Can you please check your posts before sending correction after correction.  No one else here takes such liberties spamming this blog.  You are neither technically skilled nor literally skilled, nor skilled in political science nor on any science.  Quantity and repetition do not make quality content.  Therefore, you have no rivals (not rivels). 

Sorry, but you got an indoctrination not education, and you want us ALL to have gotten the same programming.  What do you produce for society?  What value do your services bring?

You still won't simply answer the simple questions posted above.  This is tiresome.

For such an 'educated' man, you do not write well.  'Myself' is not a type of individual (unless you are a narcissist).  If there are only 2 types of individuals, and one is of those that wish to control me, then the other type does not wish to control me.  Or there may in fact be more than two types of individuals in the world.  Or perhaps there is more than one way to categorize myself and others — maybe LOTS.  In fact we may ALL be different in some ways.  That is the very essence of being an individual.  So there are many, MANY types of individuals.

It's like: "There are two kinds of people — me and everybody else.  I am in a class by myself."

Victims of rape, theft, slavery and murder disagree.

Very apropos for today, as with the thinnest majority and a questionable executive, bills bankrupting the nation are passed, pushing the nation further to authoritarianism.  The Church of Climate and the WEF are rolling out the Great Reset — this is all part of the plan.  Now that Trump is out of the way and the Biden puppet installed, the globalist fascist plans are in full swing.

Everything happening in the world — EVERYTHING — was executed from the central bankers plan.  None of this is an accident.  This is war.

The quote is about being rendered defenseless in the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death.  Firearms aren't even mentioned.  The quote is about being responsible for defending one's life and liberty.  The argument is that we the people are born with the right to defend ourselves — in fact it is not just a right but a duty otherwise it's servitude and death.

I know, right?

Yes, the word 'democracy' has supplanted the word 'democratic-republic' which was how Thomas Jefferson described the form of government.  I agree with Mike, but if we fix the quote by using "democratic-republic' I'd give it 5 stars.

The monopoly of the media IS the oppression of a free press. The reach of the press in the 1700's was miniscule compared to radio and TV.  The power of the press is enormous — it shapes the very minds and hearts of the people, that's why the biggest and most far-reaching media outlets have been bought up by the monopolists to preserve and increase their power.

Another reason that the search for truth is necessary, because lies are enshrined everywhere as gospel and broadcasted daily.

Fred seems to share some Conservative values and is having trouble categorizing them into socialist boxes. What to do with the biggest socialist group of all LGBTQI+ — call them fascists?  I do not disagree.  But Fred's definition of socialism is just another flavor of totalitarian governance 'for our own good.' The Catholic Church of old was the same.

I agree with a good portion of Fred's ideals and goals for humanity, but completely disagree with the HOW they are to be achieved.

The battle against evil is primarily with oneself, within one's own heart, to not become like the evil doers while in defense of goodness, truth and love.  That means having a thinking mind and a compassionate heart.  Watching my fellows go down a road to perdition is heart wrenching.  I must find a way to reach them without coercion and force.

Fred, in your world, how are your ideals to be achieved?  How to get the people to go along?  Do they have a choice?  Will you be a leader of some sort?  What place does Freedom have in your world? 

Please answer the simple questions, not another distraction on how uneducated I am (a politician's trick to not answer a straight question.)  These are not gotcha's.  If you are going to impose your vision on the rest of us, we will have to know the rules.

"No one in the world, other than myself, sincerely supports equality."  Who is biased and mentally ill?  Talk about lunacy (narcissism, arrogance, ignorance, delusions of grandeur).

Holy crap!  THAT is the (public) education you got from University of Northern Iowa?  The American middle class are Nazis?  What a load of commie BS.  Talk about mental illness...

"Deviances will be treated humanely" WOW!  Straight up fascism!

You know nothing of my education, Fred.  And you have not been claiming to be an average adult, and an average adult is not like you, as you admit to have superior morality and education 'than' (not then) the rest of us.  This sounds more like arrogance than educated...

There's a big difference between making accusations and making an argument.  Please debate the arguments, not the man.

One of my favorites!

Social engineering is definitely fascistic.  And it is definitely socialist/statist.  Your definition of the socialist has a Hitler-esque ring to it — the super man.  The Nazis rounded up homosexuals, too.  Hitler was a vegetarian, didn't smoke or drink, and would agree with your definition of socialism, Fred. Delusions of grandeur.

I think I'm beginning to see the mental splinter in Fred's mind.  His description of socialism more resembles the Universalist Church, only without the Christian concept of God and the Creator.  The basic principles are there, only their application is guided by some who claim to be unbiased and educated while the common folk need to be led.  This is the collectivist aspect.  This is not freedom.

While a person should do good, compelling them to do what others say is good is ripe for corruption.  The rulers benefit tremendously when the people are convinced that they must obey the dictates of the do-gooders rather than decide for themselves what cause to donate time and money to.  

All that mankind needs to do to 'save' ourselves is to take responsibility and remember who we really are.

Hmm, they were all killed by their wives, but rather should have been put on trial and executed via tribunal instead?  Wow that's a new take.

That's what Liberty is all about — living life to the fullest without hindrance from others imposing their rules on society, laying claim to what is not theirs, pushing the answers to 'why am I here?'   I can see that Fred's version of socialism is great for him, it's just that the rest of us would like to live our own lives.

Bizarre.  They deserved to be put on trial?  Sheesh.

Love it!  Right on the button.

What a difference 70 years has made at Yale ...

My goodness, how far Massachusetts has fallen...

"Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me."

Are children still taught that any more?  How about college kids?

Trusting and respecting the Laws of Nature is republicanism.  Democracy is essentially mob rule.  Socialism is a theocracy.  Socialism cannot be implemented without force — i.e. violence.  Whatever happened to 'live and let live?'