[1-25] of 8428

Posts from Mike, Norwalk

Mike, NorwalkMike, Norwalk
Mike, Norwalk

(-: I smile ;-) fun comments  I like it, a lot.  Ahhh, that individual sovereigns united could replace the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land with a loving and just administration of life, liberty, inalienable rights and property.

Mike, Norwalk

Said well and mostly accurate. I would like to get his spin on fascism. Today's liberals are theocratic bullies that want to implement their own version of socialism (communism, fascism, progressivism, etc.). It seams liberals have tried to erroneously redefine fascism to mean anything that disagrees with them.

Mike, Norwalk

In context, accurate enough. The quote does lend a semblance of substance to Patrick Henry's: "Give me liberty or give me death." It is a very sad situation when patrons of the current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land would rather have political correctness, freebees, an unrealistic / unsustainable economy, compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, Social Security, police state confiscations, etc.), non-recogniton of individual sovereign status and inalienable rights, etc., etc., etc. rather than liberty.

Mike, Norwalk

I guess that is one cause / effect perspective. Another society would equate anger with a heavy sigh breathed through the nose  a status of existence without love and truth exhibited when a carnal expectation is not met.

Mike, Norwalk

The quality or state of being faithful to an abstract collective requires a rigid belief and enforcement of carnal god canons  — a perceived dominion that exceeds the concept of individual sovereigns (joint heirs with Christ) inalienable rights and liberty inclusive of servants to a representative republic.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Robert Edwards, somewhere in the USA (8/30/19)

Robert, more intelligence? Humanism, with it’s atheistic mores and socialistic administrations created more wars, death, mutilations, carnage, destruction, pain, etc., etc., etc. just in the pervious century alone to exceed all other historical atrocities of religion.

Humanism is a religion based on erroneous human reason, ethics, morals, pseudoscience and religious dogma. Your reference to morality, ethics and self fulfillment as non-religious is an oxymoron. Your new progressive/liberal definition of religion only works in enclaves of god haters.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Robert Edwards, somewhere in the USA (8/30/19)

Robert, we've had this discussion before. Your ignorance, hatred and knee jerk reaction for all things "god" always direct your prejudice and false illustrations of religion.

AGAIN; Religion is: a sacrosanct object of conscience (an ethic(s), a moral(s), a value (system) or an orientation of correctness / enlightenment) believed sufficiently conventional as to enable an attributable action(s). Religion’s initiating elements of conscience, through fruition of action, encompasses self-obligated pursuits, imperative practices and devoted interests (by way of extreme brevity / example: safety, health, fairness, monetary equality vs. equality before the law, and well being). A ‘god’, ‘causation’, or other ‘relegated source’ of such enabling elements may or may not be instrumental (or even useful) in defining religion. (by way of example: Buddhism, Taoism, ethical culture and Humanism).Religion is: “ real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to ⋯ our fellow men.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) This definition’s focus is on “real piety in practice” - and - “the performance of all known duties” - again, a sacrosanct object of conscience believed sufficiently conventional as to enable attributable actions (socialism or democratic socialism are destructive economic systems in and of them selves – not religion; BUT & WHILE ! ! !, when socialism is forcibly implemented by reason of ethics, morals, orientation of correctness, real piety in practice or, felt/believed sufficiently conventional as to enable performance of all known duties to a fellow man, socialism becomes a religion).Webster's New World Dictionary - Fourth College Edition uses a slightly different vantage on Bouvier’s “fellow men” by stating, Religion is: “a.) any specific system of belief and worship, often involving a code of ethics and a philosophy [the Christian religion, the Buddhist religion, etc.] b.) any system of beliefs, practices, ethical values, etc. resembling, suggestive of, or likened to such a system [humanism as a religion] ⋯ any object of conscientious regard and pursuit”Religions are recognizable by their tenets, by terse example: clothe the naked, feed the hungry, house the homeless, finance the indigent, aide the sick and otherwise afflicted, regulate religious sacraments such as marriage, and aide and abet human sacrifice to the gods of pleasure and life style. Religions are also recognizable by their dogma canons outside the laws of nature and of nature’s God (absolute law such as gravity, physics and that which concerns life, liberty and property). Socialism and Democratic Socialism are demonic examples of religion – complete with canon enforcement.Merging governments of law with a premise by and acts of religion creates a theocracy. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land is nothing more than an area defined specific application of the prevailing theocracy’s whole (Socialism and Democratic Socialism are driving tumors therein).A neopagan macabre is the New World Order’s ecosphere establishment of religion. All subdivisions and otherwise ancillary elements of the here subject religion (“A”theism to “Z”en – death cults, demonic denominations, socialism/democratic socialism {progressives/eco-patrons/communists to neocons/fascists/corporatism, etc.}, useful idiots and their supporting isms, ecclesiastical propagators {MSM, seminaries/government schools, etc.}, along with all colluding auxiliary actors - “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”, etc., etc., etc.) are at war, in all ways, with the laws of nature and of nature’s God, a personal sovereign’s inalienable rights, true liberty, equity, justice and mercy.

Mike, Norwalk

The enlightened statesmen here spoken of would be the same as today's one world bankers that believe control of a nation’s money far exceeds any condition of laws made. It is in fact, the character and nobility of the sovereign individual, with intact inalienable rights and liberty that is the most productive source of national wealth and accordingly, has become the primary object of tyrants' political and religious cares.

Mike, Norwalk

Editor, thank you for all you do and your continued efforts  great quotes.

Mike, Norwalk

WOW!!! That a black robed high priest of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land would elaborate so accurately is almost beyond belief.

Mike, Norwalk

Secular humanism is a religion.

Mike, Norwalk

Though fairly accurate, the question has to be ask  out of what side of his mouth is here speaking here? The macabre death cults that sacrifice the un/newly-born to the gods of pleasure and life style, mandatory birth control, structuring what a religion can look like or say (by example 501 (c)3), forced almsgiving/dole, PC speech, etc., etc., etc. all being national establishment of religion religious orthodoxy within a theocracy.

Mike, Norwalk

okay  I'm sure in context, it has a specific meaning beyond the here seeming broad generality.

Mike, Norwalk

Well-meaning???  AGAIN ! ! !,  Liberty is: “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) Liberty is the “exemption from extraneous control. The power of the will, in its moral freedom, to follow the dictates of its unrestricted choice, and to direct the external acts of the individual without restraint, coercion, or control from other persons. Liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1st ed.). Clarifying original fact, natural law intent, and de jure jurisprudence: “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” (Thomas Jefferson) “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property ⋯ and is regarded as inalienable.” (16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987).  

In a land of individual sovereigns with inalienable right and "LIBERTY", where it is professed "liberty and justice for all"  how well meaning is it to violate the laws of nature and of nature's God and the moral underpinnings of all body politic, individual freedom and societal betterment when non-criminal religious practices are forbidden?

Mike, Norwalk

The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's war on religion (other than its own establishment) places Christianity at the top of its hit list. Said theocracy now calls evil good, and good evil, puts darkness for light, and light for darkness and puts bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Christianity’s understanding of life’s nobility (“But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;”) and respect of the laws of nature and of nature’s God, inalienable right and liberty are declared immoral and unacceptable by increasing canons.

Mike, Norwalk

Natural law ultimately supersedes carnal man's tyranny. Inalienable rights exist, even in the most enslaved and down-trodden. No matter the administration of theocratic despots, the noble being will eventually seek liberty.

Mike, Norwalk

We hold this truth to be self evident.

Mike, Norwalk

We hold this truth to be self evident.

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk jim k, Austin (8/23/19)

jim, I agree but, under the patron mentality of the evangelists (government school teachers) within the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land there has been a secular humanist / progressive religion well established contrary to the establishment clause of the Constitution. I think, maybe to 11th and 12th graders, an overview of differing religions should be taught to avoid the fear of ignorance.

Mike, Norwalk

The establishment clause is: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...". The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has violated the 1st half of the clause, the 2nd half of the clause  the whole of the clause. An immoral progressive religion continues to grow through legislation, court rulings and executive action. And second, other religions are disallowed use or presence within the occupying statist theocracy's immediate influence. Through centralized government of control, religions foreign to the statist theocracy infesting this land as a whole owns and controls through established rule  IRS 508, 501c3, etc.

Mike, Norwalk

I've on many occasion given legal and other definitions on this blog of religion and law. When man's morality is legislated, a theocracy is born. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land allows no competing religion (unless a temporary benefit is foreseen or contemplated).

Mike, Norwalk

Government studies, even under theocratic anti-gun oversight, consistently show guns are used far more in defensive postures (saving lives and protecting against injury) than in criminal / accidental death or injury. Man as a specie, has an innate sense of violence that can be utilized to inhance good and bad  certain tools exaggerate the result.

Mike, Norwalk

President Reagan's description of what was called liberal was correct. Today, I hear the conservative's weak voice clambering about right to life and arms. I hear very little concerning inalienable rights, individual sovereignty and liberty being done away with by compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, Social Security, police State confiscations, etc.) and the ever expanding of centralized government maintaining a perfected allodium over all property and governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.

Mike, Norwalk

I'm not quite sure how to rate this; 5 stars for accuracy or a thumbs down for an observation of the reality. Economically, if something is continually financed, it will grow  it doesn't matter if it is debt, poverty, the breakup of the family or degradation of the noble being.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Robert, somewhere in the USA (8/16/19)

Robert, speaking of illusions  you must be a modern progressive because, I know you've read my posts here over the years making your statement an out right prevarication. What would draw you to a conclusion that I think we live in an ideal country, that I think the administrators of major corporations give a damn about their workers? Ummm, 32.1%, / 7.8% of what? (is it true that 98.675 of all percentages are made up?)

What do you account for the current disparity in the rich vs. the poor. I attribute it to socialism's enslavement of the masses. I agree, the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land is far more fascist than it was in 1984. I've mentioned that when I was in business, a plant I had in the Los Angeles area cost more than 25% to produce product than in other States (even when wages were greater in other States) just because of socialist regulation. After everything I've said about the war mongering and colonization for oil, power and other immoral reasons why would you indicate that I believe something else.

I'm sorry, I think you are an idiot (actually, I've know you to be very bright) and extremely ignorant as to human nature, fiscal natural law and socialism. What more socialism could be added to the U.S. that would solve the socialist problems you have identified. The current government is a crime syndicate operating under communism, fascism and other forms of socialism.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.