In words that are not bullshit . . .

We judges can't leave out consideration of intent of the speech.
When said plainly, you can see he left out some shit about how the words can cause physical damage.

Better words: if the purpose was to cause a stampede where a crowd is ready to respond to an emergency warning... then string the fucker up.

Man I hate intellectual bullshit speech. Somebody ought to challenge his speech.

I have no idea what he had in mind.