Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Print this Page [1-25] of NaNPosts from Mike, NorwalkMike, Norwalk 2 Reply Mike, Norwalk 4/17/26 re: Jorg Guido Hulsmann quote WOW, a very accurate observation proved out over, and, over, and over again. Welcome to Amerika, welcome to the world. Reply Mike, Norwalk 4/16/26 re: Wright Patman quote oops, I forgot to rate it. 1 Reply Mike, Norwalk 4/16/26 re: Wright Patman quote Oh that the chattel would rise was accurate. Those that genuflect at the alter of an idiotic debt system as willing helots, serfs and slaves will continue their idol worship in the forms provided them. Logic and reason will not supersede religion as long as supporting practitioners of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land rely on carnal gods services and tyranny. 1 Reply Mike, Norwalk 4/16/26 re: Frederick Soddy quote Said well, we hold this truth to be self evident. 2 Reply Mike, Norwalk dawn, Portland (4/13/26) dawn, health care becomes the responsibility of the government when it rejects the secular "laws of nature and of nature's God" and implements "legal positivism's" philosophies mingled with religion. Reply Mike, Norwalk Dave Wilber, St. Louis (4/13/26) Dave, how would you explain or define "the chains of the Constitution"? 1 Reply Mike, Norwalk Waffler, Smith (4/5/26) Waffler, lololol / hahahaha, a fairly accurate observation. The more despotic totalitarianism, tyranny, enslavement, etc. you pay for, the more you get (loosing inalienable rights, liberty at nature's law, etc.). Paying orchestral gods for their song of usurpation does conclude with; "You get what you pay for !" Reply Mike, Norwalk 4/5/26 re: John Maynard Keynes quote In context, the quote has some merit. In a broad (out of context) rating, it would be a definite thumbs down. For those that regard all taxes to be equal — you are the problem. The enslavement of the second plank of the communist manifesto is not the same as non-personal duties, imposts and excises. Reply Mike, Norwalk Logan, Memphis, TN (3/31/26) 🥳 Reply Mike, Norwalk William Leslie, Sandy, Oregon (3/31/26) William, an FYI correction; your giant leap concerning legal persons is incorrect. Corporations, LLCs, etc. are owned by government(s). Corporations are administered through allowed parties and associations along with varying conditions subject to their owner's codes, ordinances, regulations, rules, statutes, etc. Reply Mike, Norwalk H. Clinton, WDC (3/31/26) I'm not so sure it is "old and out of date" as much a lying subterfuge on its face. The accountant above mentioned (now passed) went to prison for doing exactly what the cloaked in the black rob high priest of the dark priesthood stated. The primary argument against the accountant was that he was stealing from the government because without his expertise, his clients wouldn't know all the right-offs. None of his right-offs or returns were altered by the IRS (stood as filed). Reply Mike, Norwalk Jim, Warner Robins, GA (3/31/26) Jim, spoken like a stupid slave that enjoys his position and some one that believes what his godly masters tell him. I've done extensive research on the 16th Amendment for court presentation and found the Amendment was never legally ratified. That case made it to court, was called out on recess and never resumed (over 40 years ago). If the 16th Amendment were legally ratified, it would eliminate the de jure State united as a "republican form of government", a government of laws and any semblance of actual inalienable rights and liberty. AND, by "constitutional", did you mean by "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence); OR, did you mean religious canons by the illegitimate occupying statist theocracy infesting this land? 1 Reply Mike, Norwalk Terry Berg, Occidental, CA (3/31/26) Terry, how do you define "Christian Based Republic"? Is your definition based in religion? Mine wasn't ! ! ! A "Republic" is a secular expression. Your ignorance is so pervasive it flows through a membrane of truth totally unrecognized. In a Christian Based Republic is: each and every individual is recognized as a noble sovereign — son/daughter of Eternity's King (at nature's law, no one being greater or lesser than another). The 2nd plank of the communist manifesto is a religious canon that makes each sovereign a slave to carnal god's deadly power to harm. 1 Reply Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (3/30/26) When under any system of government, where a man (woman) does not own his own labors (or the fruits thereof) there is slavery. When the once noble heirs to the Eternal King are consider mere chattel / property to be dealt with as carnal gods please (at law makers' whim), individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law are more than just lost — they are not recognized. Helots, serfs and otherwise dupes rationalize their captivity choosing a deluded status beneath their regal status, genuflecting within their internment of fleshly gods. 1 Reply Mike, Norwalk Waffler, Smith (3/26/26) NO ! that is not apropos! Religions such as socialism live as long as other people's money holds out. Religion, not nature's law, is recognized by its feeding the hungry, healing the sick, clothing the naked, financing the indigent, housing the homeless, etc. The de jure States united was to be a secular republican form of government — creating codes, ordinances, regulations, rules, statutes, etc. (from law that already existed naturally) that organized advancement and protection of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. The current occupying statist theocracy infesting this land creates religious canons (not elements of nature's law) expanding it "establishment of religion" contrary to nature's law. Reply Mike, Norwalk Waffler, Smith, Arkansas (3/26/26) Waffler, I for one (and I know others) qualify for not sharing in plunder. My story once again, when I was so poor my young family did not have as much as a vehicle to sleep in and was going hungry. I did NOT (nor did my family) indulge ourselves in the occupying statist theocracy's plunder. 1 Reply Mike, Norwalk Anonymous, Reston, VA US (3/25/26) The "A" from Reston; are you saying rich people don't bathe or what is your definition of rich that would make someone on your list / definition filthy? Reply Mike, Norwalk David L. Rosenthal, Hollywood (3/25/26) 🤣🥳 2 Reply Mike, Norwalk Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown (3/17/26) Sillik, hahahaha, lolololol you are a prime example of one that Harriet Tubman would free from slavery if you but knew (knows) what slavery is. Your avowed socialism is a supreme example of slavery. Your religious dogma of controlled group think is antithetical to individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature’s law. 2 Reply Mike, Norwalk Bryan Morton, Stuart, FL (3/17/26) Bryan, maybe? Your comment is absolutely UNknowable under current conditions. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has so sufficiently replaced knowledge of nature's law / natural law / common law / inalienable rights / liberty / a "republican form of government" — with — their own religious dogmas, that the majority of voters are without rain, thunder and lightning to vote on. 1 Reply Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (3/17/26) It is NOT ! ! ! the duty of the unelected / unconstitutional monopoly / anti-nature's law / anti-unalienable rights & liberty / ultimate determinants of what is law - bar/gods to be: thought police, nor those who have power to prevent or suppress ANYTHING. Reply Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (3/16/26) I liked Tupper Saucy, he was a good man 2 Reply Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (3/13/26) I have posted this multiple times. Early in my marriage, circumstances exposed that I had not as much as a vehicle for my young family to sleep in. We went hungry but would not take government assistance. I absolutely concur, it is; "Better to starve free than be a fat slave." Reply Mike, Norwalk Fredrick William Sillik, Anytown (3/13/26) Sillik, socialist dogma within their lying religion promotes slavery and eventually, all but a few starve. Reply Mike, Norwalk cal, lewisville,tx (3/12/26) cal, are you aware that slaves in the Old Testament was a policy denied by god but taken on by man, complete with using the rules of the surrounding societies. SaveOk2 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print