Don't feed the animals

"Animals that are fed lose…their ability to forage on their own. They often become overly aggressive and completely dependent on handouts. They start to look skinny and sickly and develop begging behaviors, which exacerbates the cycle further as visitors feel sorry for them…."

Russians were able to overthrow the tyranny of Czar Nicholas, III because they had guns, as many were armed veterans of World War I. Unfortunately, they established a new form of tyranny and confiscated guns from the masses so Russians now cannot overthrow the new one.

American Colonists were able to overthrow the tyranny of King George, III because they had guns, as many were armed hunters. Unfortunately, Leftists want to confiscate our guns and leave us defenseless against their form of tyranny.

On December 29, 1890, the Seventh Cavalry (U.S. Army) forcibly disarmed most of the Lakota Native Americans near the Wounded Knee Creek in South Dakota and then massacred approximately 300 men, women, and children in the group.

Since Democrats claim to be the compassionate party, isn’t it time for them to show a little compassion for the millions of disarmed people murdered by their own governments?

If only that statement were always true.  After negotiating a contract between the States and the newly formed Federal Government, the Feds quickly usurped the sole power to determine whether there has been any breach of the contract.

We need a separation of school and state.

We don't need religion in government schools; we need government out of schools.  We need to destroy government's monopoly on education with vouchers and a separation of school and state.

We need a separation of school and state.

Leftists cry over the murders of a few innocents by miscellaneous criminals, as they should.  However, they fail to cry over millions of innocents who were disarmed and murdered by their governments, and they fail to acknowledge that guns in the hands of law abiding citizens could have prevented a lot of those murders.   

Leftists are eliminating the word "republic" from our vocabulary as part of their successful efforts to sell the lie that our republic is a "wonderful democracy".  In truth, de-mob-ocracy is an evil form of government which allows a simple majority to vote your money into my pocket.

http://www.diffen.com/difference/Democracy_vs_Republic

I say that one major root is our acceptance of the lie that our republic is a "wonderful democracy".  It only takes a majority in a real, direct or representative, de-mob-ocracy to vote your money into my pocket.

The successful promotion of de-mob-ocracy is a prime example of how to sell a lie to people who have been “educated” in government schools. We need a separation of school and state.

B. Hussein's writers sure knew how to put lipstick on a pig.

If politicians (RINOs) tell the truth and then do nothing, they can get by relatively unscathed.  Woe be under one (Trump) who tells the truth and actually tries to do something about it.

The leftists (they aren't liberal or progressive) have done an incredible job of selling the lie that our republic is a "wonderful democracy."  If you confront them, you might be charged, as I was, with being an elitist who wants only the rich to be able to vote.  However, the Greeks had a democracy where women and slaves could not vote, and we could have a republic with or without universal suffrage.  Democracy and universal suffrage are not identical.

There was a contract between thirteen states and a newly formed Federal Government.  Why is it that the Federal Government is the only body which can rule on whether it has violated that contract?

When I was in law school, we were not taught what the Constitution says.  We were taught the precedents--what judges had said the Constitution says.  Judges swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, but they protect and defend the precedents and their own political opinions.

If we forced our DC employees to obey it, they would have fewer favors to sell to lobbyists.  They would retire less wealthy, and we taxpayers could save a few more pennies for ourselves. 

So, does that mean that freedom of speech does not apply to talking on a telephone?  

And, should I have to apply for a permit to speak? What procedure must I follow to apply for freedom from cruel and unusual punishment?

Yeah, right! The rest of the world is a higher MORAL authority--sure.

Far too many people want us to be governed by the International Association of Dictators and Tyrants--the IADT, also known as the UN.

The left and right wings of Control Freaks Unanimous reject the republic our brilliant founders mandated in Article 4, Section 4.  They support a "wonderful" de-mob-ocracy in hopes of gaining that magic majority so they can use the state to make everyone its servant and march in lockstep with them.

"Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered".  We have been fighting the tyranny of socialism for a long time and have not conquered it yet.  Back before it got its current name, settlers in this country were thankful (Thanksgiving) for survival after changing from a system of common wealth to one of freedom of enterprise and private ownership.  Some states still call themselves Commonwealths today.

And it would be ruled by one government, the International Association of Dictators and Tyrants, a/k/a the UN.

I repeat, we need a separation of school and state.

Can anyone prove any negative statement?

The left and right wings of Control Freaks Unanimous disagree with this statement.