Read the article from which this quote comes, it's right on.
https://english.pravda.ru/opinion/122849-obama_soviet_mistake/

Interesting observation.  It's "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" doctrine.  ;-)

Brilliant analysis, Fred...  You have proffered nothing but logical fallacies to make your 'argument.' 

The most logical conclusion is that your "subconscious [is] convinced of the untenability of [your] own doctrines."

Spoken like a true Marxist, Fred.  Equating John Adams with Barney Fife is absolutely insulting!  You are a bloated ignoramous!  Adams couldn't be more spot on regarding the responsibilities of the People about the encroachment of their rights. 

It is not the document's responsibility to protect us from the 'good intentions' from your socialist would-be demi-gods.  It is the common People — who are the targets of your utopian plans that apparently should be made more clear in these documents which you seem to believe a Constitution to be for, that is granting/transferring rights and power to people rather than protecting their God-given rights and property.  Your hubris stinks. 

I am absolutely tired of your totalitarian dribble spewed on this site every single day.  It is poison and a big middle finger in the face of everyone here who values Liberty over your socialist 'solutions' which are a death knell to our posterity.  makes me want to gag!  Why don't you take a vacation for a couple months, please.  Good Lord help me.

The mental disorder is 100% yours Fred.  You couldn't pass a math class if you had a +/-5% room for error.

Speaking of which, how much of a mental disorder do you have to have to never question these MSM "polls" which say their results are +/-5% error-free?  That's a 10% error rate — or cheating rate more likely. 

There were 2 jars of candy with 100 pieces each.  100 people were asked to remove one piece of candy from either jar.  After every person was witnessed taking out one piece, the remaining pieces in each jar were counted.  There is 0% error if the total of the remaining jars is 100.  Anything else is a LIE and therefore INVALID.  In poker, the hand would be thrown out and maybe even a few players, too.

We have become too complacent with LIARS — they think we are dumb!  Sillik is not dumb — he is a COMMIE that lies to himself to cover up his arrogance and down-right evil heart.  

You got most of it right, Fred.  And FDR's New Deal is definitely fascist — as well as a form of socialism.  However, what you have countered as the antithesis is also a form of socialism, i.e., communism.

The only things fascism and communism are to the 'right' and 'left' of are each other. Yes, Fred William Silliik the Socialist, you are also THE Communist.  I had previously thought you might just be misguided, but it is clear to me now you are a very proud, died-in-the-wool, full-on Marxist. 

And I have never met one who wasn't a narcissistic authoritarian who would burn the world to the ground rather than respecting the mutual rights of his fellow man to live in Liberty and thankfulness for this miraculous gift we call "Life."

The Declaration of Independence is indeed America's founding pillar, still standing the test of time and is the touchstone of Liberty itself!  May more countries follow in this example.  The people of every country need to make this declaration for themselves, and America can truly support them in their defense against the globalist ruling class.  Let's make this declaration real for ourselves today and for generations to come!

Indeed!

Hear, hear!

The US Constitution and Bill of Rights are the best attempt to preserve republican government and protect the rights of the People who chartered it in human history.  The post-Civil War amendments mark the start of the "decay" culminating with a central bank ruling over all.  The transformation from republican to statist government relies 100% on the receivership of the USA to the Federal Reserve under a state of emergency that has never been lifted. 

Socialism, or more specifically one of its forms, fascism has replaced the American government model but only be default.  We need only reclaim our republic from this false leviathan that lays claims to the labors and property of all.  Socialism is a con self-evident to any who have tried to exercise responsibility for themselves without government approval or permission.

Servitude is still the biggest racket in the world — and socialism is the 'science' behind it.

The Founders despised a democracy as it would soon waste and exhaust itself in suicidal tendencies.  A republican form of government was established by the US Constitution to protect the natural born rights of the People from power-seeking men.  The greatest minority is the individual whose rights are paramount to the State.  Not everything is up for vote. 

Today's 'democrats' scream bloody murder if the 'republicans' are ever chosen by their representatives.  Democrats want one-party rule — just like other democracies in communist countries.  Scratch a 'democrat' and find an authoritarian.  The Founders knew!

Even more interesting is that the original quote concluded with:

"may the Republican Party, under God, from every mountainside, LET FREEDOM RING!"

It's never become more evident from the moment Trump entered the White House.  The Swamp has absolutely no shame, and the leftist prosecutors in Blue cities and states have waged a no-holds-barred assault on anyone who challenges their authoritarianism.

I think the Democrat AG's (federal and state) have now matched Stalin in more ways than I care to count!

I repeat, who are you talking to when you say "Implement the Maximum Wage"?  If your version of socialism requires no dictatorial power, how would such a thing be implemented/enforced?  If socialism is for freedom, explain how dictating wages fits in. 

Since you are the only real Socialist (as you claim) then please explain.  Please spare us the condescension and simply answer directly the questions.

Your narcissism knows no bounds, Fred.  Talk about psychotic... and just plain ol' ignorant. 

So is this your new tag line, "Implement the Maximum Wage"?  If you are not dictating, to whom exactly are you telling to implement it?  Your rhetoric is filled with dictates.  My "obligations for an ordered societal arrangement"?  Says who?!  (You, obviously.)  If you proscribe living in harmony with the Laws of Nature, I am with you.  But if I am obligated to live according to an ordered arrangement — i.e. not by consent — then once again you claim power and authority that is not yours, which is classic dictatorial socialism.

The subsistence of the remnants of liberty is unfortunately miniscule today, much in part due to compulsory government schooling. 

Today, few Americans truly value Liberty and understand the price of upholding it. Dependency and a sense of victimhood are central themes in today's education, especially in inner cities. Here, maintaining poverty among the poor serves as a lucrative scheme for politicians who enrich themselves through their positions and influence-peddling. It's the second oldest trick in the book, bearing a striking resemblance to the first.

I beg to differ. Socialism can ONLY be achieved by violence.  History bears witness to that fact.

Prescient.  Look at where America is today.  Warren was spot on 14 years ago.

Hardly a new principle from socialists to restrict the rights of others.  Hitler was a vegetarian, didn't smoke, and didn't drink alcohol — and he prohibited such being consumed around him.  What you fail to address is the "how" to eliminate recreational sex and drugs.  ;-)  Lofty is the ideal, it's the enforcement that is socialism. 

Fred, your version of socialism is nothing but a petty dictatorship — nothing new about it.

BTW "the challenge of social abilities to create the means of production" is not socialism, it's "capitalism."

Fred, "gaining control of myself" is not socialism, it is individualism, it is classic liberalism.  Freedom absolutely requires the responsibility of being in control of oneself and not being the subject of another's will. 

Please stop calling your approach 'socialism.'  You are mixing up self-determination and utopia.  There would be no way to impose a maximum or minimum wage without allowing oneself to give up self-determinism and to become subservient to an external authority.

I know you have got a lot invested in your motto "socialism is the challenge ..." but you will never reconcile freedom, independence, and personal responsibility with socialism — they are polar opposites and completely incompatible. 

Your heart is in the right place, only your proposals are authoritarian on their face and can never and will never accomplish anything but complete subservience to the state and to whomever seizes the seats of power and will dictate to the rest of us.

You're starting to get the picture, Fred, only you can't seem to accept that socialism is the cause of the ills, not the cure.  The slight of hand you are referring to with the use of fiat currency is a perfect example.  All socialist forms of government absolutely depend upon this trick.  It is a mind-boggling feat of deception that once realized exposes the system of power imposed upon the world.

Very simply, since 1913, the US, Canada, UK, and many other countries agreed to switch from hard currencies backed by gold and silver to a debt-based currency (called fiat currency) that is backed by a promise-to-pay — i.e. an IOU.  The 'money' doesn't exist until a borrower signs a promissory note (IOU) and the money is destroyed when the IOU is paid back.  Now every dollar, pound, yen, franc, peso, etc. in circulation is an IOU, an interest-bearing debt that someone somewhere is paying interest on.

The condition for this new money system was that gold would no longer be allowed to be used as money and in fact was confiscated by the central banks (private banks) in exchange for fiat currency they create out of thin air and 'loan' into circulation.  Capital was traded in for debt.  And an income tax system was introduced to guarantee the interest payments on the debt-based money.

This is socialism and in its newest incarnation appears as the "social credit system" slowly being introduced to replace the current issuance of debt (called credit) and put the populace under total control.  It's the mark of the beast on steroids — no one will be able to buy or sell outside this system.

As for the Doctors and Lawyers you mention, the fields of medicine and law have been completely usurped by this funny money system and the laws are written to protect the system and make the lawyers and doctors filthy rich.  Today, lawyers destroy law, doctors destroy health, and bankers destroy money.

Hitler introduced the Ministry of Propaganda to distract the populace from ever figuring out the scam.  Hollywood is the main propaganda arm of the US (and the world) along with the legacy media, Department of Education and the fields of psychology that promote the mesmerism necessary to keep the populace compliant. 

The current assault is upon energy (i.e. raw power) and food (fuel for the body).  The food supply has become tainted and processed food is literally poison.  The climate change scam has infiltrated all governments and every effort is being made to eliminate energy produced by oil, gas and coal and eventually 'fire' itself — to literally make us 'powerless.'

Socialism has made all this possible.  The challenge of socialism to to keep the populace completely ignorant of the true source of its power and to literally rule the world, and eliminate anyone and anything that stands in its way.

Please understand this, Fred.  The absolute control over labor, money, energy, food, knowledge — i.e. all forms of power — is the goal, and all too often your rhetoric mimics the same ideas of Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro and every other SOCIALIST dictator that has killed off hundreds of millions, if not billions, of people.  Please wake up.

I beg to differ.  With a maximum wage of $4.25 you have communism — and you will get what you pay for.  Ask the Soviets who suffered under such delusions for 75 years.  Welcome to authoritarian dystopia.

BTW, both communists and fascists call their form of government 'socialism,'  and your version is an infantile variation of the same.

(I still don't understand how you presume what is "my" popular music... Don't you realize you know nothing about me?) 

There appears to be no limit to your arrogance and ignorance.