[1-25] of 8391

Posts from Mike, Norwalk

Mike, NorwalkMike, Norwalk
Mike, Norwalk

More accurate than not. The full effort of all four branches (executive, legislative, judicial, MSM) of the current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land are practicing patrons of the quote's observation.

Mike, Norwalk

Trump Derangement Syndrome is but one example of how widespread and accurate the quote is. The forth branch (MSM) of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has taken full advantage of the quote's observation while advancing the realization thereof.

Mike, Norwalk

Not shooting the messenger  much more accurate than not. Government's rule is through force and dominance (de jure authority is an entirely different issue).“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master” (attributed to George Washington) GOVERNMENT IS NOTHING MORE THAN A MENTAL ABSTRACT OF MASS HYPNOSIS. As long as a tyrant (king, oligarchy, etc.) can continue to convince the general body of chattel as to their lowliness, wealth extraction will finance willing enforcers.

Law enforcement is an oxymoron. Can an individual enforce any facet of the "law of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) i.e, science, gravity, math, life, liberty, property? The answer: a resounding NO! ! !  Government can only enforce tyranny

Mike, Norwalk

I don't know that confidence-in-government is the single most frightening thing one can encounter but, it is way up there on any scale imaginable. According to the U.S. experience  no word or concept in any language  that I'm aware of, described / describes the original concept of individual sovereigns united, managing individual inalienable rights while enhancing liberty through hired servants. An existing body politic term "government" (antithetical to the original concept) was mostly used, due in part to, a common familiarity. The masses, used to dictatorships and tyrants, through an evolution of despotism succumb to servants becoming masters under the descriptive nomenclature of captains presiding over them (government) with only the slightest verbal reference to service.

Mike, Norwalk

The optimal word here is "honest". There will always be differences. Within the scope of Gandhi's here paradigm  ABSOLUTELY ! (the inalienable right of liberty, free thought, expression/speech, religion, etc.). In a broader observation of life, progress may only be in the eye of the beholder. Are today's communists honest  they seem to be, if nothing more than to themselves or in their own minds. Under that scenario, socialists (communists vs. fascist by example) demonstrate a great deal of honest differences but not to any healthy sign of progress. Is "honest" here related to absolute truth or just personal thought and/or theocratic desire? Current socialists must propagate lies (either outright, by ignorant fabrication or by not accepting / hearing the whole truth, etc.) to fulfill their "honest differences"  is that a sign of healthy progress?

Mike, Norwalk

I'm not quite sure how to rate this. There is an element of truth strung through the subject matter tapestry but, it doesn't cover the whole of the topic.

Mike, Norwalk

Considering the source, a great start and fabulous support network. A reference to feelings and list defining their perspective doesn't quite rise to the level on an inalienable right at nature's law.

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (6/27/19)

More on license: “A personal privilege to do some particular act or series of acts ⋯ The permission by competent authority to do an act which, without such permission would be illegal, a trespass, a tort, or otherwise not allowable.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition); or, in other words: license is a privilege to break certain laws with a pass from being prosecuted. By Constitutional law and Supreme court decision: “The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” (Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579) Further, Constitutionally (concerning privilege prohibition by/with Titles of Nobility see: Articles IV Section 4, Article IX Section 8 and Article X U.S. Constitution), A “Title of Nobility” was/is: “To confer a title of nobility, is to nominate to an order of persons to whom privileges are granted ⋯ It is not necessarily hereditary, and the objection to it arises more from the privileges supposed to be attached, than to the otherwise empty title or order.” (Horst v. Moses 48 Ala. 129, 142 (1872)

Mike, Norwalk

I'm not quite sure how to rate this  on sick individual.

Mike, Norwalk

It appears the author is here advocating victimless crime enforcement through or by multiple means. By "the law of nature and of nature's God", where no natural law has been broken (infringement of another, their rights or property) there can be NO offering to, or consideration of offered up, or induction to a de jure criminal justice system. Sin, transgression and iniquity are completely different with uniquely differing definitions (results may be the same but the source is very different). To assign the domain of sin to a crime may or may not be accurate.

Mike, Norwalk

A very accurate observation with a minor caveat. The structured inorganic body (complete with force, violence, murder, lying, etc.) is the communist patrons' god.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Don Lee, Reno (6/21/19)

Don Lee, you are swatting at gnats while swallowing the camel (a part of your feast is the use of moral relativism). Socialism is most simply any of various economic and political theories advocating or implementing collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods. By example in the U.S. the moral relativism of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has replaced total private ownership or perfected allodium with titled property and turned individual sovereigns into slave chattel by implementation of the 16th Amendment (the same as done by NAZI/fascist socialism and communist socialism). The only real difference between NAZI/fascism socialism and communist socialism is the manner of administration. Fascism extends itself through corporatism in owning and controlling everything while, communism owns and controls everything in a single name (collective, the State, etc.) Any other details added to administrative peculiarities is only a personal thought of how to best control by the administrators.

Mike, Norwalk

A very good and accurate starting list.

Mike, Norwalk

I really like the conclusion drawn on the observation. I originally felt a lil-tweek because everything was couched in a cause and effect instead of a 'that which is'. By example: the man that is love, loves liberty. The man that is substantive enough to be responsible for self (family, etc.) also loves liberty. 'BUT', in the context given, describing those that truly love liberty and those that don't, the statement is very accurate.

Mike, Norwalk

Way too accurate, way too often. By example: the most self-righteous of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land claim their despotic enforcement of compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, Social Security, police state confiscations, etc.), inalienable right / individual sovereign liberty non-recognition, and ownership of all property (no private perfected allodium) with absolute oversight of producing and distributing goods, inclusive of controlling the economy (corporations as extensions of the state, funny money/debt vs. capital, regulation, etc.), is all done in the name of chaos elimination. Further, the macabre death cults' most self-righteous perform heinous human sacrifice in the name of their gods of pleasure and life style – with at least one rationalization of chaos elimination.

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk dick, Fort Worth (6/18/19)

dick, instead of trying such scare tactics as increasing Democrat Party affiliates (KKK, etc.), what do you think about implementing a body politic of individual sovereign representatives  serving to secure and promote inalienable rights, liberty, perfected allodium and laissez faire commerce at/by the laws of nature and of nature's God and justice?  Now there's a novel concept.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk dick, Fort Worth (6/18/19)

dick, I'm of age and I don't participate in ill gotten booty or other illicit government activity.

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Dick Trice, Fort Worth (6/17/19)

Dick, "cheated by the system"??? What? Can you elaborate? That was the focus of Bastiat's statement (legal plunder / larceny, etc.). Your socialistic conclusion on "the rich who have benefitted beyond fairness" is a theocratic dogma of the lawless brainwashed, P.C. self-inflicted victims and patrons of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land (having nothing to do with reality). If there be a tax disparity within the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto it is only systemic to the legal plunder of Bastiat's here statement. What is the lawful or equitable nexus within disparity of incomes that can be explained by logic of the iniquitous system (way to general a statement base on an inaccurate foundation)? As to disparity of income, I have a close friend I grew up with that owned his own business. Though he took a DRASTIC drop in income, he decided to sell his business and go to work for the stability of a job with the Post Office (regular hours, no stress of his previous business, regular paycheck, etc. – the Post Office almost fired him for accomplishing too much – he was told to slow down). Quantity of income is not a very good measurement of fairness or equity. I've at times had more than ample for life style and other times broke beyond sight of the next meal. When I worked for a paycheck, I considered the remuneration of labor equal to the tasks performed. The income I received was not comparable to rich people (different jobs, different values). I once read a White Paper on the personality, mental capacity and abilities of those in commercial activities vs. educational instruction (pre-K through university) and income diversity, individual's labor value and social justice had no-part / nothing-to-do-with the choices that were made what so ever.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Waffler, Smith (6/17/19)

Waffler, what does a free, willing, non-forced gift have to do with the here topic of legalized plunder / larceny. Your socialistic/progressive misdirection is typical of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's tactics in moving (eliminating) an illumination on truth when it exposes your demonic darkness of enslavement. Wether a rich individual's gift is shameful or not does not address (even in the same ball park) Bastiat's here statement on larceny. I understand your desire to change the topic from your occupation as you are a paid patron of the robber barons Bastiat here speaks of. None-the-less, the topic at hand is legal plunder  inclusive of larceny.

Mike, Norwalk
  • 2
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Anonymous, Reston, VA US (6/17/19)

The "A" from Reston, your erroneous conclusions only exacerbate the tyranny and despotism of theocratic socialism. To start with, the foundational law that defines the de jure States united jurisdiction and application was to be "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) through a "republican form of government" (Article IV Section 4 U.S. Constitution). Said law is a definition of naturally occurring events (science, physics, life, liberty, property-perfected allodium). Said natural law, does not, can not, step in and enforce compassionate acts (individually or in concert as would be the understanding of a community). As to this illusionary community, will you please let me know its address so that I might subpoena it - I have questions that need answering and want to know where the fleshy part of Mr./Mz. community is that I might vaccinate it against its standards, ethics and compassionate behavior. I defined larceny below, your Mr./Mz.? community (individually or in concert) is NOT immune from the law (natural law).

Mike, Norwalk

I'm not sure how to rate this. The statement is accurate enough in its observation and conclusion  BUT !,  It is just another misdirection sophistry. For example: neither "individualized pressure groups" or, "unorganized feelings of the majority of the citizens" falls within the de jure form of: "a republican form of government" that was to represent individual sovereigns inalienable rights (inclusive of life, liberty and property). AND, to start the statement off with: "The basic problem is", is, in context, the whole of the statement is a blatant attempt to focus on and give legitimacy to the illicit, immoral and enslaving system that has replaced original intent and established order.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Tony, Maryland (6/13/19)

Tony, such an accurate observation and assessment. The Stare Decisis perpetrated on a once nation of sovereigns with inalienable rights and liberty is an ever escalating criminal event(s).

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Anonymous, Reston, VA US (6/13/19)

I love this comment and historical perspective from the "A" from Reston. Genuflecting patrons to the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land continue to parrot the same ole dogma and resolutions. Of course their high priests and priestesses are not demanded to comply with the same standards. By example: Priestess Pelosi has refused to offer up her tax returns while she demands such from her nemesis. High Priest Obama was not held to explain all his Bathhouse Barry days and the mysterious death of all those that came forth to explain the history. Impeach  indeed, l say hmmm ;-)

Mike, Norwalk

(-: WOW ! Way more truth there than fiction! :-) AND, in the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's tribunals truth is ever increasingly a hiss and a byword as PC dogma and cult theology are held sacrosanct.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.