[1-25] of 131

Posts from Robert, somewhere in the USA

Robert, somewhere in the USARobert, somewhere in the USA
Robert, somewhere in the USA

We must recalibrate our day-to-day mission to survive; we must put in place instruments that will overcome our servitude not just provide comfortable rhetoric for our friends. We must wake from our slumber of indifference, from our apathy, from our lack of action it's deeds we now want. Enough of religion and words we are in a continual life of war, suffering, hunger, and fear, yet how do we effect change? how do we stop this runaway train with all our hopes and loved ones onboard from total destruction? We need heroes to come forward and show us the way; we need the candlestick maker to put down his apron and take on the power within us all. 

Robert, somewhere in the USA

The founding father's were mostly Liberals it's so sad how we have all been hoodwinked by propaganda and how we today demonize a word that historically has always been about fairness. The current political system has ruined the true meaning of Liberal I wonder what next word will be made dirty.... In the meantime I suggest you all look up the Oxford Dictionary definition "Liberalism" Well, to save you the time here it is:
‘one of the basic tenets of liberalism is tolerance’
'Willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas'
'Favorable to or respectful of individual rights and freedoms'
I think there have been liberal amounts demonizing the word Liberal.

Robert, somewhere in the USA

The same statement would be perfect for an America to say today...

Robert, somewhere in the USA

Yes you can... for such a dumb statement and it has 40 comments wow! Double thumbs down!

robert, somewhere in the USA

A bit verbose, otherwise spot on....

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

To have one government means you have no voice whatsoever. You will have no rights and no say in how you live your life. This is why the US and it's western allies want war with Russia - we must keep two or more separate entities. This is why Israel too wants war with Syria and Iran. WWIII would also wipe out debt and reduce the population, that is of course if there's a world left over....

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

I think we are all in agreement on this one! well, nearly...

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

The more centralization you have the more you are controlled and become a slave to the system. UN, CFR, NWO, EU, etc., etc. And who is in charge of these organization's - well, what's happening is they are all being consolidated into one giant indivisible secret club of which you are not a member. The motive is not the well being of those they are meant to be responsible for but those who sit behind the curtain. Individual and national Sovereignty will be a thing of the past - it will become global sovereignty - you will be made to become a member of this one order. This order realizes that our tiny little planet we call home cannot survive with a population that is out of control gobbling up all the resources. This why Russia is being earmarked for a take over as they have more resources by far than any other country. We are being killed by Wars, GMO's, Chem trails, injections, etc., etc. and by the very food we eat. Suddenly the mortality rate is in reverse. All this while club members enslave the masses and get power and wealth. All this will not matter if America goes to war with Russia. It will all go back to zero. Even those who have fled to new Zealand will not be saved from such an occasion. Our sovereignty is being attacked by unknown forces - we are at the tipping point. If we remain silent then the club will have its way and all will be lost. So, live well, live and be happy and remember, they can never take away your love.

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Ten Stars: Wow! what a lot of comments - perhaps we could pin this on the door of every child's bedroom, as I believe it's to late for their parent's. He tried to create an Indian state west of the Mississippi but, as usual, he was killed by the US Army.
Then the Army moved in followed by the settler's.

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

It's a no brainer! who said "Only atheists are thinking men"
Yes There Is a Constitutional Separation of Church and State
By Dale Hansen
Perhaps nothing is more important to American politics than a well-reasoned debate. Unfortunately, far too many people are ill-informed to make such discussions possible.
An excellent example of this comes from the responses to an article I wrote examining the concerns of conservative Christians over Tennessee schools’ teaching the five pillars of Islam. While there were a number of topics that readers could have discussed, by far the most outrage centered on my statements regarding the separation of church and state. Comments included “Clearly, someone hasn’t read the Constitution, because there is no such thing as “separation of church and state” in the US Constitution.” “Where exactly in the U.S. Constitution does it address “separation of church and state?” and “Simply put, nowhere in the First Amendment does the phrase ‘separation of church and state’ exist.”
It seems that to some people, if the words don’t explicitly appear in the constitution then the idea they refer to isn’t constitutionally guaranteed. Viewing it in these simplistic terms is meant to dismiss the entire argument; as if every decision based on the separation of church and state is somehow invalid because the term separation of church and state doesn’t appear in the constitution.
Of course the problems with this assertion are many. First and most basic is the fact that the Supreme Court is the ultimate interpreter of federal constitutional law. This means that while the term “separation of Church and State” may never appear in the constitution itself, the Court ruling in the case of Everson v. Board of Education stated “the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect ‘a wall of separation between Church and State.’”
A quarter century later, the case of Lemon v. Kurtzman further defined this separation when it established the Lemon Test to determine if a law violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment. Every ruling since has confirmed that, in the view of the highest court in the land the Constitution created a separation of church and state.
Having said that, the separation of church and state is hardly the first unwritten concept that is protected by the constitution. In the 1973 case of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court established a women’s constitutional right to have an abortion despite the word abortion never appearing in the constitution. In the 2015 case of Obergefell v. Hodges the Supreme Court established that laws against same sex marriage were unconstitutional despite the word marriage never appearing in the constitution. In the 1963 case of Gideon v. Wainwright the Supreme Court established that the constitution guarantees the right to an attorney despite the words public defender never appearing in the constitution. In the 2010 case of McDonald v. Chicago the Supreme Court established that the second amendment right to bear arms included the right to bear arms for self-defense despite the words self-defense never appearing in the constitution.
It should also be noted that of the 112 Supreme Court Justices, none of them has been an atheist. In fact 92 pecent of them were Christian. What rationale would these justices have for making laws that would create a legal prejudice towards their system of beliefs, especially if the separation of Church and State is a misinterpretation?
The reality is that the constitution was never meant to be a stagnant document that was rigidly adherent to the words on the page. As Thomas Jefferson said “The constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist, and shape into any form they please.” Over the past 200 years the Supreme Court has shaped the constitution to contain a clear separation of church and state that protects every religion equally. If only those who argue against this separation could see how they benefit from it instead of inappropriately interpreting it as an attack on Christianity.

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Love it! but head in the sand works just as well... Also his:
"In seeking wisdom thou art wise; in imagining that thou hast attained it - thou art a fool."

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

The trouble is, the Press lost that right sometime ago as they are now the propaganda arm of the CIA/MIC - the real masters behind the curtain.

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

The trouble is, the Press lost that right sometime ago as they are now the propaganda arm of the CIA/MIC - the real master behind the curtain. And the people don't share their thoughts as they are too scared, and hide within their bubble, too afraid to step out. The American people have their heads in the sand and wish to keep it there. As an example, where is the outrage from the public over the genocide being carries out in the Yemen by Saudi Arabia with the help of the US. Though this quote is said with good intentions, alas today it carries no weight. America is now ANYTHING FOR A PAYCHECK...

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Read your history: The constitution was created by Liberals and primarily James Madison who was a classical Liberal. The media and the tyrannous leaders in power have corrupted the word as now Liberals are pro corporate and neocons re war, etc. MSM has also bastardize the word "Left" All this has been created with propaganda and the evil strategy to divide the populous like MIC is doing in Europe and the Middle East. Look at what's happening in the Yemen - one the worst Genocides being committed by Saudi, with the help of the U.S. and yet the media is silent. NO OUTRAGE! if we had the same outrage as we did about kneeling over the pledge things may have been different - but no, we are all so wrapped up in our little bubbles and we don't want them burst.

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Can't wait! I have my favorite wine ready for the occasion....

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Patrick, I really must correct you. The very last thing the journalist class can be called is LEFT (it use to be liberal but that term too has been bastardized to the max)- Journalism today is so far right it falls over itself doing what they are told to do. MSM is owned by a very few giant corporations and they in tern with the MIC tell MSM what to print and say. Yes, Goebbels and Bernays would be proud of our fascist state.

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Archer, look up the history of the word and you will understand how the Left and the Right are defined. Those on the left represent the people (the workers and the artisans) and those of the right represent the aristocracy. Today propaganda and the misuse of the original definition have be bastardized - very much like the term Liberal has been bastardize. Liberals today are neocons, the same as the neocons on the right (the two parties have become one; Fascist). Which is why we are in a hopeless position/state. Yes, personal responsibility is paramount if society is to flourish, alas, an administration is required to govern the affaires of the state - this governance must be total subservient to the people and not the other way around. Progressive today means the Green Party as anyone in their right mind would neither call the democrats and the republicans progressive. Progressive means: the real left, the radical left; it means free healthcare for all, no more wars, no support of wars, public education for life, money out of politics, hand counted paper ballet's, term limits, close all foreign military bases, bring all our troops home, cut the military budget in half (or more), end the drug war, replace plastic with biodegradable hemp, no mandatory vaccinations, get rid of the CIA and the NSA and all the other 16 secret organization, get rid of the federal Reserve and putting the money back into the hands treasury, zero bailouts for banks, no giant monopolies and a lot more - that would make a very good start. I doubt very much if the above gets any sympathy from those on this blog which is why I normally stay away from commenting.

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

That will be the day - hopefully, the word is not "Left" but "Progressive" and that I look forward too! though we all know that the deep state will never let that happen....

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

They use to be, but now they have become a vehicle for corporate and MIC propaganda and voice piece for our fascist government...

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

five stars for its irony and minus five for its stupidity...

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

This deserves six stars. Centralization is the curse of all freemen.. and the reason we have wars... and a degradation of our rights....

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Force always attracts Governments of low morality and with NO integrity.

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Projectionism... I agree with Archer - just get rid of it! Though I'm not sure what the solution is as Democracies doesn't work either - Socrates was right on the button as far as that is concerned and he got killed for it!

Robert, Somewhere in the USA

Security is a double edged sword - the more you have the less freedom you have..

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.