versed in what I express, that is explained in fact that I alone possess the maturity for any substantial meaningful human expression, sad to say.

Doesn't the amendable characteristic of a constitution imply that there will always be a developmental process to any right, and therefore with consideration of the changes inherent of any right or privilege, it will eventually meet it's questioned opposition?