An obvious caveat is govern's definition and implementation.

Sillik, your deep down, core hate and anger derive from your extremely antagonistic definitions and perceptions of freedom, liberty, rights and nature's law. Your theocratic socialism's dogmas fallaciously proclaim and declare circular word salad to be something other than what in fact, it/they is/are. You rely on mental deceptions (mental disorder / illness, empty, without merit or substance - without fact or proof) of a low IQ / very immature child (the pot calling the kettle black). The norm of your theocratic socialism’s dogma exists by calling evil good, and good evil; putting darkness for light, and light for darkness; and, putting bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.

By example: you state: “Adults accept explanations and provide them with every circumstance.” As an adult, my explanation gave an accurate definition at law and historical society’s use of freedom, liberty and right. As a mentally immature brat, you could not accept a grown-up world’s explanation, meaning, understanding or concept (AND/OR, provide a rational circumstance). You continue to have to redefine words and concepts to support your most recent lie (VERY immature). Your hallucinatory law of growth (??? NOT definable in the real world) talked to you and told you a fiction of rights and that anything outside your delusion was regressive. You really might want to check your medications or, at lest those little voices in your head.

Sillik, one reason you are a socialist is that you hate freedom, liberty and inalienable rights at law so vehemently, you can only follow admonitions of your god(s) — by example: "a lie told often enough becomes the truth" (Lenin). You continue to make up circular word salad to redefine words, terms and concepts.

FREEDOM is: “The state of being free; liberty; self determination:” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st Edition); freedom is: “the power or liberty to order one's own actions” (Colins English Dictionary); freedom is: “The ability to act at liberty.” (Webster’s Dictionary) “All men by nature are equal in that equal right that every man hath to his natural freedom, without being subjected to the will or authority of any other man; being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.” (John Locke) “Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere.” (Franklin D. Roosevelt) “Freedom is independence of the compulsory will of another, and in so far as it tends to exist with the freedom of all according to a universal law, it is the one sole original inborn right belonging to every man in virtue of his humanity.” (Immanuel Kant) Freedom is an endowed expression from an inherent creation; NOT ! an abstract ethos based / outside-in to-be-controlled anomaly.

LIBERTY is; “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Liberty is the “exemption from extraneous control. The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons. Liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st ed.). Clarifying original fact, nature’s law intent, and de jure jurisprudence: liberty is; “The condition of being free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor.” (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition.) “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” (Thomas Jefferson) “The Natural Liberty of Man is to be free from any Superior Power on Earth, and not to be under the Will or Legislative Authority of Man, but to have only the Law of Nature for his Rule.” (John Locke - second most quoted source for creation of the Constitution) “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property ⋯ and is regarded as inalienable.” (16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987). Liberty, under “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence) – nature’s law, is the state of exercising all inalienable rights. “All men are created equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; among which are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing the obtaining of happiness and safety.” (George Mason) “So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.” (James 2:12) For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.” (Galatians 5:16) “Where liberty is, there is my country” (Benjamin Franklin).

A “right”; is an eternally actionable warrant that, intrinsically facilitates a most base particle’s just mechanics and/or performance. Right(s) is an inherent, inviolate, just and omnipresent component / factor / attribute, composing matter’s structure of expression - bonding / sealing the “be” to the “be” and to the “do” (law existing as the ultimate and final definition: “do”). Right(s) is/are an intricate constituent in/at matter’s ability to self express (without right(s), matter of any size or configuration could not express itself). Expanded to organized matter (the Eternal King’s priesthood creation), a right is a single being’s just ability to commit any act that does not infringe on another’s right or justice. Though differing particles may vary or not conform, the “right(s)” intrinsic thereto remains the same.

Most simply, nature’s law (the do) expresses matter’s (the be) elocutions. Freedom and liberty are definitions at law and rights are more closely associated with justice (none can be earned - THEY JUST ARE ! ! !

I like it a lot. Poetically and in reality accurate.

“While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. ” (2 Peter 2:19) “Therefore thus saith the Lord; Ye have not hearkened unto me, in proclaiming liberty, every one to his brother, and every man to his neighbour:” (Jeremiah 34:17)

The minimum restrictions would be applied justice in the positive; NOT a lessoning of inalienable rights or liberty at nature's law.

Liberty is a measurement at / in nature's law. Law is a tangible’s applied static measurement within a domain of absolutes (biology, chemistry, physics / science, fiscal / economics, gravity, math, magnetics, life, liberty, rights, etc. Who or what is that standard maker that places an abstract worth value to law (and/or "liberty" a subcomponent thereof)? What nexus compares worth or ties liberty to a country? The only real accurate clause in this quote is that where liberty is, there IS/are also acknowledged rights (that exist inalienably).

I like it a lot — extremely more accurate than not !

Archer, my wife was also a super lady and stay at home mom (has since past). She did not even work when we were so poor we didn't have as much as a car to sleep in. We did not take as much as a morsel from any government related anything. Through my labors outside the home, the situation improved. My wife also homeschooled our kids. The stark differences between nature's law's historical examples (personal sovereignty, inalienable rights, and liberty vs. all else) is more than illustratively abundant. Socialism is a religion that is antithetical to women, the family, morality, economics and all that which is the nobility of humanity.

I like it a lot. I have first hand experience of the accuracy of the quote.

That has been my experience ! ! !  and, I've roamed considerably 😁

Sillik, your extremely empty word salad once again demonstrates your promulgation and support for an absolute enslaving ignorance. If your word salad uniquely addressed the definition, theology (religion) and practice of socialism, you would be absolutely right. From your personal “god” complex position, continuing to redefine words and concepts doesn’t fair well for your attempts at furthering your religious propaganda. By example: religion is; “real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to ⋯ our fellow men.” (Bouviers Law Dictionary). “⋯ Socialism is a religion.” (Joseph Goebbels, Diary entry, October 16, 1928)

Another religion’s author stated: “But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven.” Your here stated single doctrine is in toto, antithetical to Christianity and harmonious with your stated attributes of socialist gods (like yourself) and the religion thereof that promulgates and supports nothing but cold hearted violent cruelness.

I like it a lot — far more accurate than not!

Said exceptionally well; — except — for man creating liberty or freedom. Liberty and freedom are not created by man, as they are eternal definitions at nature's law. Compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, etc.), non-recognition of individual sovereignty, perfected allodium, inalienable rights and LIBERTY at nature's law are each enslaving elements antithetical to liberty ! ! !

Sillik, for myself, I am free and truly happy. There, you've met at least two? 😁

I believe an aspiration toward freedom is "a" most noble human manifestation BUT, I don't believe it is the most essential. Elements, such as love and faith are a base of humanity that secondarily affords the seeking of freedom. An example on the other side concerns people like socialists; — they identify and change love for certain emotions, faith for enslaving theocratic beliefs while calling evil good, and good evil; they put darkness for light, and light for darkness; and they put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

     Mick, family today is defined by dysfunctional malefactors, cherry picking events in an attempt to change the wholistic / historical meaning of family. The current norm is to place woke / anti-family parties in a descriptive view, from a 30,000 ft. high vantage (identifying a structured family) which only distracts from the core. Homosexuality in large part is a taught mental disorder within a familial setting. By "God Ordained”; what carnal created god or false facade is doing the ordaining?

     The here subject matter family focused on is a man and a woman covenanting (beyond merely contracting) to unite in a very narrow relationship at nature's law. That family unit that is blessed with children then instills the values of nature's laws (Nature’s law is the absolute explicate / expositor of quantum matter’s most base composition (definition of the be’s do). Nature’s law is an inherent conduct, primitive effect and definable action. “The law of nature is that which God, the sovereign of the universe, has prescribed to all men, ⋯” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary). Law is a tangible’s applied static measurement within a domain of absolutes (biology, chemistry, physics / science, fiscal / economics, gravity, math, magnetics, life, liberty, and rights that then emit morals, ethics, work habits, personal responsibility, honesty, integrity, etc.).

     Marx and Lenin both understood well the family’s importance and effected such demonic philosophies as socialism (communism, fascism, etc.) to destroy such.

Another direct family member that describes my life's observations.

been there, done that — got the T shirt; I like it a lot.

In the limited scope perceived, I like it a lot.

We hold this truth to be self evident.

😁 I'm sure I meant illuminated obvious. 

Archer, Very well said, very accurate !

In the scope that it was given, I agree. I also believe in most cases, forgetting is a large part of forgiving. History and science here answers the non-forgetting portion of the quote. By example; forgiving socialists for their atrocities enhances the individual's humanity - BUT NEVER, forget the horrors of applied socialism.

Sillik, FYI one element of schizophrenia is when individuals think they are people 🤪🤣