The rules for taxation can be lawfully applied to corporations via the Uniform Commercial Code.  The only lawful taxes authorized by the US Constitution are excise taxes, e.g. tariffs, and up until 1913 that was the primary source of revenue for the government.  The US was thoroughly rich before then, with gold and silver used as currency — every dollar in circulation was backed with a hard asset.  Today every dollar is backed by debt-bearing commercial paper which was never to be used as currency but a tool for promoting commercial transactions — the risk was borne by the companies that traded in these IOUs and if the debt was not repaid, there were consequences that were litigated in commercial courts.

Once commercial paper became the trading medium for all, we all became commercial entities trading in commercial paper, thus subject to the reams and reams of rules in the Uniform Commercial Code.  The distinction between corporation and person became blurred such that today corporations are treated as people and people are treated as corporations.

We need to return to a monetary system where cash and credit are distinctly different.  The IRS treats us all as commercial entities and tags our 'income' with various excise tax codes in order to qualify the tax as constitutional.  But labor was never to be taxed!  That is slavery.  It behooves every citizen to learn the truth about the corruption of the monetary system — but don't expect any of this to be taught in public education (and you know why).  The Wafflers of this world cannot face the fact that they have been in collusion with this system because their 'income' would have never been possible without it.  So it is 'fair' to them.

No, Dick, what Marx said is not irrelevant.  Marx's ideology has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of millions of people and the enslavement of the rest.

No, Mr. "A".  The actions advocated by Marx in the Communist Manifesto are a 'how to' list for enslaving a populace to be ruled by an elite.  Is that good or bad?  For the slaves, bad, for the enslavers, good.  Whose side are you on anyway?

Yes, it was not only propaganda but also policy.  Nothing has been inverted — this is the policy of a statist form of government, whether from the left or the right. 

The final line says it all: "The Common Good Before the Individual Good"  Who determines that?  How can it be enforced?  Is this what the American Founders fought for?  Is this what the Constitution empowers government to do?

Face it, democrats, progressives and socialists, this is your creed, no matter how you try to rationalize it, and the only way to enforce such an ideal is to corrupt classical liberal republican governance into its polar opposite.  This utopian dream is but a nightmare.  Ignorant hypocrites all!

True, without a 'right' view of 'good' and 'bad' this quote supports any action whether right or not.  Take the progressive activism constantly at work because silence is considered submission.  That being said, there is too much complacency IMO among those that could rightfully counter the assaults of 'progressive' liberals (i.e. Marxists).

No, I don't think so.  When given no other choice but to be ruled by communists or fascists, we must concede that we have lost our 'right' to dictate our own lives.  Pure democracy is but mob rule, where the individual has little choice to go with the mob or else be trampled.

Interesting.  I suppose it means that if we do not care to recognize a line between 'right and wrong', we will inevitably cross it.

Unfortunately, Mary, the people didn't listen or defend their freedom.  Madison's warnings have all but come true, and the common people have been dumbed down to thinking the exact opposite of the principles enshrined by Madison, the primary author of the US Constitution.  Is it too late to return to sanity and lawful power?

I'm all for rising!  Let us live up to our God-given nature, as Mike would say, 'noble sovereigns,' masters of our own fate, writers of our own stories, realizing who we really are, not subject to the whims of those that wish to yoke us for their own gain either financial or egotistical.

LOL Fred, may I counter your defense that you "have never received any of the most remote interest by any female" because of your self-righteous, argumentative and condescending attitude, sense of superiority, deep need for admiration, passive-aggressive and judgmental nature, not to mention obnoxiousness.  This makes you positively repellent.  Marilyn Monroe?!  In your fevered dreams!  You are so delusional.  Wake up, man, this is textbook narcissism...

Heck, our elected officials. as imperfect as they are, sure do seem to have more respect than you do, Fred.  You would have us all live in your own private Idaho whether we want to or not.

Fred, no other species requires a central 'scrutinizer' to plan for its existence — neither does humankind.  We can trace all social ills to such arrogance.  Please, the world is not in need of your saving it — you can't do it, there is no way to pay for it even if you enslaved every soul on Earth, but you can kill off billions in the process which is the not-so secret aim of the geo-fascists that count you among their useful idiots who will happily make life unlivable for those that would rather be free to guide their own lives as they see fit than be enslaved by the likes of you 'for their own good.'  Pitiful.

I agree.  I would start with dumping the bias that 'climate change' is an existential danger that humankind must do something to resolve.  It's just another scheme to monetize scarcity in the environment to profit from it.  Regulate energy production into scarcity, and the speculators get rich from energy prices.  Regulate water into scarcity, and droughts and floods will make speculators rich.  Regulate farming and food production into scarcity and become wealthy from starvation. 

Nature is abundant, and can provide for all.  But when the rulers regulate who can produce — even to collect rain water or grow your own food — an aristocracy forms out of the poverty intentionally planned.  This is the oldest game on the planet.  Independence and self-sufficiency are the enemy, and every effort is made to keep the people dumb and dependent upon a ruling class that taxes them not to provide for the common people but to keep them from ever breaking free from the perpetual debt foisted upon them.

So, all we need is a wise and benevolent king. Got it.

I continue to grow in knowledge and experience through these dialogues, Fred.  So far, your ramblings aren't substantive enough to learn anything from you other than provide an example of a disordered and confused mind. 

My opinions of you are based on your own words — there is no shortage of them, and you make one thing very clear: you believe you are the smartest, most mature, most sane person on the planet, and you have no equal, and that nearly always people think you are in need of psychiatric help. 

Friendships? I doubt you have any.  Mike and I are probably the only people you engage with.  But please do consider me a friend.

As far as your writing goes, it is needlessly verbose using complex words incorrectly, grammatically incorrect, and almost exclusively relying on well-known logical fallacies as support for your truly unoriginal ideas which have a history of failure so profound, it would take a completely ignorant and poorly educated person to hold fast to them as gospel.

Please know that I am not making fun of you.  I really am trying to help you and others like you that may stumble upon these dialogues.  We have been lied to and suffer for it, but thankfully the Truth makes us free!  I am here because I like the quotes on this site about Liberty and have been posting here for over 20 years (with Mike and others). 

True liberty requires an awakening, and this forum has been a lot of fun to connect with like-minded and opposition alike.  I've always been curious as to why people so against liberty like to come here and promote servitude — perhaps because it is 'fun' to mock those of us that proscribe to personal responsibility rather than socialist dependency.  No matter, it has only strengthened my resolve and faith that mankind will one day break the chains that bind them and find true Liberty. ;-)

Yes, hence Hitler's term for his empire was the "Fatherland."  You would have fit in well, except that I suppose you would have been jealous of Hitler and believed you could do it better.

"Did ...you yourself offer contributions of these very precious roles?"  Yes, I believe so, I've been happily married for over 30 years blessed with a wonderful wife and children.  How about you?  Personally, I can't imagine anyone being able to live with as narcissistic a personality as yours, but there's no accounting for other people's tastes...

OK, perfect example: you say "eliminate the drug and sex trades."  Despite reams of government laws, centuries of cracking down on such practices, why have these evils not been eradicated? Has banning opium ever stopped the opium trade?  Has making prostitution ever stopped prostitution, even with the threat of stoning?  Why are more children trafficked for sex now than ever in history?  You cannot cure these ills through legislation, and for the same reason, socialism in all its terrible forms cannot succeed by compulsion without total and complete servitude — and even that won't stop people 'breaking' the law no matter how noble.

It is unfortunate that you have not found any guiding principles to peace in the Bible.  The 'Truth' is more than a superstitious belief in a divine being, it is a 'spiritual' understanding of the laws of nature and our individual responsibility to act in accord with them.  The proof is in the pudding, and to those of us who are willing to put away our sacred cows in search for true understanding, the Truth has become self-evident, because it is not a philosophy or a socially engineered process but what is.  And you cannot come to this understanding without the freedom to pursue it and to say NO to the lies and those that oppress the truth.  

Your utopian ideals are based on a false premise, and nothing can ever come from them to fill a 'hole' that in fact does not exist.

Fred, the means to such an end (and history has proven 'by any means necessary') would be bloody and disastrous.  Shame on you for being willing to pay such a price for your utopian wet dreams which would NEVER come to fruition, only result in the death and destruction of those who would rather die than live in your socialist nightmare.  Your hubris is astounding.

"I hold no designs on any great office or title or possess any." This is not an accident — you are in fact NOT more effective than presidents, monarchs, or emperors, you are living in a narcissistic dream world.  You are ALONE, have no power, and if your ideas were followed, that would herald the end of the world.  Heed the council of the last known remnants of your friends: snap out of it!  The path you are on leads into the abyss.

"We need a national housing project with everyone living in the same basic sheltering guidelines. No individual is afforded or according anymore valued living quarters than anyone else. " NO, NO, a thousand times, NO!  See the former USSR where this was put into practice — it is the very definition of tyranny and servitude!  It is the gospel of envy and the curse of ignorance.

So what?  You brought up sex and drugs into the debate.  It has nothing to do with "demonizing those who produce, subsidizing those who refuse to produce, and canonizing those who complain."  You are the biggest complainer I have ever heard, yet won't/can't address a simple response to your complaint.  By just saying "well, I'm unconventional, not like you guys" that doesn't mean you are right (again, another logical fallacy).

Classical liberalism is THE defender of the unconventional, not the Marxist claptrap you continually spout.  Only Liberty lets the unconventional be — that is unless the unconventional insists that the rest adopt his/her conventions — the compulsion to oppress others with an ideology is in fact quite conventional among monarchs, dictators, social engineers, communists, 'progressive' liberals and every other form of would-be rulers 'for our own good.'

Lord knows I have been trying with you, Fred, but horses can be led to water, you just can't make them drink.

I believe you can click on the link to the article from which this quote originated... As expected it was in reference to printing up more money (i.e. borrowing at interest) to shore up Social Security.

Hmm, if only there was a way to use some form of token in exchange for labor and property instead of borrowing for our daily necessities... I've got it, a credit card with no limit!  LOL, Fred, credit is debt!

Actually there is a system, and is mandated by law in America.  It's called gold and silver which can't be printed up out of nothing.  I'll repeat myself for the umpteenth time, every so-called 'dollar' in circulation has been borrowed — that is how 'money' today is minted, it is 'borrowed' into circulation, it is called 'monetizing debt' which quite simply is using interest-bearing IOUs as money (like the money created by a credit card).

The national 'debt' is the largest chunk of the money in circulation, the rest is created by private banks (and even the Federal Reserve is a private bank consortium) — mortgage debt, credit card debt, corporate debt, car loans, and student loans.  That's 99% of the money supply right now, plus all the derivatives and banking tricks that treats new debt as a deposit for backing even newer debt, on and on.  All that debt IS THE MONEY SUPPLY, there is no 'money' that is not a debt!  AND the total debt owed far exceeds all the money in circulation — the government is even borrowing to pay interest on debt. 

This Ponzi scheme has bankrupted the world!  You can't use the system to fix the system — this is the system, and it is working as designed, to indenture the entire world to the cartel of central banksters.

Did you know that only countries in debt to their central banks could be members of the UN?  The UN is the parliament of the central bankers.  Remember when Switzerland was 'neutral'?  That was because it continued to use a hard currency, not a fiat currency.  How about the Arab nations?  Until a few years ago, they still used the gold dinar as their currency, but one by one as they were conquered by the 'West' they adopted fiat currencies and their populations thrown into poverty.

One gold coin can facilitate an infinite number of transactions, it does not lose its intrinsic value; however, a Federal Reserve Note is an interest-bearing debt instrument, known as commercial paper, and it is like using a leaky vase to exchange water, it eventually becomes nearly worthless.  The US 'dollar' buys what a nickel could buy less than a hundred years ago.  A $50,000 house in 1960 now costs a million dollars!  An ad man in NYC made 15$ a week — now $3000 a week doing the same thing.

The solution is not an interest-free no-limit credit card or a guaranteed income from the government (which they will only have to borrow to provide).  We must wholly and completely divest ourselves from debt as money!  We must return to making a distinction between cash and credit — we must be given the option to accept cash or credit, not be forced to convert our labors and property into debt money. 

Pay me in gold or silver (or any other non-perishable good/capital).  Let stores accept gold and silver again in exchange for goods and services.  Leave credit/debt to the Wall Street speculators, do not mix paper and substance in the free market treating them equally.

Unfortunately, those holding the debt of the world are NOT going to let us out of our promises to pay.  It is the biggest and most powerful mafia in the world, and they declare war on any nation that tries to rid itself of their grasp.  We are living on borrowed time, and all that our illustrious leaders can do is kick the can down the road, they will be dead before the con comes to an end.  The people must learn the Truth or enslave each other, passing the hot potato and playing musical chairs at the same time.

Remember, the game of Monopoly has only one winner and then all the pieces go back into the box.