[1-25] of 8548

Posts from Mike, Norwalk

Mike, NorwalkMike, Norwalk
Mike, Norwalk

Speaking corporeal politics, no matter the investigation into inalienable rights, individual sovereignty and liberty while obediently following Socialism (communism / fascism, liberalism / conservatism, progressive / neocon, etc.), monarchical adulation, etc. there will be no on topic / subject matter discoveries.

Mike, Norwalk

Welcome to the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land as a prime example of the quote.

Mike, Norwalk

I like it a lot. A great observation. Self-approval / peer pressure for most is a great motivator. Conforming can also be based on ignorance, physical or other fears, love, etc.

Mike, Norwalk
  • 2
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (3/27/20)

I might add a little clarity to my above statement by saying, "forced conformity does not conform with liberty."

Mike, Norwalk

A great and accurate observation.

Mike, Norwalk

The body politic was to be servants hired to protect and enhance individual inalienable right, liberty and the laws of nature and of nature's God (life, liberty, property). The occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land practices philosophies of legal positivism and legal realism which which is a tyrannical prejudice of a select enclave of carnal gods.

Mike, Norwalk

The term that defines limiting actions, restraint and an isolation of those with a contagious disease is called “quarantine”. The term that defines limiting actions, restraint and an isolation of healthy people is called “tyranny”. Any of various economic and political theories / activities advocating / enforcing collective or governmental ownership (people, property, etc.) and administration of economics, the means of production, and distribution of goods is called, “socialism” The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land does not recognize individual inalienable rights, liberty, or “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence); AND, is not a constitutionally limiting "republican form of government" (Article IV, Section 4, U.S. Constitution).

Mike, Norwalk

If journalism were limited and defined as Lehrer's here depiction, the entertainment business has completely replaced cal's above, to the point, press description.

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (3/18/20)

I don't elaborate enough concerning the 10th plank of the communist manifesto. I, with many others here have home schooled so as to foster a love of liberty, inalienable rights, and eternal law  charity and the nobility of life. I didn't need illustrate the specifics or spectrum of forced evil (local police {government license, victimless crimes, etc.}, federal malefactors {compelled compliance, larceny with impunity  2nd plank of the communist manifesto, Social Security, etc.}, secular religions, etc.), it was a blatant antithesis by any free observation.  

Mike, Norwalk

I'm not sure how to rate this  in context, at least 5 or more stars (depending on how courage is defined). The current shut down of America demonstrates a great "LACK" of courage which, proves the quote's point. I believe it to be courages to abide inalienable rights, liberty, individual sovereignty, and the laws of nature and of nature's God in the present political despotism and tyranny.

Mike, Norwalk

I wouldn't say it is worse. The threat of war is a very controlling policy. Under current circumstances, germ warfare has shown to be at least an equal to a threat thereof.

Mike, Norwalk

I’m not sure that “safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct” BUT! ! !, it is the tool most often extrapolated by national conductors to enslave the noble individual(s) and, conduct their despotism and tyranny against inalienable rights and liberty.

Mike, Norwalk

Okay, I like it  probably more often than not.

Mike, Norwalk

Almost anybody can ;-)

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (3/3/20)

Not shooting the messenger, his statement here is couched in the "legal positivism" domain of an applied philosophy (which blinds the eyes of even the elect)  as is diametrically opposed to "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) and otherwise, constitutional law.  Equality under the law recognizes each and every, any and all individual's inalienable rights and executions within liberty as absolutes. Individual people, as living beings are not equal (some have more property, physical prowesses differ, men and women have certain genetic differences, etc., etc., etc.)

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk zero, temecula (3/3/20)

Most simply, a democracy does not / can not (by definition) recognize: individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, any sentient being, "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) and The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form" (Article IV Section 4 U.S. Constitution).

A “Democracy”: “That form of government in which the sovereign power is exercised ⋯ in a body” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) – averse to an individual (mob rule). Of course, a most clear illustration being attributed to Benjamin Franklin; “Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Freedom is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.” The ole forest and tree adage works well in defining a democracy; though there are trees voting, only the forest is recognized. Lysander Spooner’s description here applies; “A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years.”

Mike, Norwalk

Property: is “the unrestricted and exclusive right to a thing; the right to dispose of the ⋯ thing in every legal way, to possess it, to use it, and exclude everyone else from interfering with it” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st, ed.)

A “Right” / “Rights”: is/are tangible matter’s inherent and inalienable preeminent entitlement - prerogative to act in/at each and every, any and all way(s) within/at justice, natural law, equity, life, liberty, property and happiness. Rights are unique to the individual (emanating from the “being”, rights are NOT, nor can they be: social, collective, or dependent on others). Rights are Divinely endowed by nature’s Creator (lawfully / legally outside corporeal man’s legislative, executive and judicial authority, prowess and power to adversely regulate, injuriously affect or otherwise deleteriously act upon). Liberty is: “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)

Liberty is the “exemption from extraneous control. The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons. Liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st ed.). Clarifying original fact, natural law intent, and de jure jurisprudence: “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” (Thomas Jefferson) “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property ⋯ and is regarded as inalienable.” (16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987).

Arms (weapons) and speech, both are elements of, and exist absolutely and substantively at / under “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence), Constitutional law, equity, common law and justice – such are at liberty, “property rights”.

Mike, Norwalk

The individual sovereign with inalienable rights and liberty intact, united with other such individual sovereigns is a great society of improved community.

Mike, Norwalk

Kind of like the frog's heating pot. I took a long time for socialism grow through the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's ecclesiastical seminaries (government schools). How long and by what indirect approaches did it take for patrons of the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto to peddler their ANTI-liberty / ANTI-inalienable right(s) / ANTI-nobility of man standard as a moniker of honor? 

Mike, Norwalk

I say hmmm, economic status doesn't determine a man's innate good or evil, though it may exacerbate such. At what price virtue?

Mike, Norwalk

More accurate than not, more often than not.

Mike, Norwalk

simple, to the point, accurate

Mike, Norwalk

Ahhh yes, the demonic oligarchs that perpetuate the glory and lies concerning the system of those that were once mere peons and chattel  now being reduced to just numbers.

Mike, Norwalk

That I could rate this quote innumerable times with unlimited stars. We hold this truth to be self evident. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land does not exist with a dogma or canon execution that would enhance or protect inalienable rights, liberty, individual sovereignty, or "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). The current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land did establish itself by not just ruining liberty BUT ! ! !, with licentiousness and arbitrary power. 

Mike, Norwalk

Racism is not unique to any pigmentation or other physical feature / characteristic. Today, there are individuals identified with red, yellow, etc. that would live a plantation existence or otherwise the life of a helot, serf or slave. Those that prefer a government "masa" call out those that wish liberty, inalienable right / personal sovereignty and an administration of "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) for themselves as racists. Such "masa" patrons often also reject content of character for the identity politics of skin color. An element of the pot calling the kettle black, as concerns racism, exists in all races of people.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.