Born free to tacitly accept slavery

Americans are born free. But then, through an artful web of "legal" deciet, trickery, word games and constructive frauds, we become enslaved. The irony is that we "choose" slavery by unquestioning acceptance of government licenses, numbers and status as a "U.S. citizen."

In all humility, I may be the most appropriate person in America to write the following overview of how "Americans" have been betrayed. My career began a decade ago during the common law court movement and has survived "redemption" and the UCC. I have watched in horror as well-meaning people (many of them close personal friends of mine, who were lawfully seeking shelter from the legal storm) have fallen from self-righteous optimism to dejection, poverty, insanity, imprisonment and even death-by-suicide. It is safe to say that just about every sovereignty/freedom process or program that does not work has crossed my desk.

But, we have been learning—we are not as hopeful and naive as we were in the common law court days. Through trial and error, good men and women have been challenging the ruthless power behind the benevolent facade of the U.S. government and its satellite state governments. In most cases, that power reaches out and destroys those who dare approach, but every now and then the good guys score a point or, in our defeat, we are able to glean valuable insight.

During the weekend of June 18, 2005, a gathering of astute individuals assembled at a location in SE Oregon. The event was called by a couple of legal historians who had decided it was time to set the record straight on myths about legal process, citizenship status and lawful v. legal rights. As a participant, I can report that the gathering was marvelous in every way—good information, good people, good food and perfect weather. I can also report that, after years of "thrust-and-parry" between freedom-seeking Americans and freedom-usurping government agents, crystalline truths are surfacing.

It is important that each of us understand the mechanisms that little men behind the curtains have put in place to ensure our perpetual enslavement. But more importantly, it is critical that we all understand that freedom is a choice and with that choice comes total responsibility—including the responsibility of finding one’s own way out of the unique slave state we create for ourselves through tacit acceptance of government constructs and "benefits."

Following are, at this time, the ground rules by which we are forced to play with U.S. government in the contemporary game of life. Keep in mind at all times that the rules are made by government and, therefore, subject to change at any time and without notice. This should come to us as no surprise as the rules have always been changing in this manner.

~ by Don Harkins~
http://proliberty.com/observer/20050704.htm

What is this thing called liberty?

Is it a kind of freedom that requires the mortgage of our lives and souls?

Is it something so precious that we are willing to kill and die for fear of losing it?

If this is so, then liberty is a hard master and an awfully expensive date.

If this is "freedom", then it is a strange freedom indeed.

So .. is it freedom then?

How do we even define freedom?

To the Collectivist, freedom is freedom FROM responsibility and worry over day to day needs.. It is freedom FROM a capitalistic, competitive rat race..

However, to the Individual, freedom is freedom TO live an unencumbered life and to own property with the ability to defend that ownership.

Obviously, this thing called "freedom" is awfully subjective.

I know some who have separated themselves in the name of freedom.

This "sovereign" status is a tenuous thing, those who are practicing it live in fear.

They may be absolutely, legally, constitutionally, morally and ethically correct but, they must stake their very lives on this in a society that does not recognize the foundation they stand on.

Some have paid the ultimate price in armed raids and others are rotting in jail.

Is this really freedom?

So what's the point then?

Do we give up and jump into the boxcars?

I don't think so.

However, it is time to reassess just exactly what the GOAL is here, and to define it very clearly.

What IS freedom, how is it defined, and by whom?

True freedom is spiritual.

We will always face limitations on our physical freedom, the very nature of even our original republican government recognizes and requires it.

There is no absolute freedom, only a point somewhere on a continuum.

What is the difference between a bit to the right or a bit to the left?

Again, your answer will be entirely relative.

It HAS to be!

Spiritual freedom is beyond that.

A spiritually free individual is truly free to fight and die for principles, and is also free to prosper, (spiritually), even under tyranny.

The ultimate physical penalties, torture and death, are no threat to one who knows spiritual freedom.

May we know that freedom, and rejoice in it.

May it be our motivation, our goal and our reward..

The term "State" means a "Republic" with a government. The term Republic means the "Land" and the "Nation" of that land; hence, the term "State" is generally in reference to a government of any specific American Republic. The founding fathers used this premise to create a government of the people--a Republic. The Union is actually a federation of the several American Republics (states). The "State" for the federation (Union) is the federal government. In the premise of the original constitutional system, the federal state was not to house American peoples at large. The Fourteenth Amendment creates citizens that are beholden to the "United States" over their own republic or country. The term "Democracy" is just a buzz-word used for the current totalitarian (socialist) system of government. The terminology game of the cabalists is yet another piece of the puzzle.

In due course, this is where the two set of rules are set forth. The Rulers (big fish), who are part of the de facto system, know this and enjoy their natural rights under the protection of the original Constitution. The ruled (little fish) are under the control of the insurgent governmental system (socialists) and do not enjoy their natural rights. Any rights they do have under the so-called (or referred to as) "constitution," are ones they receive as a privilege from the federal government. In other words: The Bill of Rights is being handed out as The Rulers see fit; such rights of which did not apply to the people in the several states to begin with. They were covered by their state constitutions.

Moreover, the way the Fourteenth Amendment is instituted, even though you believe you own your land, your land (property) can be taken from you at any time without just compensation. Unperceived by all Americans is the chilling fact they are unknowingly involved in Criminal Activity (by design) via said amendment. Once you start to read case law, you will learn to interpret the United States Code and begin to understand international law, you will understand that there are fundamentally two systems of law in operation.

After the Civil War- correctly, the War between the States- a New Federal Government was installed by the Fourteenth Amendment-it also installed new state governments. The Fourteenth Amendment created a new political system which was fundamentally adverse to the original Constitutional system and the law of nations. This was the main turning point to the Socialist State. The Fourteenth Amendment is one of the so-called Reconstruction Amendments, which are numbered the 13th, 14th and 15th. The Fourteenth Amendment is somewhat a constitution in itself; actually the Fourteenth Amendment and the organic Constitution work concurrently to make a Government de facto. Every amendment of the Constitution which comes after the Fourteenth is representative of the new governmental system installed by insurgency. . . this fact exists as: the Fourteenth Amendment was not lawfully ratified. It was strangely just "instituted" after the so-called Civil war.

The Civil War is where the contract with the people was broken. The Fourteenth Amendment laid the groundwork for the Socialist System. The constitutional government[s], as set forth by the founding fathers, are not currently in place. . . and have not been since the -called Civil War. You must understand that you have been living a lie.

Accordingly, all participants in this governmental system, both state and federal, are referred to as "Insurgents" as a matter of law. This de facto (as compared to de jure) System of government is what the insurgents, and others, refer to as a "Democracy." The Fourteenth Amendment was the instituting factor which enabled the implementation of the dictatorial "Socialist State" or "Totalitarian System." Pursuant to what we refer to as a bastard governmental system, Article IV, section 4 of the organic Constitution guarantees each state or country in the Union a government in the form of a Republic--NOT a so-called Democracy.

Democracy is indispensable to Socialism..

~ V. I. Lenin ~

Socialism leads to Communism..

~ Karl Marx ~

Nothing more than the elite protecting their property while maximizing profit..

Ignorance is not bliss

It's Slavery!!

"If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from US Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War. Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are enormous."

David M. Dodge, Researcher
Date 08/01/91
"TITLES OF NOBILITY" AND "HONOUR"

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.
By chance, they discovered the library's oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a Thirteenth Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. Moreover, after studying the Amendment's language and historical context, they realized that the principal intent of this "missing" Thirteenth Amendment was to prohibit Attorneys of the Bar Associations from serving in government as an "elite" class, i.e., lawyers holding membership in a society with a charter that creates special privileges for the them. The Founders experience was that such men always have divided loyalties and conflict of interest.