We should, however, be a democracy. Our founders were just too inept and primitive in their depth to understand our human characteristics. Mutually allowing the full rights of expression among our populous would slowly bring understanding and the regenerative processes to the path of the proper ruling inclinations of the people, We the People.

I believe Marcus X is somewhat off here, for the moral method is the only way of protecting our interests or selves.

What kind of an individual can comprehend even the most remote rudiments of liberty and own slaves? 

Seeking not power, but strength is the necessity to gain liberty, all the while searching for command over yourself.

Thank goodness, all those years of watching Laugh-In wasn't a waste after all, "you bet your sweet bippy."

However, a little shot of sweet tea along the course is encouraged, decaffeinated if you can find it.

We need to express and further examine the idea that our founding fathers were in need of great refinement, enslaving human beings after all, savage treatment of the native tribes, the females "put in their place." We must start to really research our foundations to further our cause as the representatives of the human essential.

We need to stop playing court, and bring the real threats to our lives into the courtroom. Marijuana use, alcohol consumption, homosexuality, religion, pornography, medical professionals and procedures, beastiality, etc..,etc. The system is guilty of not performing humanely and needs to be corrected. The system not the individual. The individual is innocent by reason of sanity.

There again freedom, similar to life itself, grows as the individual accepts his role and responsibilities. I am more free then I was before. I am more mature then I was before. I  am more human then I was yesterday. 

The responsible individual has a different insight then your typical conventional individual. Seems the conventional individual believes that liberty includes neglecting the $244,000 we as taxpayers each owe our government, where as the Social being believes that real liberty entails the ability is to return every penny of that sum owed.

A natural state welcomes the efforts of any individual productively moving the environment ever closer to a human condition. 

Primitive statement for with the release of education from it's restraints less and less blood will be drawn in violence and the tyrant will no longer reign or even exist. Adults are never tyrants and Marx's Communism, the social system of adults, will makes it's long awaited appearance in the future, however without Marxism. The peaceful path will be the guide and foundation to liberation and liberty.

The necessity and maintenance of a sane life require that we find a sustainable truth, that what we love is what we need, and that at some time and some way we will find the answers. Socialism is the vision of social abilities to create.

Of what use is someone who's position is built on the rejection of a human stance and that of life as a whole? The English constitution has a built in mental impairment infection and can stand some intense replacement.A human accepts the fact that they can and will undoubtedly be in error, and frequently at that. Life is founded on imperfection. We seek excellence.

This mind rejects anything that clashes with the development of life.

In an inverted social condition legality is simply not going to be moral.

Whatever moves us forward.

 Is  he conveying of the Internal Revenue Service or the International Reject Surveillances? Never like to assume anything. 

"The sword of the law" should never fall on a true friend because he maintains and performs  in the best interest of all.

No "sometimes" about it, the present system is the practice of bullying the resources from the less material advantaged into the hands of those with a dominant presence in material resources. The less material advantaged are challenged to find their human resource allocations and make this resource the master and director of resourcefulness. Hence, 
Mr Sillik's Socialism is the vision of social abilities to create, proves it's value.

Mr Archer: Who is an individual or group that believe that Mr Sowell can't disagree with them, even on the grounds of an honest proven point by Mr Sowell presented to their contrary notions?  Who? Who? Who the hell is he specifically referring to?

Mr Archer: It is safe, however, when it is in conjunction with the laws of nature, which only a damn fool would not follow.

Mr Archer: Is not the moral justification for liberty the greatest force? As long as you can explain the reasons for your liberty and it's benefits will you not maintain and develop it? Mr Archer you simply don't understand that liberty is a growing force and a continued cultivation is needed to its development.

Response to Mr Archer: It is written "that the child is not quite human," and therefore I am left to produce an adult. The Socialist social system is the world of adults and so Karl Marx and I are made to agree on this point.

A fully functional system needs no police because it is being operated by fully certified adults. The present system is clearly being run by a child's mentality evidenced by the fact that residents run about trying to incarcerate each other in a sick game of last one not incarcerated "wins."  Adults simply don't do prisons. Adults trust each other and can be trusted. Adults simply function.