'Family Choice' is not so much anti-social but it is 'anti public'...particularly for those who get on to the job of political governance. They need to have got so 'objective' as to be able to include their family and friends in the 'public' arena - which is indeed the only right objective-- Impersonal but yet Sensitive.

"Private Rights' herein obviously means 'Individual Fundamental Rights'.-- as Right to Life-Honour and Property. ... This - SirWilliam Blackstone's reminder needs to be more and more publicized to wider humanity.

Very True -- And they are the audacious and shameless selfish humans. Saving grace is that they are in minority vis a vis the human average.

That is some 'disillusionment' !!

Very impotant Note !

I would like to qualify the above Statement with a 'By and large' either at the beginning or at the end.

This indeed serves as a motto for all institutions like family - the school or the Church/Temple. The crux of the matter is that all 'individuals in common shall be 'the cause and concern' of all human institutions and not just some of few or One and neither are they 'for themselves' in any way.

A much needed clarity stated - as we keep experiencing the untoward incidences of the legislature discounting the moral count for its 'political expediencies and the courts for their legalities

An 'imperceptible encrachment' can never be well meaning nor the 'doer' whatever be the context.

Excellent... The intrinsic 'oneness of Society and its individuals' is here stated in terms of its various value-quotients - very well by Ronald Regan.

Since the past three decades the world over 'disabiliy' of sorts has got the politically priveleged 'positive discrimination' human normalcy and human merit still further became the 'ignored' or 'avenged lot as it were..