Mike Norwalk: Another thing, your mental condition gets you in trouble and you blame completely innocent individuals like myself.
This needs to stop. We need mental health progress now and I'm ready to render my services in a broader international manner.

Continued: Mike Norwalk: We need a national distribution center to supply everyone the necessary goods and services required for a healthy and healthy life. The resources of our arrangement should be redistributed in a equitable and prosperous manner to serve the needs of everyone.  We need a mental health plan that brings to the realization that you Mike Norwalk live in a world of make believe and then transfers you to the point of reality. On and on.

Mike Norwalk: I'm not advocating censorship.
I believe you are subduing freedom of speech by your inability to reason. Your "freedom" to not listen is subduing any important content that would enable progressive measures to proceed. You subdue freedom of speech in your inability to change by just relaying to old messages of the past that meant nothing in past and still mean nothing.  You are the censorship advocate by saying nothing of real content.  Freedom, liberty are swell words.  We need specific moral changes.  We need to respect life, all developmental life by ending the abortion procedure, stop sexism by ending homosexuality. We need to put a end to the automobile. We need a national housing project to supply homes to everyone. We need to a national distribution center to supply everyone the necessary goods and services to 

Not sure,  at this point, what point Mr Congreve is making here, but the mentally ill will try to overwhelm and confuse the a circumstances to reach their objective, that being superiority.  And the rare truism does emerge. The mentally healthy just want to safely reach their intended destination safely, health and happiness.

Mike Norwalk l'm no advocating censorship. 

The sad state of our elections, in the whole process we have only elected individuals with a partial or extraneous representative effectiveness.  Meaning, we've never had anyone with a true vision to inspire an entire nation to rise a new level of developmental excellence.  We need the type of individual that would take us to a higher level of the life cycle.

The fellow appears to be glorifying trickery and scammers. His educational credentials are quite questionable, calling scammers talented is the examination qualities and abilities of a child.

I would like to state for the record that I had no knowledge of any plans to assassinate any of our presidents, presidential candidates, civil rights representatives, or anyone else for that matter. 

It is not logically necessary to compete with Russia and China. The necessity is the necessary diplomatic acumen to design a cooperative attitude to create social climate to promote a planetary environment sustainable for life.

Why does Mr. Sowell have this disposition? Why can't individuals disagree with him?
I wish he wasn't so pathetic and dangerous.

Self accountability and self examination, if it is internalized, is a step in the right direction.

This does appear to correlate with the objective perspective that the typical conventional individual doesn't seem to believe their own perception or coordinated descriptions presented to them.  

The second amendment was enacted to intimidate anyone's use of the first amendment.

The firearm is the master of the vicious and the corrupt. They know of no other real authority, save for God on Sundays, but not every Sunday. The firearm is their master every Goddamn day.

It is the observation that our cause is the cause of humankind, but this is not the common occurrence, because the vast, vast, vast majority are looking through the eyes of the mentally deranged.

Why would someone subdue or even want to subdue the freedom of speech and why is Benjamin Franklin aware of this overthrowing liberty? Also, and why am I the only one who would ask this question? Is there any of you who would not want to subdue the freedom of speech? Well, is there? Is not murdering our presidents and civil rights personnel subduing the freedom of speech?

Sorry Mr Archer: You're the indoctrinated.  Sex, drugs, and the military to protect this decadent style.  I want nothing to do with it. I want to live as a human being. I want to live with intelligent beings not a bunch of idiot bums making up diseases that don't even directly exist like Coronavirus. You creatures go around making up absurd symptoms of absurd illnesses for progressive individuals, as my self, who are trying to create an atmosphere that supports life.

Mr Archer: You're argument makes as much sense as trying to present firearms to an unwanted fetus. My understanding is that every female at this point supports the demise of any unwanted fetus. In fact this idea of  "pro-choice" simply does not exist because if you are not in a agreement with abortion you meet much political oppressive opposition, which indeed I do. There's only pro death or pro life. There's only pro death or me

John Quincy Adams depicted in that interesting movie called  something like La Amistad. A gentleman in that movie asked "is there anything more pathetic then a former president?"

Firearms are the unmistakable identifying implementation of the oppressive invader and plunderer. Ideas of love, kindness, equality are the implementation of the individuals interested in civilized order.

You should never mistake a conventional arrangement insane asylum for government. Government is the force of reason and eloquence.  As far as that last sentence, I wish President Washington wouldn't been so hard on himself.

Mr Archer: About thirty one years ago I began opening up my mind. I was changing and for fun, probably,  a several individuals told me I sounded like a Socialist. Being a red blooded American I was on the verge of apologizing. At some time later combing the University of Northern Iowa library I found a passage by a fellow named Albert Einstein. It went along the lines that we should work first for passivism, a then later socialism. I was forever changed, probably coming out of that library yelling to everyone I'm a Socialist. 

Knowing the full extent and scope of an issue will enable the individual the full exercise of their freedom to express. If you know what you're talking about, you aren't going to be stopped by anything.

We must develop an education system where individuals have ideas to fuel the democratic system. We simply have no fuel.

Correction #2: I'll try this one more time.
You're right Mr Archer. I leave a lot to be desired to be a technically skilled writer, nevertheless as far as the scope of the depth and quality of  content of my literary contributions, I simply have no rivels.