ABSOLUTELY ! We hold this truth to be self evident ! ! !

🤣 Sillik, hahaha / lolololol ! ! !, You proved my above point absolute by extreme degree. Your empty world salad is theocratic dribble — NOT science.

🤪 Sillik, lolol, hahaha! ! ! First, you have no clue what science is. You've been ask to give a science based (through a science methodology) how or why socialism works. YOU CAN'T. Science has NEVER ruled of the possibility of any god. OR, on the other hand, please illuminate your stated science. Scientifically, please let us know how creation occurred without an intelligent design, or how / why matter relates to matter (how/why) a neutron or electron consistently associates with each other, etc., etc., etc. Under a definition of "god", your claiming to be the sole socialist with humanity's only methodology to advancement (a god syndrome) contradicts your own statement. 

Accurate when considering a definition of liberal from 1776. Today's liberal mandates censorship, totalitarianism and considers everything outside their theocratical dogma an immoral error and not permitted. Today's liberal is offended and upset when confronted with individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law.

To know the man's heart gives rise to the greatness where his sense of duty out weighed the simpler calls of life.

A huge string of accuracy weaves its way through the tapestry's meaning in the quote.

Way more accuracy than not. I remember my first college economics class where the professor explained all economics is based on the family unit. If one person per household works, the cost of items (house, car, food, etc.) will follow suit. If 2 parties per household work, the cost of items follows. What ever the parents (mother and father — nuclear family) teach (work ethic, morals, personal responsibility, independence, education, relationships, etc.) the household will follow. There is always an exception but, that is the rule.

A very accurate observation. Slaves embrace socialism and other totalitarian regimes. By example, slaves live with compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes, the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto and nonrecognition of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, and perfected allodium at nature's law.

Sillik; hahaha / lololol what would you know of substance? To date, you have been incapable of giving a palpable measurement, a tangible definition, a lawful understanding, a scientific methodology / computation or anything that would resemble anything other than a circular word salad. You claim to be the sole god of socialism. Socialism is that theocracy where there is no freedom, personal responsibility and, socialism can only exist in a false sense of security with socialist gods providing an equal distribution of welfare. Socialism's theocratically approved nomenclature replaces good with evil, puts darkness for light, replaces sweet with bitter and calls slavery freedom and freedom slavery. AND, to be “credible” within your word salad, variable qualities / specific responsibilities (as defined by a socialist) and truly free within the same sentence is an oxymoron.

Again, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU ! ! !

Life is a gift. The giver is the Eternal Father. The Christ gave the gift of eternal life.

Freedom, an inalienable expression of life, carries with it responsibility.

Eric, thank you VERY ! ! ! much for your insights and all that you do.

Attributed to George Washington, as a loose reiteration of Emperor Constantine's defense of Christianity, "The great thing about the American Christian is he would rather die on his feet than live on his knees."

I here give 1st hand spiritual, physical, mental and otherwise testimony to the extreme accuracy of the above statement. We hold this truth to be self evident. The occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land (with its socialism and otherwise anti-nature's law totalitarianism) is extremely antithetical / hostile to individual sovereignty, personal responsibility, inalienable rights, and freedom / liberty.

Sillik, if a new socialist god greater than you were to give you and each person on the planet a material resource, such as a tree, what would you personally do with it to be fair to the rest of humanity?

Sillik, if your sanity is based on your circular word salad, you are of no substance, living in a hallucination of insanity. You didn't define "fairness", "distributing", "resources", "material advantage", or who (some god greater than you) owns what of that which is to be doled out. Your word salad alludes to an elimination of individual sovereignty, personal responsibility, inalienable rights, liberty and nature's law. If you, the sole socialist god on the planet, were given a mound of rare earths in their natural state (material resource), what would you do with it differently than Elon Musk; AND, how is that fair.

Sillik, idea of fairness ? ? ?  I have no question that your's and my definitions of fairness are wildly different. Also, please define "distribution of resources" . Do things such as work ethic, desires, abilities or character (see Dr. Martin Luther King) play into your resource distribution equation? How about equality before the law or of opportunity?

Sillik, 🤪 lololol / hahaha, Your off topic / misdirection word salad does not in any way address the here subject matter. Please describe the "it" as you understand it. Is a mirror, mirror different than just a mirror? You have described yourself as being the most fair of all. If I look into a mirror, mirror, are you saying I will see you?

I like it a lot — We hold this truth to be self evident ! ! !

Sillik, your incoherent word salad does not touch on any sense of palpable reality — at law (science, math, etc.) or otherwise. Truth, peace, liberty, inalienable rights at nature's law are eternally unchanged (the same yesterday, today and forever). Ill behavior includes such enslaving decorum as socialism. Not only has socialism proven to be illogical, tyrannical, destructive and antithetical to humanity, in its many denominational expressions —  over, and over, and over again, socialism, as a theocratic mental / physical / religious abnormality defines a form of insanity.

Sillik, 🤪 hahaha, lololol, can you be more specific without using circular word salad to take the place something scientifically provable — outside your religion.

RIGHT(S): A “right”; is an eternally actionable warrant that, intrinsically facilitates a most base particle’s just mechanics and/or performance. Right(s) is an inherent, inviolate, just and omnipresent component / factor / attribute, composing matter’s structure of expression - bonding / sealing the “be” to the “be” and to the “do” (law existing as the ultimate and final definition: “do”). Right(s) is/are an intricate constituent in/at matter’s ability to self express (without right(s), matter of any size or configuration could not express itself). “You have Rights antecedent to all earthly governments: Rights, that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; Rights, derived from the Great Legislator of the universe.” (John Adams) Rights, exuding from a material source -from the inside out - are first recognized as unalienable / inalienable (“⋯ which cannot be lawfully transferred from one person to another.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)). Unseen rights, as are interacted with from the outside-in are distinguished as a principle(s). “Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity.” (Mother Teresa) In ANY scenario that entails a third party, the action is outside a domain of "right". There is NO! majority right, State's right(s), right to vote, etc.

Sillik, from your god complex status (uniquely being the sole practitioner and divine creator of socialism) what have you created?

Ummm OK. Can someone please elaborate ONE really new idea? 

🤪 I like it a lot

Sillik, (-;  (-;  I smile to an audible level ;-). ;-). you've written another self portrait — good on you.