The "right" is: to keep and bear arms PERIOD No written ideology of carnal man can lawfully usurp or limit that right.

🤪 Robert, are you suggesting everyone should bear semi-auto pitch forks?

Sillik, 🤪 WHAT ? ? ? 🤪 I say hmmm — what proper necessities for life are depravities? Your religious word salad is nonsensical from beginning through fruition.

Ray, Mussolini was an avowed socialist. He first called his version of administration corporatism. Mussolini then coined the phrase "fascist" (a bundle of sticks). Hitler and other's liked the branding. Communists and fascists hate each other's forms of administration(s) thus fight each other as much or more than anyone else. As with today's socialists, the communists and the fascist say the other guy just hasn't got it right yet. 🤪

Waffler, being the liberal left wing communist that you are, employed to enforce the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto, your lies are erroneously and fallaciously based on theocratic propaganda.

Socialism is: any of various economic, religious and political theories, philosophies or movements outside nature’s law advocating collective or governmental / religious ownership and administration of property (real / chattel / sensorial beings, etc.) along with the means of production and distribution of goods.

Your right / left paradigm is realized by fascism being the right of socialism (socialism administered through corporations); and, communism being socialism's left (socialism administered through its own statist name). Of course all socialists deny freedom / liberty, inalienable rights and individual sovereignty at nature's law.

I like it a lot; — way more accuracy there than not. Sufficiently similar in subject matter to bring to mind Matthew 7:5; "Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye."

I would add, the quote's overall concept is very good and correct; normally worthy of 5 stars.

Sillik, your religion's word salad blather is antithetical to all history, fact, law, truth and reality..

“all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” (Declaration of Independence) Also, “A well regulated Militia ({regulated here means; the many implements of war}; and, {Militia means: Individual warrior under combatant service}) being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (2nd Amendment)

Socialism (in its many forms = communism, fascism, group think progressivism, etc.) is an enslaving religion of ignorance and usurpation, - while promoting corruption. By example “⋯ Socialism is a religion.” (Joseph Goebbels); and, as socialistic Amerika parishioners reject individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and freedom / liberty at nature’s law (with a knowledge and application thereof), they replace such with ignorance, empty materialism, compelled compliance, government licenses, victimless crimes and larceny (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, replacement of perfected allodium for title, funny money, etc.).

The many Cubans that I have been acquainted love the heart’s concept of liberty and individual rights (not considering the actual degree realized in the U.S.). In Cuba, socialism’s natural conclusion of poverty, sufferable evils of an enslaved life style and lack of means to secure liberty and rights combine in most part to abolish any ability to change the forms to which they are accustomed.

Most simply, liberty is: “The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) The breaking of a law of nature's is an act outside liberty.

ken, liberty is as inalienable as rights and you are correct, GOD is our Eternal King. To replace "liberties" with "duties" would make your statement accurate.

Sillik, there is just ONE basic definition of Socialism and your dictionary for mentally ill dupes' definition doesn't come close. Your god's ethos is wrong again. If your definition isn't superior, why do your word salads always go against Socialism's real definition? How would you know if your definition of Socialism required a balanced mind, defining a true ideological expression? — since, you do NOT have a balanced mind! 🤪

Sillik, "democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for supper. Freedom is a well armed lamb contesting the vote" (attributed to Benjamin Franklin) A democracy is a centralized government of carnal gods diametrically opposed to nature's law. Having a god syndrome as you do / declaring that freedom does not exist; your promotion of democracy and socialism is/are a natural digression.

Sillik, is your definition of socialism supposed to be superior to all other definitions because it comes from your god position?

Sillik, 🤪 WHAT? ? ? 🤪 I'm still waiting for your explanation concerning your positions that perform auspicious terms of proof. Your religious dogma stated by way of incomprehensible word salad doesn't work.  AND; your personally fallacious non—definition of socialism from your dictionary for mentally ill dupes doesn't even come close to legal and otherwise dictionaries, encyclopedias or historical use.

Sillik, I shake my lowered head. You make clear at socialism, liberty is not an inherent attribute and right. Socialism is antithetical to liberty. Please give a lawfully (nature's law) detailed description on how liberty can be earned. What training will discipline those that love personal responsibility, truth, prosperity, progression of the noble specie man, individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty / freedom at nature's law.

Sillik, spoken like a self perceived god of socialism. By your definition, under socialism there is no freedom. You double down on socialism's tyrannical usurpation — replacing individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty / freedom at nature's law with socialism's priesthood (government) privilege. 

In the U.S. there are 2 Montessori methods — the American Montessori and International Montessori; - I preferred the International method but, both are far superior to the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land's seminaries (public schools). The above quote is held self evident and absolutely accurate.

Sillik, like a mentally ill child that has had the light shined on them, you once again responded to other than the topic — "freedom". OK, I'll bite on the new topic; "the discovery of our interconnected founding social being connection"? Just another incomprehensible word salad dogma attempt from your religion's fallacious dictionary for mentally ill dupes. As you've stated in the past: "you won't say anything unless you can prove it." Pleas use scientific methodology with examples to prove your statement. By example, I can show socialism (any of various economic, religious and political theories, philosophies or movements outside nature’s law advocating collective or governmental / religious ownership and administration of property {real / chattel / sensorial beings, etc.} along with the means of production and distribution of goods.) to be detrimental to the human experience (authors thereof; Marx, Stalin, Hitler, Mao).

"Truth:? The earliest Old Testament use of truth differs in definitions from Greek, Latin or today's use. Truth, from the Hebrew feminine noun אֶמֶת ʼemeth, (pronounced eh'·meth); is the palpable source and physical materiality of existence as well as, essentially related fact and evidence. Truth there expresses the absolute of a physical event. Is that a great measure of absolution?

Sillik, spoken like a true socialist. "Freedom is the construct and illusion of the child." Freedom in reality "IS" at the "law of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) Finally, you have said something accurate, socialism is an exercise in pain, poverty, enslavement, and otherwise antithetic to the nobility of man.

At nature's law, inalienable rights and liberty with the freedom to exercise such inherent distinctions are innate in the being. “Risk”? - probably, to secure individual nature’s rights, liberty and freedom in ANY society there will always be a certain effort and risk. Any assembly of righteous persons that inherently abide individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature’s law may be measured by the lack of restricting codes and rules. By objective observance; prior to a decade or so before the war between the States, there were no policemen. There were only elected sheriffs with free parties assisting where necessary. The war’s victors evolved an exponential increase of usurpation, tyranny, socialism, slavery for all with a general degradation of carnal gods / fleshly lawmakers anti-nature’s law life style. The carnal gods continue to increase their plethora of laws made for our personal safety, converting the land into a nursery where policemen serve and protect the governing malefactors will against a once free people (NOT ! ! ! serving or protecting WE, the individual sovereigns). The more corrupt the system / people become, the greater the need for governing laws and policing agents.

There is no cost of liberty. Liberty is an inherent element of the being at nature's law. The price of repression (malefactor's salary, lack of productivity, etc.) is directly related to the degree of repression. There is a cost (lives, education, etc.) to liberty's defense.

Sillik, 🤪 — wrong again. Only a damn fool would ignore every socialized (socialism's) path as such has uniquely resulted in totalitarian induced pain, poverty, slavery, war and otherwise, inappropriate human stances. Your godly syndrome advancement once more further's another socialist's dogma: "a lie told often enough becomes the truth." (Lenin). NOT! ! !

Sillik, you are at least, if nothing else, a consistent mentally ill child. As I've stated before, when a child / very immature other is caught, they change the subject — hoping to not have the light shine so brightly on their oops. You are the poster child for such. Above, I proved at fact and law your god complex / religious banter to be wrong. Simply changing the subject will not excuse you lying in the future (now that you proven the truth).