What could be more of a freedom then true romantic love?

Is it not the human being status that remains the priority?

If you're not the forward force of the country, in essence the true government, do you really have case for love of your country, or anything else for that matter?

Is there not a positive correlation between freedom and independence?

I take responsibility for all my actions.

Government is as any relationship you're involved with, you love it and you treat it with care. With time and patience it will respond positively.

This makes little sense to me.  Anyone sincerely occupied and concerned with the public good is destined to bring forth more reasonably based responsible behavioral freedoms.

The United States of America has the human composition to move it forward.

Government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Mr. Archer.

Formal laws tend to have a quality of favorable bias attributed to them.

Agreed, that government that leads us to our true humanity, allows being ruled by our own hearts and minds will prove most effective.

Human integrity could emerge so effective for sustainment of human endowment that mental health would be quite efficient leading to no need for artificial constructive rules and regulations. Becoming more purely human leads to less necessity of formal rules, because of the natural goodness of the quintessential human being.

Reasonable based freedom will not flounder, if I read my Mr Spinoza correctly.

What would be the label given to this situation?

Who am I to disagree with Mr Baruch Spinoza, an individual described as one of the "lovable" characters of the past.

And would not a good father remind his son the potential of bringing wisdom to the world circumstances?

It's interesting the time they called the "great depression" would not insite curiosity into the circumstances of this "economic upheaval."

Doesn't following the crowd tend to lead us to misfortune?

Is the point here, that we should be more vigilant of misrepresentation and guard against it?

Is it possible individuals have much more influence on the governmental proceedings then they are aware, and are the primary source of these unnecessary burdens placed on them?

To be a free individual is a misnomer. With the varied climate of existence an individual is free corresponding to the circumstances one challenges in the different dimensional  contexts of the differing confinements. Put simply, it is wrong to say one is free, put correctly, one practices to be free.  Put even more transparent, freedom grows as does knowledge and understanding.

Restore or actually initiate that belief in yourself?

The independent individual has my full support.

Where there is the properly educated, there is liberty.

Humans realizes that what is good for them is good for the community, and what is good for the community is good for them.