I don't really know how to respond directly to this quote because of my negative concept of the politics and politicians. My response is this question: If we can find a formula that serves the interest of everyone, will it be repressed? I say its out there somewhere and it will go.

I have to agree with Mr Douglas on this, because I have a negative idea of the concept of power. However, it is the Social being in me that believes in the future it will not be a dominant power that guides us, but a strong conciliatory wise authority that's open to all opinions, options, and ideas. This is the guidance of a democratic social arrangement. Life is not powerful. I serve life. Life is not associated with power. Life is in association with the characteristics of growth. Growth is not powerful, but it grows stronger and stronger. We want a strong governing facility because that's what describes us and our struggling life process.

Specifically, I should say I am suspending written exchanges addressed to Mike, Norwalk for some time until he's takes a more conciliatory stance.

"Developmental" Correction Mr Einstein appears to be associating the above two arrangements without a proper distinguishing the two totally different ways of existence. They are different as death and life. It is important I believe to mention that one, communism, offers development and there is hope for us all.

Limited government is a limited people, for the people are not fully aware that they count as a participate in the governing of the United States of America. The individual tends to let themselves to be influenced by negative groups and forget that nature instills all us with it's capacities. Individualism is the individualism of nature and not the mistaken idea that this fellow espouses, that being the negative influence of past false authorities.

I would just like to add where one can't develop themselves in the fascist mindset, the availability to develop your individual self is unlimited under a Communist arrangement.

Albert Einstein once said that politics was more difficult than physics. What he meant was that social issues are more complicated than physics. At this point I can't disagree. No one in the right mind involves themselves in politics. He also once stated, reports have it, that he knew of only two infinites, the Universe and human stupidity. Neither the material Universe or human stupidity are infinite. An example of two infinites are the capacities of the human body and the human mind. The above quote is uncoordinated in that  it categorizes two completely opposite arrangements under the same symbolic context. Fascism and communism are polar opposites. Fascism is an oppressive negative arrangement based on inequality. Communism is an community based positive arrangement founded on equality, but I bet Mr Einstein could run circles around me in physics. 

Correction: I hear of none wanting to put things in order. The individuals messing things up are the creatures who want you under their control.

Disagree with this misguidedness.  The individuals messing things up are the creatures you want you under their control.

My observations say if you say you are not a racist you are qualified for  full professorship at any University in the world with tenyor.  You will be able to write volumes on the subject. You could fill whole library on the subject. It's that broad. It's a lot more then saying, "no I'm not" when the question is ask. 

Francis Bacon said "knowledge is power." Speaking of power of knowledge I would like to write to my detractors on the subject of racism. Racism is so intricate, so woven into the fabric of our present social arrangement, so broad, and so complicated that for you to say your not a racist would put in the same category of the greatest intellectuals of our species history. In my observations to say you are not a racist is make Einstein appear an intellectual dwarf. I am not a racist.

In dealing with the state, we must as responsible citizens become more respectful and accommodating to our respective institutions. We must monitor their progress and have measurable honorable standards to insure they are achieving their intended respective purposes, to provide moral strength to the United States of America.  Institutions deserve their own television show.

Self-realization of the population reveals that  the people are the government. The individual and the population must understand the importance of broadening and empowering the scope of that government and the interacting role the individual assumes in that government. Give a voice to the people and the future is ours.

Correction:Mr Archer, I never seek superiority, I search for correctness. The correct behavior is supiorer to the incorrect behavior. I simply assert I behave correctly, it's as simple as that. To seek superiority is the path of a foolish child. I try to behave in the most civilized fashion as any adult would prioritize.

Correction: On contrar Mr Wells followers and fans, we have a present order where all the sex trafficers and drug dealers observe their fellow trafficers and drug dealers as graceful and gallant.  The New World Order fellow who wants to end sex trafficking and drug dealing is looked as the great oppressor. The new world order fellow observes only barbarians.

On contrar Mr Wells followers and fans, we have a present order where all the sex traffickers and drug dealers observe there fellow trafficers and dealers as graceful and gallant. The new world order fellow who wants to end sex trafficers and drug dealing is looked as the great oppressor. The new world order fellow observes only barbarians. 

No substance here. The idea of capitalism is just ridiculous for an educated individual or populous. Your carefully plan your economic system in a situation where  everyone receives carefully distributed items they need and every individual is invested in the distribution process. Life is quite simple with educated beings.

Laws are enacted with the pure natural forces considered, there are no angels or deities.

Mike Norwalk, you are clearly taking my words out of honest context here. I did not intend to call black people unreasonable baboons. I had no intent, so I didn't. Mike Norwalk with this clear example of aggressive lying, on your part, I am going to have to suspend written exchanges with you for some time.  I will say I am the only socially responsible person on the planet that desires to solve the terrible race problem we have. I am an integrationist, an individual who wishes to ban nuclear weaponry, this plays a big part in racial animosities and have a social arrangement that values and regards all as equal.

Mr Archer, I never seek superiority, I search for correctness. The correct behavior is superior the incorrect behavior. I simply assert that I behave correctly, it's as simple as that. To seek superiority is the path of a foolish child. I try to behave in the most civilized fashion as any adult would prioritize.

Laws for the child are  concerned with protection of their toys and to make sure no one interferes with their playtime. For adults laws are more of an instructional guide because the adult possess the mature characteristics of deciphering the wrong course from what is correct. 

 Mr Bernays effort is significantly uncoordinated and disconnected, lacking specifics. Children typically like to leave you under mystical eerie delirium. Adults are characteristically coordinated, connected and specific in their  presentations.

Men are duty bound. He refers to boys and their whimsical ways. Adult men want to believe in the components of life that hold up to any opposition, any test of reason and agree on the all connected whole. What is good for one man is good for all men. That is want a man believes. A man's interest is Social responsibility and serving his community. United we stand. United States of America. Unification, Unification, Unification 

This passage has no conclusive meaning. This diatribe demonstrates the value that mental disorder has in securing some kind of "employment?." It's similar to when the poet sings "your charlatan analyst, he's high upon your list."

Thanks Mr Archer, I appreciate your acknowledgement that I am a liberal. This is awareness, on your part, that I am the harbinger of change. What you don't understand is that the child never changes, and the adult develops with every passing second. Parts of you understand the situation, but you are an existing mental battle zone will different notions competing for attention in your fragmented mental arrangement. The "liberal" adult is significantly more unified in his mental arrangement. Nothing's perfect, however, and he also must struggle.