[1-25] of 9895

Posts from Mike, NORWALK

Mike, NORWALKMike, NORWALK
Mike, Norwalk

Another of theocratic socialism's conversion technique(s).

Mike, Norwalk

Examples of shut minds and closed mouths with all of humanity in harm’s peril (psychological, spiritual, physical and in all ways) is the academics, propaganda and enforcement of compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, police state confiscations, funny money, social security, etc.), denial of perfected allodium (absolute ownership) and NON-recognition of inalienable rights and liberty at nature’s law.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, do you have any suggestions as concerning "other sources?" The current debt system is a close kin to theocratic socialism;  diametrically opposed to biblical principles and nature's law fiscal applications.

Mike, Norwalk

Kinda sorta almost accurate. The occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land has breeched the barrier between church and state. Those Biblical principles that extended from nature's law have all but been extinguished with carnal logic, reasoning and philosophies. Those that forget history are doomed to experience ANTI-prosperity.

Mike, Norwalk

We hold this truth to be self evident ! ! !

Mike, Norwalk

(-: it was the founding liberals that wanted to conserve nature's law with its corresponding principles.

Mike, Norwalk

I'm in full accord with the message: LET FREEDOM RING ! ! !

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, “I don’t understand your specific kind of stupid. But I do admire your total commitment to it.” (Morgan Freeman)

Mike, Norwalk

The "A" from Reston again promotes the prevalent Woke Theology's lying dogma. Each / every definition of liberty does not include any scenario or domain where a master / slave relationship exists. It almost amazes me how socialists need change the definition of words to fit their sick and twisted perversions.

Mike, Norwalk

Following the sequence of the phrase, each point individually, as stand alone concepts, are acceptable and even favorable. The / any Flag is mere symbology. “My” Flag would make it a symbolism of what “I” believe and stand for. Pledging an allegiance to self believed issues could even include a god. The conjunction “and”, then continues with an expansion and change of meaning. No longer does the Flag represent me or mine but rather “the Republic”. The “which it stands” transfers focus from self to the term “Republic” - which has multiple definitions. One of the "Republic's" meanings would be: The “Republican form of government” (Article 4, Section 4, U.S. Constitution); - said form is demonstratively antithetical to socialism. Said form includes individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature’s law; all being held sacrosanct. Liberty and Justice for all are noble and Divine pursuits. It reminds me of, the adversary will tell you a hundred truths to make you believe one lie. It is the brain washing application of the whole, especially by socialists, that makes the totalitarian relevance so repugnant.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, you gota love auto correct  Lenin

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, you truly are a socialist in the finest tradition of the word; AND, you follow so well after one of your many gods  Lennin: "a lie told often enough becomes the truth". In your propaganda, you must say day is night, black is white, front to back is inverted, demonic perversion is ethical, poverty is moral and slavery properly inflicted (socialism) is correct  for, that is truly how socialism progresses. One of the reasons you've never been able to use scientific methodology to answer any question ever posed to you is you have NO idea what that is. As stated to you many times, socialists must regularly change the meaning of words so not to be identified as the sadistic / mentally ill child that you are.

Mike, Norwalk

In a democracy, opposition is NOT tolerated. The Constitution (as orders a representative republic) is antithetical to democracy. In a democracy, all things that are contrary to the herd are dispensable.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, you are an childish imbecile that knows NOTHING of science and can only reference the subject matter in circular word salads that are too broad and vague to even consider. The social interactions you reference are religious by substance and effect. Socialism is: any of various economic, religious and political theories, philosophies or movements outside nature’s law advocating collective or governmental / religious ownership and administration of property (real / chattel / sensorial beings, etc.) along with the means of production and distribution of goods. When socialism is interfaced with in any degree of ethics, morals or perception of correctness, it becomes a religion (NOT science)

Mike, Norwalk

Amen, Amen and Amen ! ! !  We hold this truth to be self evident.

Mike, Norwalk

In America (now the world) the demonically Woke Theologians with a socialist agenda came for individual sovereigns (those that loved and lived with inalienable rights and liberty at nature’s law), and I didn’t speak up loudly enough because I was able to live sufficiently free by being adept at legal proceedings for myself. Then they came for the climate deniers. I didn’t speak up because I knew the climate naturally changes. Then they came for the polluters. I didn’t speak up because I didn’t personally identify as a polluter. Then they came for the Catholics, but I didn't speak up because I wasn’t Catholic. Now that they are coming for Jews and Christians, there is no lawfully legitimate jurisdiction to apply to.

Mike, Norwalk

Using an uneducated street understanding of crime, we hold this truth to be self evident.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, hahaha / lololol you've had NO mentally healthy responses  EVER (to be amazed or not). So, by your definition, I'm living the laws of humanity because I exist. Socialism is ultimately anti-laws of humanity. Your circular word salad does not qualify as a real definition.

Mike, Norwalk

(-; jim ;-)  knowing, layers get paid by the word, you are absolutely correct. 

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, it is "almost" amazing to me that you can't EVER answer a single question. What are laws of humanity? What law or philosophy of law am I abiding? "demand"? So, by your circular word salad, laws of humanity are antithetical to individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Which of my juvenile comrades conveniently neglect such comprehensive investigation(s)? Please name my comrades by name so I will know who to speak with? My evil empire ;-) '-) :-) hahaha, lololol? I think, thank you for the upgrade? Please be specific when describing my credentials of an evil empire agenda, how I sustain my evil / half truths and whole lies. Does my evil empire stretch to the planet you came from?

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, hahaha / lolololol WHAT?  Your Messiah complex is showing again  what a wonderful understanding you think you have of racism and the evil empire. (I shake my lowered head, laughing uncontrollably). Are you visited often by intergalactic travelers? Is that evil empire that has designated you enimy #1 and racist of this planet or somewhere far / far away? Can you please direct us to the periodical or article that designates you as such?

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, hahahaha / lololololol WHAT? ? ? OK, I'll bite, what are you? Are you properly acquainted with anyone off planet earth. I'll take you at your word, you are a socialist with a Messiah complex; that speaks in circular word salad and lies. You say you don't know anything about me personally BUT, then you claim I'm one of many juvenile delinquents  I say hmmm. What is "my" personal system that is just a plain misrepresentation?  Can you please be specific (since you don't know me), what do I need to do to stop being juvenile delinquents (-; does that mean I'm a plural on the planet you are from ;-), grow up and address reality (who's reality) as adults? 

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, WHAT? ? ? Wrong again. What law are you saying I'm abiding? How do you define sovereign at nature's law? You've stated you say nothing that you can't prove. Please prove with facts, evidence and intent how I'm an imperialist. Please identify and exhaustively define the scale of good and evil that would, beyond a reasonable doubt, show the empire I'm coming up with. Sillik, by your single statements here, you demonstrate you are a lying mentally ill child.

Mike, Norwalk

Nature's law restrains nothing, it only defines. Only in man's thought, argument or reasoning can a restraint be associated to that which is called law. By example; a man may reason that it is a restraint to not be able to walk from mountain top to mountain top in a straight line through the air (gravity being the restraint). In fact, the law of gravity is known and consistent, neither a restraint or incitement / advantage  it just "is". Only through a despot's ideology and tyrannical enforcements can a restraint be considered legal.

Mike, Norwalk

Not shooting the messenger, YES. Compelled compliance by government is a violation and punition against the nature of the noble specie man. Wether of not your personal beliefs or actions include imbibing in chemical spirits, it is lawfully an individual choice. The consequences of a party's actions are also personal, possibly entering the domain of justice.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.