Mr Archer I don't much about this conservative idea. There is no inertia. You move backwards or forward. For example heterosexuality is knew notion. If you comb the ancient historical accounts of Greece and Rome you tend to ask yourself, weren't their any heterosexuals? True their must have been some mixing of the genders because we're all here, all 8 billion of us.   The sad fact is that our race historically has just been a bunch homosexuals associating together to make more homosexuals, apparently holding their noses. Recently I foolishly approached a couple of girls who were "associating." I felt fortunate I got away with my health intact. Girls typically so it seems, carry dangerous devices. I  was accused of predation, but really what happening was these girls were preying on each other. 

Mr Archer: The ideals will be achieved by the ideas. Who ever has the ideas will be the leader.  Despite all the the political process, the leader is going to be the individual with the inspirational motivating directions. Politics, sticks around because, like sports and Hollywood, all the kids want to see a show.   Its not the idea of choice that matters, its reaching the stage of the sound healthy course and following that course that matters.  Life is not that complicated. The mission for the mentally healthy is to raise the consciousness of the populous.  I would say you have no choice between death and life. Life's the winner.

Correction: You're right Mr Archer. I leave a lot to be desired to be a technically skilled writer, nevertheless, as far as the scope of depth and quality content, I humble assert I have no rivels.

Mr Archer Webb and Sherman: Schools and American Society 

Mr Archer: you're right about one thing, I would have say I leave a lot to be desired as a technically skilled writer. I don't believe I'm a very technically skilled writer. Nonetheless, as far as the depth and quality of original literary content I would humbly have say I have no rivels.

Mr Archer: one should not trust your biased history to much, however, my impression was Mr Hitler did not have the best of intent. I have do have the best of intentions. I think you will find a rare similarity with me and Mr Hilter. You will find, my guess is, countless similarities with Mr Hilter and Mr Roosevelt, not to forget Mr Churchill among these foolish players.

Mr Archer come on, an intelligent person understands they are never defenseless.

Mr Archer: l know of two types of individuals, myself and those who wish to control me.

The individual carrying the firearm is just saying they have no other way to express themselves and their accompanying case don't amount to hill of beans. It me, me, me, and the hell with you, you, you. The peaceful individual has everyone's best interest as their intent.

Mr Archer: All supporters of firearms are hate mongering, trouble making, hunter, predator racists, sexist, degenerates looking for the "ultimate prey" victim.  Individuals with no wits are always defenseless.

Mr Archer: The biased mentally ill run the world.
Lunacy is not on the "fringes." It's the very heart of your conventional arrangement. I am the soul representative of mental health because I simply  have  a sincerely different opinion.  No one in the world, other than myself,  sincerely supports equality.  Your strange idea that we can all be equal in the perpetration of crime is pure lunacy. We can only share responsibility, equally.

Mr Archer: A characteristic of your mental condition is you make up conditions as you go, 
" I made it up as I went along." Being "Hilter-esuque" as you are, you really know nothing about the fellow. And none of conventional fellowship buddies would dare never to question anything your say.  The advantage of mentally sick in mentally sick world.

Mr Archer: You maybe interested to know, amazingly, that I was informed at the University of Northern Iowa where I went to most of my college that Nazism is synonymous with middle class America. Your lack of self awareness is the mental illness we need to address. Proof, also, you are also a projectionness.

Mr Archer: I desire to oppress no one. Homosexuality, religion, and all the other deviances will be treated humanely in accordance with the refined mental health procedures to bring about personal esteem and social respectfulness and the accompanying responsible behavior.

Mr Archer: I claim to be no superman, just the average adult. The only superiority I claim is a superior morality by being better educated then you but clearly the Educator wishes to pass on the valuable information. No one in the right mind, and I'm in my right mind, wants to be the only one who can love.

In the final analysis, I'm sure we will all say, all for the best.

Mike Norwalk: The fascist wants an advantage, she's a politician.  The Socialist wants fair and equal distribution, he is a social engineering scientist. The fascist is a loser looking for losers. The Socialist has a winning attitude and knows there is goodness and strength in every individual.  The fascist is always looking for a weakness of some kind in his fellows. The Socialist is always trying to access that strength that is available in every situation.

Mike Norwalk Fascism is a selfish, self centered approach. This mentality is unproductive. Homosexuality is the same selfish, self centered unproductive attitude.
Heterogeneous individuals bring the complimentry forces to bare a positive result. The social person is unselfish, selfless individual who produces a positive result, which are the required characteristics for a positive result. I call this individual the Socialist. The heterogeneous individual and Socialist both produce positive results and correlate positively.

Hello Mike Norwalk: My personal observations are quite unbiased, more creditable than any biased study you're going to find in our conventional world Mike. Homosexuality is mental illness. It produces no positive result. Fascism is a mental illness and produces no positive result and the correlation between fascism and homosexuality is positive. Socialism is a mental healthy action based scientific critical evidence. I am not a sexual person. I prefer to be called heterogeneitous.

Mr Archer: Indeed, my very post mentioned putting the whole system on trial. We need to internalize the fact that anyone of us, among other issues, could have been in Lee Harvey Oswald's position, November 1963 if born in the era. Sirhan Sirhan knew immediately what strategy to take from Oswald's fate. I didn't speak gangster language back then, so I know what was going on, and still don't know much about it but you trying to teach me to incriminate me. You're are a bunch evil hoodlum degenerates who need to change.

Let me get this straight, politics is hate? Interesting.  Lucid, very lucid contribution by Mr Adams.

The quote here is not very lucid.  Individuals only want to discuss why they are not being benefited, not rewarded, and not having a lucrative return for themselves. This selfish self-centered position is the big problem that all the conventional individuals share and not addressing, so no one is really, other than the Socialist, mentioning wants wrong with America. Mr Bauer is not very near to being correct on this contribution.

Fascism and Socialism are the polar opposites. The fascist is sexual deviate who wants control over others to quench their sick desires. Everything is sex and the accompanying alcohol and drugs. Socialism is controlling our desires to a positive end. You realize that sex is only to bring forth a child you are prepared for both financially and educational.  Alcohol and drugs are completely ruled out. Your follows condone deviate behavior calling yourself such items as "transgender" and impregnate two females your are doing jail time with. The advantage you want is no responsibility or anyone proposing responsibility.

Mike Norwalk: From my prospective I observe no one defending liberty other than myself. This fellow Lenin, and I don't know much about the fellow, to defend armaments in my perspective does not support a very effective position  to bring about a civilized circumstance. I believe a responsible Socialist brings with him an alternative to violence of any kind. The Soviet Union was a money making machine for the wealthy of that body to foment a fearful and confused situation to secure their continued advantages of controlling resources. My vantage point offers no opposition by Lenin to the wealthy's advantages position.  You Mike Norwalk want an advantaged position as observed by everyone on the planet, other myself, among your goals. Sorry to reply so late.

Practical contemplation, meditative examination, componental measurements actually detour crime.