[1-25] of 9382

Posts from Mike, Norwalk

Mike, NorwalkMike, Norwalk
Mike, Norwalk

YES ! ! !  That means those that choose individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and freedom at nature's law the  the level of supporting and protecting will be fatiguing. Every socialist, woke theologian and other malefactor that has chosen the chains of enslavement, death, pain and destruction work incessantly with lies and deception to take away such nobility of man. 

Mike, Norwalk

Absolutely, with a caveat. The ideals of building a country on the eternal nobility of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law is a life's endeavor. The occupying statist theocracy currently infesting this land is not the same country that is here referenced

Mike, Norwalk

It would really depend on those that are creating the definition and standard of what mental health is. The theocratic patrons of socialism live and promote a dogma that is within the realm of mental illness  being oppressed by honesty and integrity; and antithetical to loyalty and devotion to individual sovereignty, inalienable right, liberty, the laws of nature, justice, love and truth.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, once again you manifest one of your god's favorite sayings: "A lie told often enough becomes the truth." (Lenin) Capitalism by definition, is a laissez-faire accumulation of excess money (a tangible entity with intrinsic value like gold or silver coin) used to increase wealth. A debt system can NOT participate in a capitalist system — only Marxist "crony capitalism" can. Marx coined a new definition to base his reasoned theocratic enslavement (Marx needed a boogyman). Waffler, you who hate individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law in favor of Marxist enslavement are a very twisted and deranged individual.

Mike, Norwalk

The problems you have mentioned all deal with an unconstitutional theocracy that has no semblance to the de jure jurisprudence (''the laws of nature and of nature's God {Declaration of Independence}) A vote under Constitutional authority and principle ONLY chooses how to administer rights and liberty at nature's law — NOT — choosing a new slave master. In the socialistic based, statist theocracy now infesting this land, carnal gods are called law makers and, law enforcement officers compel tyranny. Each and every scenario you painted has extreme merit and is very accurate while, speeding up the destruction of individual sovereignty, inalienable right, liberty and the nation that was once a beacon of light on a hill to such. The current "INVASION" is just another element being played out in a socialist theocracy to destroy that once beacon of light.

Mike, Norwalk

The current problems with immigration are all due to the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land and its/their unconstitutional activities. By example;

1.) The Constitution does not authorize the federal government to address immigration (only nationalization = becoming a citizen). Immigration is left to State jurisdictions.

2.) Socialism's economic aspects are only capable of destroying a nation's economy. Over-taxing the productive elements of a group (financing ecclesiastical seminaries / public schools, creating a massive welfare class / state, adding a mindset of social security, inflating funny money, etc.) are all exacerbated when the State (foreign to We The People's individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty at the laws of nature) entices new-comers to an already over bloated unconstitutional system.

In a nature's natural assimilation, Washington was correct.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, more often than not it is the armies and police that instigate force of destruction. By way of existence, socialism indoctrinates rather than educates  all instruction and learning are not equal. Socialism is anti-the noble human's traits and being / individual sovereignty, nature's law, inalienable rights, liberty and free and independent will.

Mike, Norwalk

There have been several waves (some more intense than others) of socialism (communism, fascism, woke, etc.) directed at the States united. The founders rejected Europe's initial indoctrination in favor of an experiment to secure individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at law. In the early 1800s Germany developed a PhD status for academia. Socialism was part of the required curriculum. Then differing socialist affiliations paid for the most promising professors of ivy-league colleges, mostly focusing on the north. (about this time U.K. groups also paid for U.S. academics to study in Germany).

Such influence on academia and politicians was a prime causation of the War Between the States. There were no local policing offices in the de jure States united prior to the War Between the States except for a few experiments (New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Atlanta by example). We The People feared a local military enforcing the will of a distant few. Sheriffs were to be the head executive as agents of justice (NOT law enforcement). After the War between the States, local military (police) were established to enforce the socialist based anti-freedom laws of tyrants tyranny.

President Wilson, with his socialist minions implemented the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money / debt notes, and the ground work for the — to come Social Security. Rosevelt implemented a replacement mindset of the individual being responsible for caring for one's own existence to relying on the new god — government. I could go on and on and on etc. but, suffice it to saw - the wars that the U.S. has participated in were not for what they were advertised. The new Woke theology is just another socialist face to extinguish individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at law.

Mike, Norwalk

I’m not sure if the concept “highest glory” fits here? I’m also not quite sure, what are the principles of civil government that Adams refers to? AND, what “indissoluble bond” was made with Christian principles. In years previous, the Declaration of Independence referenced the de jure jurisprudence of the States United as “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (that would have been an harmonious mingling of Christian principles and a civil body politic). Philosophies of law (such as legal positivism, legal realism, maritime law, etc.) have replaced the Constitutional law of the land. Many Christian principles, such as innocent until proven guilty, are still fain claimed with exception (related to the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto - by example). Issues such as slavery were verbally agreed to be done away within 20 years of signing the Constitution as a compromise for immediate acceptance - such never materialized because evil malefactors further distanced themselves from Christian principles.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, I smile at your consistence of following one of you god's edicts: "A lie told often enough becomes the truth. (Lenin) And by the way, responsible adults have absolutely nothing to do with socialism. If an adult is responsible for socialism, he is the cause of slavery, pain, death, poverty, immorality, chaos, lowering of IQs and all things contrary to law! ! !

Mike, Norwalk

Anonymous, it is obvious you attended a socialistic government’s disinformation middle indoctrination center. FYI, traditional socialism is any of various religions, theories and systems in which the means of producing and distribution of goods, religion and life style is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls chattel (We The People) through social cultural means, critical theory as well as the economy.

Fascism is a form of socialism that is administered through corporations and other State entities. Communism is a form of socialism that is administered through self dominating nomenclature (owned and operated in the name of the State). The acronym “Nazi” stood for the “The National Socialist German Workers’ Party”. Germany’s totalitarianism adopted a fascist form socialism through democracy.

There are four (4) Terms that are misused, confused and otherwise incorrectly abused - by an extremely terse term explanation. Any of various religions, theories or systems in which the means of producing and distribution of goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls chattel (We The People) through social cultural means, critical theory as well as the economy


Democracy is: “That form of government in which the sovereign power is exercised by the people in a body,” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Democracy can not perceive or identify a single person or individual (inclusive of the rights, liberty or law thereof) - its domain or realm is solely limited to recognizing an inorganic whole’s ostensively supposed will. By democracy’s definition and practice, there is no individual sovereignty, personal rights, liberty, nature’s law or anything outside a mobs will. Attributed to Benjamin Franklin is a quote that describes democracy well: “Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Freedom is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.”


Democratic process describes a procedurally measured system that maintains “A series of actions, motions, or occurrences; a method, mode, or operation, whereby a result or effect to produced.” (West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, ed. 2.) A “democratic process” may be useful in a democracy, a republic or a republican form government (it is NOT exclusive to democracy). A “democratic process” also simply indicates, one (1) man, one (1) vote (no reference to outcome, form of government {democracy, monarchy, republican, de facto, de jure, etc.}) or, choice between liberty or slavery.


A Republic is primarily separated into ostensibly differing references. By example:
1) A “republic” is “A commonwealth; that form of government in which the administration of affairs is open to all the citizens.”
2) “In another sense, it signifies the state, independently of its form of government.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)
A democracy perceives a/the “body” - people or otherwise are an inconsequential annoyance only required for voting; while, a republic administers the affairs of each citizen.
3) A republic can also be the term that describes the specific boarder (boundaries) of a particular jurisdiction, not denoting any system of body politic application.


A republican form of government (see Article IV Section 4 U.S. Constitution) is an egalitarian based system where individual sentient sovereigns exercise personal inalienable rights and liberty at “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence). A resulting consortium, as a body politic (hired, elected or otherwise) has no rights but duties only AND, does (do) NOT represent any individual (personally or in concert) but rather, is to administer a limited “legislative”, “executive” and “judicial” charge of inalienable rights and liberty at the "laws of nature and of nature’s God".

Mike, Norwalk

Bonnie, are you aware of America's implementation of the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto (as well as the rest of the 10 planks), Social Security, police enforcement of compelled compliance, government licensing, the central government paying farmers not to grow food, and otherwise central government's control over the means of production and distribution?

Mike, Norwalk

Thanks for the input

Mike, Norwalk

The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land (Canada, U.S., the world, etc.) is now far worse than a lamb / wolf comparison. Enslavement enforcement by the executive, canon creation by the Moloch patrons / Marxists / immoral Woke demons and the NON— recognizable judicial renderings are beyond corrupt (no relation to law). Scripturally, it is prophesied that carnal man and his governments will become drunk with the wine of the mother of all whores' intoxicating dogmas, tenets, reasoning and fornication.

Mike, Norwalk

I like it a lot. You personally can not compel your next door neighbor to wear a seat belt thus, because you do not possess that ability, you can not delegate that ability to the party that represents your rights and liberty. Because you or I do not possess (individually or in concert) the ability to make driving illegal for your next door neighbor (or anyone), you / me / we can not delegate that ability to your / my / our representative(s). Because your whole neighborhood (individually or in concert) does not possess the ability to authorize larceny (like the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto) none of the block can delegate that ability to his/her/their representative(s).

Mike, Norwalk

The translation version being accurate enough — ABSOLUTELY! ! !  That I could rate this with enumerable stars an unlimited number of times. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, as has been currently enabled - is constitutionally recognized as the "establishment of religion". Patrons of Moloch running rampant, fill full the the forces of evil. Religious sacraments such as marriage now present darkness. With dark spiritual forces, the statist theocracy's prophets and priests "deceive the very elect" into accepting demonic dogmas presented as law (compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses, larceny with impunity {2nd plank of the communist manifesto, non-acceptance of perfected allodium, use of funny money, etc.}) and NON-permitting of individual sovereignty (each individual being an heir to the King of Eternity), inalienable rights, liberty and the laws of nature. The cosmic powers of this present darkness war against Christianity.

Mike, Norwalk

The “A” from Reston, how stereo typical your empty theocratic socialist diatribe. Anyone’s opinion that is different from and/or contrary to individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and nature’s law IS non-American ! AND, more than an opinion being non-American, theocratic socialism’s applied enforcement of slavery (compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses and larceny with impunity {2nd plank of the communist manifesto, NON-recognition of perfected allodium, funny money, etc.}) is also NON-American.

From your small mind - please enlighten us with your redefinition of “small minds”.

Are all business owners fat slobs? Please enlighten us with the latest theocratic Socialism’s redefinition of fat slob business owner. Also, please enlighten us with the latest theocratic Socialism’s redefinition of “slave”. Please include if the fat slob business owner’ is or is not industrious and his enslavement includes a willing acceptance of some medium of exchange for the slave’s labors and if the slave is free to leave his/her enslavement any time he/she pleases.

Unlike some, your forced religion’s enslaving “care” for other people who are less fortunate than yourself (glad to see you are the fulcrum between less and more fortunate, rich and poor, etc.) can be justified by forced patronage into the established religion

I personally think we have more machinery of government (i.e. religion) than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious.

Mike, Norwalk

Robert, by original definition, capitalism and debt are absolutely antithetical  one to the other. Marx's, and other socialist's "RE"definitions in support of an ever elusive bogy-man create, - are at best, a Keynesian economics (socialism's adversary) lying explanation / rationalization to enslave the masses.

Mike, Norwalk

Your incongruous dichotomy is a double speak word salad with multiple contradicting differences. By example; In the de jure States united “the laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence) were to be the sole jurisdiction within a “republican form of government” (Article IV, Section 4, U.S. Constitution) - (non of such now exists). Such foundation did NOT address a representation of corporeal chattel but rather, inalienable rights in liberty at nature’s law. Individuals, with their many differences can NOT be represented harmoniously to a whole of united personages. Rights and liberty at nature’s law can be represented as each individual sovereign intrinsically / inherently has the exact same rights and liberty at law.

Justice is blind with all individuals being equal before the law - no majority or minority is contemplated. The “equality as Englishmen” desired was to rights, liberty and nature’s law and NOT a socialist / communal enslavement. “A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years.” (Lysander Spooner)

More accurately and to the point - The U.S.’s “robber barons and corrupt politicians have more effectively implemented the rights / liberty / nature’s law destroying 2nd plank of the communist manifesto than any other nation. The demonic priests / priestesses of the occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land have stolen everything We The People rightfully / at liberty / lawfully possess(ed) through a guise of tax on trade, our property, our produce, our all.

Mike, Norwalk

"We used to be a free people. Now we are hedged by": carnal gods calling themselves "law makers" / "law enforcers", carnal gods executing absolutely corrupt / lawless courts and carnal gods flagrantly enforcing despotism / tyranny / despotic destruction. Exponentially, inalienable rights and liberty are in the extreme, waning. 

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.