Sillik, believing socialism to be a moral or correct existence translates the tenets of religion into a religion itself. Because socialism can NOT follow a linear truth, those professing such religion must alter definitions continually to continue a lie (as do you). Your personal claim is to be the unique messiah of socialism - making you a god by definition (a theocratic leader; even high priest / god). Sillik, your statement: “If you are ever to bring me to the court room like you say and ask me to bring a god to the witness stand, I will have to admit I simply don't have one”; is a lie - by definition, you are there, in your full god status.

Religion is: a sacrosanct object of conscience (an ethic(s), a moral(s), a value (system) or an orientation of correctness / enlightenment) believed sufficiently conventional as to enable an attributable action(s). Religion’s initiating elements of conscience, through fruition of action, encompasses self-obligated pursuits, imperative practices and devoted interests outside law of nature’s absolutes. When such enabling fundamentals are drawn upon or referenced as authority, an issue of correctness, power, reason or logic to exert specific actions (ordinances, rules, statutes, a mandated action, etc.), a formal religion is established. A ‘god’, ‘causation’ or other ‘relegated source’ of such enabling elements may or may not be instrumental (or even useful) in defining religion.

Religion is: “real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to ⋯ our fellow men.” (Bouviers Law Dictionary) Webster's New World Dictionary - Fourth College Edition uses a slightly different vantage on Bouvier’s “fellow men” by stating, Religion is: “a) any specific system of belief and worship, often involving a code of ethics and a philosophy [the Christian religion, the Buddhist religion, etc.] b) any system of beliefs, practices, ethical values, etc. resembling, suggestive of, or likened to such a system [humanism as a religion] ⋯ any object of conscientious regard and pursuit”. Buddhism and Humanism do not claim authority of correctness from an extra-corporeal domain; - they are religions with with no such gods (much like socialism)

The concept of a god is but an indicating element, category, or tenant that may or may not be useful in revealing or identifying religion. For example; A concept of, or the word ‘God’ never developed in the Hebrew covenant society (there being only a sacred relationship between Father and child - ‘el’ being a powerful executor: i.e. a mayor, a governor, a demon, a person of strength such as Sampson, etc.) and was only adapted by forces and influences outside the covenant experience (such as by Egypt’s influence - an early attempt to communicate with captors; much like slaves with their socialist overlords). As such, Jesus, by carnal understandings and use, is a God to Christians while not being a god to other belief systems or religions, even though the Christ’s teachings are honored as good and His secular laws are recognized as a founding jurisprudence (gravity, science, physics, fiscal law, life, liberty and property / “the laws of nature and of nature’s God”).

Because the Christian God is inter-dimensional and eternal (science proving there being multi-dimensions), your socialist court has no authority or ability to call on such entity’s presence. Such socialist court claims sufficient authority and ability to call all temporal entities to bear. In that court, would you as a socialist call your socialist god to the stand? Your childish attempt at legal procedure and/or logic holds no validity or sense in the real world. It is obvious by your rejection of science, truth and all things substantive that you are an empty vessel incapable of progressing beyond a baby’s delusions. Not understanding the terms of this quote (freedom, justice, education, etc.) you are inadequate in addressing such.

The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land indoctrinates from cradle to grave. The house of world order's ANTI-individual sovereignty / inalienable rights / liberty / perfected allodium at nature's law, along with competing religions is/are only superseded by its perversity. Socialism, with its inbred Stockholm Syndrome is a major component thereof. Though there be no national or federal common law by original definition, the common law principle of bottom to top is recognized as an absolute and utilized by the demonic oligarchs.

Sillik, you need to broaden your circle of conversationalists. It would behoove you to speak with people who have IQs in the double digits and not just stupid socialists.

An overly auspicious view from an optimistic noble individual. By way of example: a press that is free to print/say the truth is also free to print / say some/anything contrary thereto. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has a propaganda ministering machine (MSM) that promotes socialism — absolutely contrary to safety, freedom, individual sovereignty and inalienable rights at nature's law. I believe there to be the possibility of an independent press today, capable of relaying truth along with liberty, rights and nature's law, BUT it is just not happening.

Sillik, you are an ignorant theologian propagating the degradation of a noble specie. Your definition of rational, and realities definition of rational are diametrically opposed. By example: it has been shown that those who learn to play musical instruments at a young age do much better in math later on; those that play sports early (and continue) do much better with memory and in science. Of course socialists can't stand a better society — they only understand control and enslavement.

David, for this discussion, education would have to be defined. The current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land indoctrinates rather than educates. Desired status here may also play a part in being a slave or a freeman with education only being an indicator. For example, socialists — regardless of IQ, demonstrate a form of mental illness that rationalizes enslavement over freedom, from a theocratic position; is that education?

Waffler, I smile. Carter was a prime example of the quote's accuracy. Carter's socialist implementations went a long way to destroying a financially vibrant system.

Differing theologies, expressed through enslaving quips (such as: a government of the people, by the people and for the people) promote totalitarian despots later rationalizations. A knowledge of what nature's law "IS" (with related common law applications), has been replaced with/by theocratic philosophies of maritime jurisdictions on the land, fiendish socialism, legal positivism and other totalitarian/anti-law ideologies.

Colleges, Universities, schooling in general are today a function of, and looked upon as mere theocratic seminaries to satisfy the doctrinal needs of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land. Math, science, history, philosophy, religion, liberty, etc. are limited / expanded to uniquely fill the perspective of a carnal gods' oligarchy. Those graduating in underwater basket weaving are unneeded cogs in the carnal gods' enslavement (of mind, body and spirit) of the noble specie.

Archer, I like it a lot ;-) you have to be a duality to operate creatively. hmmm

Sillik, hahaha, lololol — demonic maybe, delusional absolutely. Your mentally ill double speak (contradicting yourself at most every chance) couched in circular word salad only begins to describe your uniqueness. Human qualities of reason ? ? ? — (-; like, you can only be your ultimate self if you are a social plural — I say hmmm ;-). AND / WHILE, you have all the opportunity you desire "to explain how I (you) did it" here in this space; BUT / WHILE, it is only another fragment of your plurality that won't let you and is telling one of your personalities that you are the devil. Again, hahaha, lololol ;-) nobody in this reality has called you the devil.

An astute in the obvious observation.

Alencon, I guess it is all in how you define "valid" and "principle". Stare decisis is today a tool used to expand usurpation and tyranny while avoiding Constitutional law.

Jack, how are you defining "law"? What the court says about the Constitution is NOT law — while, liking it or not does not enter into the subject matter. Personally, I may not like it but, it is the supreme usurpation and tyranny of the land, NOT law (uniquely enforced through threat of imprisonment, confiscation or death).

Lincoln's — of, by and for the people was a socialistic lie and unconstitutional illegality that is the basis of the occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land. We individual sovereigns are NOT the government. My wants and circumstances are different than yours (whom ever you are) so, representing me physically as a person can only be antagonistic to you. Each and every individual sovereign has the same sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. The de jure States united was to be a republican form of representation where hired persons within a body politic was to represent each person's sovereignty, rights and liberty at nature's law; NOT each person personally (an impossibility).

The "A" from Reston, spoken like a true communist. If one is looking for support and expansion of theocratic slavery, that search epitomizes government seminaries' (schools) / socialism indoctrination (positive experience). If IQ expansion, knowledge, truth, prosperity, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law measure a positive experience, government seminaries is/are NOT the answer. The statist theocracy's government seminaries (K — ...) are indoctrination centers to supply carnal gods with obedient cogs. That which is called continuing education (college, university, etc.) is nothing more than trade schools to supply the statist theocracy's desired direction for its/their perception of advancement.

I have close friends who had 19 children and home schooled them all. Their home school was so good that a local high school sent many of their problem students to be educated at my friends home school. A couple of my friends boys ended up as ministers (in different denominations), while each of the other kids have also done well to honor their parents and life's most noble ideals. The statist theocracy infesting this land, with its seminaries (government schools) has an educational standard that is lessoning each year in direct proportion to the Woke indoctrination of demonic socialism being inculcated to an innocent youth.

Sillik, I agree with your statement, "No one is fit to be a slave" Socialism IS slavery, NOT freedom. Your circular word salad promotes slavery (socialism) that is antithetical to freedom. Socialism is an absolute challenge to freedom. Freedom is not created, it is a natural consequence of an individual's expression through nature's law. Out of one side of your mouth you paraphrase Hitler's social abilities while out of the other side of your mouth you promote Lenin's "a lie told often enough becomes the truth" - when you falsely attempt to conceal your goals by speaking of individual freedom.

karen, you are correct. People today follow (does) the enslaving dictates of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land (sheeple genuflect to compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, etc.) and NON-recognition of perfected allodium (absolute ownership), inalienable rights, individual sovereignty and liberty at the laws of nature and of nature's God (Declaration of Independence)! ! !

Joseph, how many of our wonderful agnostic, atheist, socialist, indigenous, forefathers of color bought and sold slaves? Why is Africa still the largest area where the slave trade is still alive and well? Was the black president elected because he was black or because he was an AC/DC socialist? The majority of the Amerikan society has no knowledge of freedom, their history or what rights are.

Robert, I say hmmmm. Not much difference.

Waffler, following the admonition of one of your sociliast gods — "Lenin" (tell a lie often enough and it becomes the truth). Archer did NOT say "of the prhase {phrase}", Archer said "I have never heard of 'community schools,". The phrase is used by socialists everywhere.

Sillik, legally — licensing would make parenting a criminal act under all circumstances (i.e., a society of criminals). A review audience acceptable to you would be far different than an audience acceptable to me (I would not participate in a review audience). By example: I home schooled all of my children; and, my eldest started university at age 13 (soon turning 14) and competed nationally in sports. I now have 4 grand children from that child and all are educationally advanced beyond their immediate peers. That could not have happened in your criminal / socialist review system.

Sillik, your off topic circular word salad is a diversion in the impossible. You CAN'T censor or prohibit Archer's input on this blog! — This blog is not based on socialism and you have NO sway as to what the editor will here allow. Sillik, you once said you would not say anything you could not prove. Please prove, by scientific measure, how any form of socialism (even yours) promotes mental order, prosperity or science / nature's law. In the past, you have called for censorship — how do you scientifically prove censorship is NON-censorship?

Compelled compliance, victimless crimes, all government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, arbitrary confiscations, etc.), lack of recognition of individual sovereignty / inalienable rights (including private property perfected allodium) / liberty / nature's law and totalitarian tyranny are all enforcements (contrary to the Constitution) of the statist theocracy infesting this land and supported by Kit's god complex.