Mr Archer: I desire to oppress no one. Homosexuality, religion, and all the other deviances will be treated humanely in accordance with the refined mental health procedures to bring about personal esteem and social respectfulness and the accompanying responsible behavior.

Mr Archer: I claim to be no superman, just the average adult. The only superiority I claim is a superior morality by being better educated then you but clearly the Educator wishes to pass on the valuable information. No one in the right mind, and I'm in my right mind, wants to be the only one who can love.

In the final analysis, I'm sure we will all say, all for the best.

Mike Norwalk: The fascist wants an advantage, she's a politician.  The Socialist wants fair and equal distribution, he is a social engineering scientist. The fascist is a loser looking for losers. The Socialist has a winning attitude and knows there is goodness and strength in every individual.  The fascist is always looking for a weakness of some kind in his fellows. The Socialist is always trying to access that strength that is available in every situation.

Mike Norwalk Fascism is a selfish, self centered approach. This mentality is unproductive. Homosexuality is the same selfish, self centered unproductive attitude.
Heterogeneous individuals bring the complimentry forces to bare a positive result. The social person is unselfish, selfless individual who produces a positive result, which are the required characteristics for a positive result. I call this individual the Socialist. The heterogeneous individual and Socialist both produce positive results and correlate positively.

Hello Mike Norwalk: My personal observations are quite unbiased, more creditable than any biased study you're going to find in our conventional world Mike. Homosexuality is mental illness. It produces no positive result. Fascism is a mental illness and produces no positive result and the correlation between fascism and homosexuality is positive. Socialism is a mental healthy action based scientific critical evidence. I am not a sexual person. I prefer to be called heterogeneitous.

Mr Archer: Indeed, my very post mentioned putting the whole system on trial. We need to internalize the fact that anyone of us, among other issues, could have been in Lee Harvey Oswald's position, November 1963 if born in the era. Sirhan Sirhan knew immediately what strategy to take from Oswald's fate. I didn't speak gangster language back then, so I know what was going on, and still don't know much about it but you trying to teach me to incriminate me. You're are a bunch evil hoodlum degenerates who need to change.

Let me get this straight, politics is hate? Interesting.  Lucid, very lucid contribution by Mr Adams.

The quote here is not very lucid.  Individuals only want to discuss why they are not being benefited, not rewarded, and not having a lucrative return for themselves. This selfish self-centered position is the big problem that all the conventional individuals share and not addressing, so no one is really, other than the Socialist, mentioning wants wrong with America. Mr Bauer is not very near to being correct on this contribution.

Fascism and Socialism are the polar opposites. The fascist is sexual deviate who wants control over others to quench their sick desires. Everything is sex and the accompanying alcohol and drugs. Socialism is controlling our desires to a positive end. You realize that sex is only to bring forth a child you are prepared for both financially and educational.  Alcohol and drugs are completely ruled out. Your follows condone deviate behavior calling yourself such items as "transgender" and impregnate two females your are doing jail time with. The advantage you want is no responsibility or anyone proposing responsibility.

Mike Norwalk: From my prospective I observe no one defending liberty other than myself. This fellow Lenin, and I don't know much about the fellow, to defend armaments in my perspective does not support a very effective position  to bring about a civilized circumstance. I believe a responsible Socialist brings with him an alternative to violence of any kind. The Soviet Union was a money making machine for the wealthy of that body to foment a fearful and confused situation to secure their continued advantages of controlling resources. My vantage point offers no opposition by Lenin to the wealthy's advantages position.  You Mike Norwalk want an advantaged position as observed by everyone on the planet, other myself, among your goals. Sorry to reply so late.

Practical contemplation, meditative examination, componental measurements actually detour crime. 

Mentally healthy journalism would accurately report the needed progressive information reducing greatly the propaganda manipulations.

Mental health is a great prerequisite for productive journalism.

Correction 2: I believe Gandhi's wife death proceeded his own so 
I don't know a lot  about that case unfolded. I'll keep you posted as that case slowly present's itself. 

Correction: Mr Archer: What was being billed as the "American sexual revolution" of the sixties both 18 hundreds as well as 19 hundreds was the murder of President Lincoln, MLK, President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy by their wives.

Additionally Mr Archer, I believe, because I'm operating on the facilities of reason and intuition that all the  "trigger women" of the males mentioned of this circumstances were in fact females claiming "revolution." This was in fact what was being really being billed in the nineteen-sixties as the "sexual revolution."

Mike Norwalk I have my reservations about you liking my comment because I believe you are a band member.  I'm not smiling because this action of Conora Virus is a terrorist attack on the same level as that of September 11, 2001.

Mr Archer, I know why I am here. It's to understand and to respond to the understanding. It's the response ability. It's responsibility. For the human,  liberty 
is not the catch word, the word is responsibility. Until you understand that, you will not be able to live your own life. I know why I'm here.

Yes, trial, Mr Archer, and the verdict looks like it would not have gone in any of these individual's favor.  They would have been found guilty of abusive treatment of their own children.

Mr Archer: the mentally ill do pay much attention to the mentally healthy, and Mr Archer I can say with all honesty I never really have a boring moment.  Existence is a tumultuous struggle between death and life and I'm on the life side. Everyone else seems to be putting their bets on something else, to me this breath and heartbeat is all there is, and when that's over it's all over and done.

Did this fellow predict the orchestration of Conora virus? 

Sorry Editor, I feel I should deliver an additional post, for to not be called a sexist I should mention the same primitive mentalities that assassinated Indira Gandhi was the same as Mahatma Gandhi, Dr. King, President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Mr Abraham Lincoln. She also deserved a fair and fully examined trial. Maybe I should say WE the People deserved these individual's put in front of a fair trial jury. It is time we address the troubles of the world as adults and end this mob vigilante murdering. Socialism is the vision of social abilities to create.

Mr. Mahatma Gandhi deserved a fair and fully examined  trial, and not the vigilante, vindictive, mob  "justice" that was meted out to him.  The same procedure should have been practiced for Dr. King, the Kennedys and Mr Abraham Lincoln.

I'm not name calling Mr. Archer your follows identify with these  names, specifically gangster, criminal, "O G...etc, etc, ...