If only the supporters of Planned Parenthood and abortion-on-demand truly understood the origins of this heinous practice!  The rabbit hole goes to places you never imagined — child sacrifice!  Remember, the likes of Bill Gates' (an unapologetic eugenicist) stated goal is the reduction of the world population to 500 million people — and you ain't one of them.

Good Lord, Fred THE socialist, I can't think of a more "bizarro" interpretation of socialism in my life!  History literally demonstrates the exact opposite of everything you have said.

Hundreds of millions of citizens have been murdered by their own governments in the name of socialism in its several forms.  It is by far the most violent political philosophy ever proffered — "by any means necessary" is its creed.  It is a religion in and of itself always claiming the moral high ground while it tramples upon the natural born rights of everyone. 

Such ignorance is uncanny.  Such hypocrisy has no equal.  Such narcissism is way too common...

'Methinks thou protesteth too much."

Right and Left are merely different ends of the socialist scale. Conservatives are not 'right-wing', they are above the socialist scale entirely.  They are the true Liberals in the classic liberalism sense, like the Founding Fathers — probably called Libertarians today.

Ya think?!  Margaret Sanger's purpose of founding what became Planned Parenthood was to quite literally extinguish the black race from America.  Over 50% of black pregnancies in NYC are aborted today.  Millions upon millions of black unborn babies have been aborted due to the fully government-supported effort.

I don't know what the heck you are talking about...  just more 'logorrhea' — a tendency to speak or write excessively and incoherently, often without consideration for clarity or understanding.

Sillik's ranting reminds me of the Adam Sandler movie Billy Madison.  After Billy's presentation, the principal says:

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

Fred, seek help.  I doubt you are married or have children.  It sounds like you were committed to a mental institution, yes?  Your ideas are not new, your definition of socialism and a 'maximum' wage are easily found in the writings of Marx and Engels.  All these responses without ever defining 'social responsibility.'  Nothing but logical fallacies and narcissism.  I truly feel sorry for you.  Nothing you have written is 'rational' ...

15 years later... yet to be implemented... the results speak for themselves.  Whoever dreamed that today, parents would be suing each other for custody in order to change the sex of their young child. 

I have attended public, private, and Catholic schools, and can honestly say the public schools were the most indoctrinating of all and bastions of 'black privilege' so much so I wished to be black and adopted their mannerisms  My mother would say, 'stop acting black!' 

I am very thankful for my private schooling, otherwise I would not have gotten the education I did based on merit.  I wanted to excel rather than hold myself back as I did in public school where my nickname was 'Einstein' which was not meant to be endearing but to ridicule.  To be smart and white made me a target for harassment — still true today, unfortunately.

Hence the call to censor "misinformation" and "disinformation" by the government and media 'for our own good' no doubt.  But how many 'conspiracy theories' have turned out to be true? 

It is not nor has it ever been one of the duties of republican government to regulate speech or the press — in fact, it is specifically prohibited from doing so, see the 1st Amendment.

"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."  Wisdom indeed.

Fred, I can't find "social responsibility" in the dictionary, so I can't readily be committed to it.  What is it?  Am I my brother's keeper?  By what authority is one's 'social responsibility' declared?

The primary law of nature is "As I sow, so shall I reap."  It is immutable except by some form of forgiveness or atonement — indeed acts in and of themselves the 'sowing' of which negates the original 'reaping.'  

Our acts matter and have consequences, good or bad, and I think that's what you are referring to, that we have a 'responsibility' to each other because what goes around, comes around.  And I'm all for exercising compassion towards one another — it is the heart of a republican form of self government.  Whereas a socialist government places the responsibility in some authority's hands to whom the rest must obey — and I suppose in your form, that would be YOU.  Self-government starts with the individual being responsible for him/herself and all are equally responsible for themselves.

Too often your expressed political philosophy resembles some form of authoritarianism much like the Catholic Church of old, except YOU are the Creator.  But let me quote Obama, "you didn't build that." And you are not responsible for me.

That's why the spiritual path has been referred to as that of Liberation.  It's the truth that makes us free.

Yes, when will "Freedom" actually be put back into practice in America?  I do think an awakening is occurring, but without a significant independent study of history among not only the people but their representatives, it will be more of the same.  I like Javier Milei's methods — just fire 80% of government offices and return to an non-interest bearing currency that is backed by real capital or GDP.  The day we seize the assets of the Federal Reserve will be the true day of Liberty!

Yes, and we must be free to make mistakes in order to learn from them.

Fred, I don't know what to make of your reply because it is filled with a conclusion without an argument.  How do you know what I am involved in?  What is the "arrangement of an imperialistic exploiters mob"?  You and I may agree that a "respectable situation" would be ideal — but without defining what that is, it is just a subjective generality, commonly spoken by 'imperialistic exploiters' to gain support without actually explaining what it means. 

I totally agree to the notion of an honest day's pay for an honest day's work — as agreed by both parties.  Let those that agree or not determine if the work is dignified.

There are just too many subjective generalizations in your posts, and not enough real substance or clear argument to have an intelligent conversation with you.  You spout platitudes — this is not conversation. 

Treat people the way you'd like to be treated.  No one wants to be preached to.  Make your argument clearly without projecting upon others your opinions as fact, please.  That will go a long way to being understood.  Be prepared for a dialogue of alternate perspectives.  If the intent is to find common ground, I believe we will find it.  If the intent is just to preach and judge others, treat them as mentally disturbed, children, etc. while ignoring your own childish and illogical rants, then you are just flapping your gums trying to sound intelligent.

I'm sure you have some insight in there somewhere, it's just hard to recognize amidst such posturing.  Sometimes less is more...

Whenever I hear the phrase "our democracy" I cringe.  It is a fallacious description of American government.  Freedom to read and freedom to publish does not necessarily promote freedom.  Lies, misdirection, opinions stated as facts, banned books all play a part in the "programming" of a people.  Be discerning with the programming offered you — it is no accident.

Good luck with ALL that...

I would say the same for Christians — the seven deadly sins come to mind.

And "think" not "thing" ... ;-)

Mike, I don't think 'THE Socialist' is ever going to get it, nor does he want to.  He's merely the devil's advocate — it's the only reason he is here.  Never rates a quote, never agrees with classic philosophers or founding fathers — calls them delusional.  I used to feel sorry for him, even tried to engage with him in simple terms, but he defends his delusion with words he has no idea of the meaning.  Most likely he is posting from a mental institution living off government subsidy — he so often has to tell us what mentally ill is that he must be closely associated with psychologists and mental health practitioners daily.  He doesn't even call himself a socialist, he calls himself "THE" socialist and that no one has ever known his version of socialism (including himself, I would wager).  Yet everything he professes is straight-up authoritarian, progressive liberal hypocrisy.

I don't know who is more insane, Fred or you and I for even trying to navigate his mental mine field. ;-)

Ingersoll was a brilliant orator who could speak extemporaneously for hours in the days when those that mastered rhetoric ruled.  Would that we had such today.

You are confusing Freedom with Power, Fred (as most atheistic socialists do...)

Good grief, now Samuel Adams is delusional?  I suppose the rest of the Continental Congress, too?  You truly are a socialist, Fred, an ungrateful, petty, ignorant, arrogant and foolish socialist.

Talk about mentally ill...

Because the game is rigged, Joe.  It has been for a long time.  Either the people will wake up and rise up, or more debt and oppression will be laid upon us.

"Name one depressed and cowardly Socialist you've met."  All of them, Fred, and quite frankly, your ranting inspires little.  You place yourself above us all, have expressed that we deserve only the freedom we have "earned" by your own measure.  Your comments express arrogance, ingratitude, cowardice, envy, blame, conceit and never fail to mock those who are your total and complete opposite.  You, sir, are a hypocrite of the highest order.  Your narcissism stinks to high-heaven — all the signs of a depressed and cowardly individual.