“[N]o good government but what is republican... the very definition of a republic is 'an empire of laws, and not of men.'”

Men are to fallible. We seem to think we can change right and wrong when it doesn't fit the way we want to live.

coolio

The empire of men we have now are the international banksters...and their puppets.

Laws are good. But I learned in Belize that Law without enforcement is worthless. Selective enforcement (rich vs. poor) is worse than worthless.

What more can possibly be said?

The difference between a Republic and a Democracy is the source of law creation. If there are natural laws, as would pertain to the nobility of life, fiscal activities, etc., the defining and (as Senor Reek has pointed out) enforcement of such laws will maintain and enhance freedom and liberty.

The U.S was very fortunate to have had intelligent founders. And one of the great things they did was to make it very difficult to change the constitution, unlike some countries who allow just one person to change the constition at the drop of a hat.

We were very fortunate indeed.

Amen to that, Mr. Adams! How I wish you were here in 2009, along with you honorable colleagues, to educate the citizenry of the USA!

But men should have a say in making the laws, and they should constantly be questioning them and the authority they create.

I would here further explain; natural law (gravity, science, physics, fiscal law, murder, larceny, etc.) enforce themselves (some immediately, some over eons of time) Man's enforcement of law (law enforcement) is an oxymoron. Can one enforce gravity or fiscal law - the answer is NO! An example of a government of men's 'laws' might be understood by an examination of Keynesian economics. Socialist governments of men enforce securities rules, government intervention, central control by carnal men (government), etc. All such ends in economic destruction because it is antithetical to natural fiscal law. The fiscal law enforces itself.

Thomas Aquinas differentiates between secular law, natural law and God's law. At the time of his writing the hierarchy was God, nature, secular. In terms of the laws by which man lives or is constrained to live his life in the west is secular or man made law devised, revised and improved to promote and protect the rights of the individual within society. Pretty sure the secular laws of government are the subject matter of this quote.

Mick, I'm less than a fan of many of Aquinas' conclusions (Hobbs even less). His totalitarian spin on Aristotle was in most cases antithetical to the aspects of Locke's philosophy as were chosen by U.S. political founders. One aspect of the Greek based philosophical versions of natural law (a bit outside both aquinas and Locke) that the founders attempted to establish was the Hebrew natural law that recognized no temporal third party's authorization to govern over an individual sovereign heir to eternity.

Very well said Mike, Norwalk !! From the Greek, Physiocracy, government of Nature. The first well developed theory of economics embraced by our founding fathers. Agrarians as Jefferson, our agrarian representative who wrote the Declaration of Independence ! We are a nation designed to give glory to God and not man or his flights of fancy !

I wholeheartedly agree with Adams, but I am a bit torn as even Adams admitted:

"All good government is and must be republican. But at the same time, you can or will agree with me, that there is not in lexicography a more fraudulent word... Are we not, my friend, in danger of rendering the word republican unpopular in this country by an indiscreet, indeterminate, and equivocal use of it?"