Just once, I'd like to see an anti-gun point of view that is well-thought out, based upon unbiased research, and not emotionally-fueled. I find it interesting that (contrary to the stereotype) pro-gun advocates often tend to appear better informed and more articulate than the average anti-gunner. As demonstrated above, name-calling and insults are often the first and/or last response to anything/anyone supporting the subject of firearms. Sadly, accountability is a dying concept in our society--It's easier to point a finger at an inanimate object and declare it responsible than to accept any responsibility yourself. Mr. Anon: the anti-gun crowd makes no distinction between which guns are acceptable and which are not--There is NO middle ground. Never was. Additionally, it amazes me how anyone could be convinced that law-breakers are going to be affected by new laws. Criminals DON'T CARE. Ben's(of St. Louis) statement is dead-on. How much clearer can it be? "Gun-Free Zones" are simply an advertisement for where the victims are.