Sorry Mr Archer:
The fact that individuals will live well coordinated, well planned out, orderly, healthy lives definitely will be quite reasonable and acceptable under the auspices of what is labeled the New World Order is quite positively excellent. Absolutely.

One comment, one quote except in dialogue. Mr Archer, are we not a government of the people?

Mr Archer, 
      I'm sorry I don't know how to respond to what you have just posted. I was, however, wondering if you would change course and join me in a little exchange in regard to an examination of the present state of affairs. Can you possibly describe a specific problem our nation faces at this point and time? Is there any specific flaws in the American system that you observe? Can you share some kind of criticism of nation's strategy or approach? Please!

I am of the tolerant minority. The educated individual that realizes that to feel is to understand and to touch is something different.

Mr Archer, 
      Both a reformer and liberal are defined by change. You have no such creature in your conventional world. You just have meaningless labels. Socialism is the idea that we use our social abilities to change the world.

An accompanying thought: with me and your judgements of me. I am not what you see, I am what you feel. If you judge with me without having a heart to heart you will be wrong. And you must have a heart to have a heart to heart.

I do not desire a slave, and I don't want to be a slave.

I'm sorry editor and all I deviated from one quote, one comment desire. I'll try not do that again. This can of worms was just too tempting. Sorry, Sorry, Sorry!

There must be a differentiating course between violence and revolution. Every upset individual on a mass murder spee probably justifies their action as some kind of revolution.  This reasoning leads me to declare a revolution can only be peaceful.

And to keep it objective Abraham, Martain, and John were not our friends as the lyricists Dion sang, they were just too mentally unsound. Mentally sound individuals are always a friend.

You might also wonder why Jacqueline Boviuer Kennedy would want to kill her husband? It's a multifaceted culmination  of competing forces that lead to this drastic action.  With the duration of time I hope to explain the whole situation. But I will leave you with this: Mrs Kennedy had the same characteristic approach as Coretta Scott King and Mary Todd Lincoln

You may wonder why my version of the Kennedy assassination is so different from  everyone else's. Well I was not involved in it for one thing. I believe in fair trials as I have posted before. Shear unbiased observation is what ruled my judgement.

The biggest force that oppresses us is ourselves. If this country violently falls it is because it has weakened from within itself. We as a nation must come to terms that our personal relations with our countrymen are not based on honorable intent. Our closest relationships are based on ulterior motives. So we spend our time diverting our aggression on others including other nations. The most publicized relationship of our nation has been the "romantic" stylized goings on of a rich, "handsome,""educated" president and his "beautiful" socialite wife. This masquerade "camolot" affair captured the world's attention only have Mrs. Kennedy shoot President Kennedy at point blank range launching much of his head off his shoulders. It is time that we introduce ourselves to ourselves and make the changes that ensure acceptance.

Criminals use all kinds of coded signal devices to allude detection. Hand signals, skewed or slang wording, you even wonder about a criminal's cough so distance from natural language processes that they maintain.

Heterogeneity is required for survival.

Pure truth would lead to pure understanding and therefore peace.

Of course Mr Editor Liberty Quotes, of course.

Men don't tend to worry themselves of differing opinions, it's bad boys and girls that tend to become violent when you disagree with them.

Rights, speech, opinions should not be so complicatedly presented.  These components move in the two basic directions, one course favors death. The other course favors life. I favor the later course.

Aren't liberal and reformer synonynomous?

The concept that individuals live well coordinated, well planned out, orderly, healthy lives appears to be quite reasonable and acceptable under the auspices of what is labeled the New World Order. Absolutely! Positively excellent!

Self awareness exploration will allow us to discover the proper inherent liberating forces that exist in the confines of human heart and soul.

Until my neighbor can stop bringing the hellish conditions to the earth in order to acquire their violently attained "possessions" he or she has absolute nothing.

A characteristic of freedom is definitely empowerment. A crazed lunatic with a firearm should not be considered empowerment.  To feel your human abilities growing and developing is empowered freedom.

The independence of the mind grows in solitude because nature is allowed it's connectiveness.