Mr Archer, 
      Whatever your government is it's not effective. Your just a bunch bullying criminals in the final analysis.  Socialism is ruled by the laws of nature and believes the nature of humans are honorable. Nature is not corrupt, but is tampered by selfish individual that "turn their back on mother nature" and credit gods for her great efforts.

Mr Archer and Mike Norwalk Im sorry fellas psychotic opinions don't hold much weight with me. They define you fellas, however.

I am one man, a Social responsible individual against a whole planet of Psychotics. The "feeling" you discribe is pure projection.

Sorry Mr Archer, 
      Socialism is Socialism. It was the wrong phrasing on my part to say my brand. I'm the only one that defines it in my view. 

Mr Archer, 
     "Lay claim to your labors." I don't agree with Karl Marx a lot, but he was right when he claims the only item you produce is your grave diggers.  Socialism will make you productive for first time in your life.

Mr Archer,
      My Socialism is correct simply because your idea of it comes from the Psychotic dictionary. In my case the name is correct, just this time the architect has a balanced mind.

Every citizen should be a diplomat with proper manners, courtesies, kindnesses, and morals. Greece and Rome fell because they did not have these.

Correction: 
Mr Archer, 
     The brand of Socialism I present to you propagates from the heart and soul of one individual. That individual is Fredrick William Sillik and his heart and soul dictionary.  Socialism is idea we use our social abilities to sustain life.

Mr Archer, 
When I was younger there was what individuals called the cold war.  The Union Soviet Socialists Republic vs the good ole US of America. Well the USSR claimed Socialism and built many nuclear weapons.  The United States claimed freedom and democracy and built many nuclear weapons.  Both eventual built enough to destroy all life many times over.  This dementia ridden perspective made me look to other sources for freedom,  democracy,  Socialism. The brand of Socialism I present to you comes the heart and soul of one man. That man is Fredrick William Sillik and his human heart and soul dictionary.

Mr Archer
Are you saying there are no people in government?  Government is just this lifeless instrument that rules our lives?

Sorry Mr Archer:
The fact that individuals will live well coordinated, well planned out, orderly, healthy lives definitely will be quite reasonable and acceptable under the auspices of what is labeled the New World Order is quite positively excellent. Absolutely.

One comment, one quote except in dialogue. Mr Archer, are we not a government of the people?

Mr Archer, 
      I'm sorry I don't know how to respond to what you have just posted. I was, however, wondering if you would change course and join me in a little exchange in regard to an examination of the present state of affairs. Can you possibly describe a specific problem our nation faces at this point and time? Is there any specific flaws in the American system that you observe? Can you share some kind of criticism of nation's strategy or approach? Please!

I am of the tolerant minority. The educated individual that realizes that to feel is to understand and to touch is something different.

Mr Archer, 
      Both a reformer and liberal are defined by change. You have no such creature in your conventional world. You just have meaningless labels. Socialism is the idea that we use our social abilities to change the world.

An accompanying thought: with me and your judgements of me. I am not what you see, I am what you feel. If you judge with me without having a heart to heart you will be wrong. And you must have a heart to have a heart to heart.

I do not desire a slave, and I don't want to be a slave.

I'm sorry editor and all I deviated from one quote, one comment desire. I'll try not do that again. This can of worms was just too tempting. Sorry, Sorry, Sorry!

There must be a differentiating course between violence and revolution. Every upset individual on a mass murder spee probably justifies their action as some kind of revolution.  This reasoning leads me to declare a revolution can only be peaceful.

And to keep it objective Abraham, Martain, and John were not our friends as the lyricists Dion sang, they were just too mentally unsound. Mentally sound individuals are always a friend.

You might also wonder why Jacqueline Boviuer Kennedy would want to kill her husband? It's a multifaceted culmination  of competing forces that lead to this drastic action.  With the duration of time I hope to explain the whole situation. But I will leave you with this: Mrs Kennedy had the same characteristic approach as Coretta Scott King and Mary Todd Lincoln

You may wonder why my version of the Kennedy assassination is so different from  everyone else's. Well I was not involved in it for one thing. I believe in fair trials as I have posted before. Shear unbiased observation is what ruled my judgement.

The biggest force that oppresses us is ourselves. If this country violently falls it is because it has weakened from within itself. We as a nation must come to terms that our personal relations with our countrymen are not based on honorable intent. Our closest relationships are based on ulterior motives. So we spend our time diverting our aggression on others including other nations. The most publicized relationship of our nation has been the "romantic" stylized goings on of a rich, "handsome,""educated" president and his "beautiful" socialite wife. This masquerade "camolot" affair captured the world's attention only have Mrs. Kennedy shoot President Kennedy at point blank range launching much of his head off his shoulders. It is time that we introduce ourselves to ourselves and make the changes that ensure acceptance.

Criminals use all kinds of coded signal devices to allude detection. Hand signals, skewed or slang wording, you even wonder about a criminal's cough so distance from natural language processes that they maintain.

Heterogeneity is required for survival.