“Since the State necessarily lives by the compulsory confiscation of private capital, and since its expansion necessarily involves ever-greater incursions on private individuals and private enterprise, we must assert that the state is profoundly and inherently anti-capitalist.”

Sillik, a couple of questions for you. Why do you think good evil and evil good? Why do you so hate prosperity and freedom?

Prosperity: the condition of prospering; success or wealth (Collins Legal Dictionary) Where in that or any definition of prosperity does the meaning extend to a mandatory existence of theocratical socialism? - It DOESN’T! By having to redefine prosperity means you DON’T love prosperity but rather, loath it.

Sillik, you think socialism is good - therefore, you think the mentally ill evil - that being the evil that is socialism is good. Your redesign of words and concepts; such as, it is either each and every / any and all or death is non-sensical / brainless dribble. Your dream of no homeless can only exist in an anti-socialism domain. FYI, looking around and seeing the institutionalized socialism, deprivation, corrupt police and judicial (all government), compelled compliance, victimless crime, government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, etc.) is a violation of my dream.

Sillik, individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law derive from and, are to the single and distinct sentient being. There is NO we (social) without a me (unique person). Compelled compliance of the we (socialism) is usurpation and slavery for the one. If one is self-governing, resulting in prosperity, such does not deter or take away from another's desire to be governed, a slave (socialism) and lazy.

Mike,, Norwalk, we have the anti-social psychotic domain at this very instance, due to you and your like minded cohorts efforts. I am not exactly redesign the words but giving them legitimacy for the first time.