Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Print this Page [1-4] of 4Posts from Gerald, PhiladelphiaGerald, Philadelphia Reply Gerald, Philadelphia 4/4/10 re: U. S. Army Training Manual No. 2000-25 quote Ooops, just read through and it looks like Mike from Norwalk beat me to the "alodial" punch. Kudos to you Mike. Reply Gerald, Philadelphia 4/4/10 re: U. S. Army Training Manual No. 2000-25 quote Furthermore, back when men-were-men, we had a WAR DEPARTMENT. WHY? 'Cause we're 'Mericans. But NOOOooo, not today. Today we have the Department OF Defence, not "at defence," not "in defence," not anything meaning actually doing something, but "of"-as in somewhere in the vacinity, ... but not quite. It used to be known as the Defence Department. At least they were willing to say that they would do something, if not attack. Oh, what's the use. Calgon-up! 1Reply Gerald, Philadelphia 4/4/10 re: U. S. Army Training Manual No. 2000-25 quote Orwell was correct. Jim you're a "prol." Another earth-shaker for you guys (if you don't already know) is the early Webster's dictionaries definition of "allodial title." This thread bears its beginning in 1928. Try a look at how things have changed since our country's birth, AND brith-right of ownership of the land on which you reside today. I know it shook my belief structure. 1Reply Gerald, Philadelphia 4/4/10 re: U. S. Army Training Manual No. 2000-25 quote This document is a fraud and a hoax. -- Jim, Olympia You're a fraud and a hoax. SaveOk2 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print