I have read a lot of his stuff and he hasnt connected the dots properly. He was one of the first men to recognise the problem of grooming of Children in the Confessional. The Church at the time failed their parishioners by not stamping it out and that is properly the limit of their culpability. The key to stamping out this despicable practice of corrupting the innocents is to realise then as now that it is alive and well and is not restricted to the church. Hence his criticism of the Church was largely wasted because those who motivated his ire went unchecked and the historians have labelled him a crank instead of a champion of exploited children. The best evidence of this is the wikipaedia article about him. Hardly a monument fit for a man of great moral courage and passion. Hidden in his writings is the simplest way to deal with paedophiles Starve their lust by making your home a place of honor and respect so your children wont be drawn to these sickos.