Presumably, Thomas Jefferson referring to inauguration of the United States is considerably bias in his perspective. President Jefferson appears to be forgetting the build in despotism of the new nation. Slavery, class detinquishing features, sexism were and still are the despotisms that keep this national vessel from balancing.

The population citizenry should realize that their "freedoms" do not include the freedom to maim, kill, destroy, rape, and rob. The restraint of these plundering activities allow a moral freedom and a freedom, free of corruption and coercion. All things considered, the United States of America moves ever closer to the revolutionary image as bastion for human growth processes.

Mike Norwalk, you the backwards fellow understands nothing of the evolutionary progressive march forward. Everything matures with time, language included.

This quote is uncoordinated at best, baloney at the least. We are an evolutionary being. We are the governed, but you should never forget you are the government as well if you are a mature responsible citizen. Speak out lucidly, coordinately, elequently and we move in the correct direction of life, liberty, and happiness.

Was it minority rule?  Shouldn't we exam this matter of the "founding fathers" minority with sufficiently much more studied componential measure?

The social revolutionary wishes individuals to attain the ability to control themselves. The Socialist(social revolutionary) wishes others to follow a path to recover their own humanity instead of the present preditory interest in recovering others humanity. Recover your own humanity.

Correction: A criminal individual is an individual who performs crimes against humanity. Sexist, racist, violent aggressive actors against humanity. The criminal controls the vast resources and resists the simplest necessities for the humans. To feed, cloth ourselves as humans is made a tremendous struggle by the criminals. To sleep, go to the restroom is incessantly confounded by you sickos. You criminals resist any authentic education, exercise or any other developmental activities which a Socialist would never be complicit in involving themselves.

Mike, Norwalk the point is to have a law conscious promoting principled foundation for human growth and development. Your description of criminal just keeps the criminal intact with its built in criminal supporting propensities. We are here to eliminate crime because we are not naturally criminal.

Mr Biden, this post is for and to you. Will you stop destroying the world?

Correction #2 didn't get heard in that third sentence, sorry.

Correction: Additionally you criminals I notice try to reverse the situation, you use your majority to make it look like I am the criminal, the habit of lying to yourself comes in handy. You hate the intelligent because they make you feel inferior. For example, I have never President Biden utter anything during his reign. I once heard him say to President Obama when President Biden was vise President, "this is a F***in big deal," I think it would help the world if the President had some semblance of thought processing.

Additional you criminals I notice try to reverse the situation, you use your majority to make it look as I am the criminal, the habit of lying to yourself comes in quite handy. You hate intelligent because you feel inferior to it. For example, I never heard President utter anything during his reign. I once him during his vise president to President Obama "this is a F***in bid deal."It would help if a president had some semblance of thought processes.

A criminal is individual who performs crimes against humanity.  Sexist, racist, violent aggressive actors against humans. They resist the simplest necessities. To simply feed, cloth, themselves is made a tremendous struggle. To sleep, go to the bathroom is confounded by these sickos. You criminals resist any education, exercise activities or any other developmental activities which a Socialist would never be complicit in involving themselves.

Mike, Norwalk have you ever met a Socialist? Could you name him or her?  I have only met dangerous criminal hustlers who took up the label. I am not a dangerous criminal hustler. I have authentic and sincere morals and manners.

Mike Norwalk, being called mentally ill by the only noncriminal mind on the planet, I personally would be concerned, but you are stark criminal and will hold fast that the criminal majority will always protect you.

Mike Norwalk, As always you are not understandable, because you have no position or relevant beliefs. If you look at our past you will find hustlers trying to sell us concoctions from love potions to cancer cures. Socialism has been presented in the same fashion. It was and still is a fashion statement. Now we have a true representative of this ideology, an it is now a functional statement.

Mike, Norwalk you are without a doubt mentally ill. You have no competent message exchange system. Your whole conventional arrangement holds no true value for words. You use the primitive messaging system of the hunter. You exist on the assumption that everyone is signaling for their preditory victim. I, the Social being have never signaled for any victimization. I am quite alone in this characteristic.

Mike, Norwalk, is it possible to make a specified point here?  Will you at least admit that Socialism, is in fact an ideology?

What authority? What skeptic? It appears this fellow is sadly no longer with us. All the same, you existing quote players need specifics, instead of just throwing rubbish out there. Your effort would be more appropriate and appreciated if you would just stop the childish playing and believe in something profoundly real.

Concrete specifics would make the quote make some sense, at this point it make absolutely none.  What humble people? What condescending ideology? This quote manufacturer is promoting the world of make-believe. Wish we had a good personal psychiatrist for him.

Can mommy's little monster appreciate the elegance of a characteristic they are completely disconnected from. 

Is it not the child who intends falsehood, and the adults who intends the truth?

I'm pretty sure 2+2=4, other than that I'm pretty sure my ignorance is very close to infinite.

Is it possible to take an oath against tyranny with a make believe force? Is not President Jefferson using a tyrannical aid to profess some opposition against tyranny? 

Mike, Norwalk, I wholeheartedly disagree with you. The conventional existence is clearly an existing made-up, make believe, environment of social and economic turmoil. We need, Mike, to find the scientific and artistic foundation of mental health.