[1-13] of 13

Posts from gunny cee, Durham

gunny cee, Durhamgunny cee, Durham
gunny cee, Durham

I for one have seen enough of "real life" where people are minced, chopped, burned, and otherwise slaughtered. Does that mean that everyone else should be exposed to these horrors? We know there is a seedy underbelly to all societies, but we don't need to teach our kids that this is "the way it is." Bull! We work hard to provide a decent environment for our loved ones, away from those who live in the seedy side of life. If you show enough of the weirdos of the world, people may begin to think it's normal to live that way, just like the homosexuals have dumped their vile life-style into our schools, military, and place of business. What next? Pedophiles suing for equal status in society?

Gunny Cee, Durham

Makes no sense to me. The Middle Eastern societies thrive on the concept of revenge and they are among the craziest people on the face of the earth. If your wife is looked upon by a male other than in your family, you must kill him. When you kill that man, his family is blood-bound to kill you or someone from your family. Where is the profit in that? How is gratitude expensive? A simple thank you is enough for most people, at least in my world.

Gunny Cee, Durham

Well-meaning, but misplaced honesty can be just as devastating as out-and-out liars. It's when people can't tell the difference betweeen one and the other that the real harm is done. Liberals are so atuned to bold-faced lying in order to advance their agenda, they don't even understand the concept of honesty. To liberals, everyone lies, it's just natural to them.

Gunny Cee, Durham

I'd further suggest that Sam Adams was a damn fine prophet since he saw Roe v Wade and Brown v Board of Education a couple hundred years before they occured.

Gunny Cee, Durham

Whoa there Waffler! It's you who are the clown. What Mr. Adams was referring to is judges who make laws from the bench. Two fine examples are Brown v the Board of Education and Roe v Wade. These laws were made without the consent of the people and reflected the beliefs of a particular group of people...your people...noodle-headed liberals. Laws are created by Congress which are, the last time I checked, elected representatives of the people. Laws created by any other means is just another way of controling the people against their will. When the Supreme Court makes a law (unconstitutionally, by the way) it takes an amendment to the Constitution to undo it. And now that those laws have precedence, it is practically impossible to reverse them. Liberals are famous for going to the courts to get their way since they cannot get congress to agree to their nonsense.

Gunny Cee, Durham

I think Waffler is just about as cluless as any human being can get! Anyone who does not do what he thinks is best for himself and his family is a total loser. "Rugged individualism" is what made this country great. It's you noodle-headed liberals who think that taking risks to, preparing onself through education and hard workl is "Rugged selfishness." To blame corporations for the high unemployment problem is like blaming the dog for the rain. Corporations were not formed to provide jobs for you my friend. The fact that they create jobs is a nice side-effect and a plus for any community who happens to have that corporation in their tax base, but no, they were never meant to provide jobs for the general population. They are meant to make a profit for the shareholders and for those who formed the enterprise. The people who work for the corporations get good value for their labor, or they would find other employhment. The government was not formed to create jobs for you either Waffler. You progressive twats need to wake up and smell the coffee. NOBODY owes you a damn thing, Waffler. You owe it to yourself to either get a job or create one. That's what this country was formed for in the first place. We escaped a system where the King told everyone what to do, where craft guilds held people down and prevented anyone from having jobs unless they belonged (sound familiar to Unions?) and where the King even told you what religion you had to bow down to. It's you clowns, Waffler, who would love to bring this country back to those days where you had no responsibilites and you were told exactly what to do and when. It's you idiots who don't seem to realize that freedom and equality are not part of the same equation because you can never have more of one without having less than the other. GET IT?

Gunny Cee, Durham

I don't know what the Waffler is smoking but he has his facts totally backwards. It was the Republican dominated House and Senate who created the surplus just as they had promised in their "Pledge to America" in 1994. Clinton wisely saw that he had no choice but to sign the necessary bills. It was the DemocRATs who screamed and hollered about how school children were going to starve because of "cuts" in the budget. We also heard horror stories of little old grandmothers who were forced to eat cat food to have enough money for their medications. All was subsequently proved to be bunk. It turned out the the Repupblicans weren't cutting anything from the budget but were increasing it. Somehow the DemocRATs figured that because increases of entitlements by 10 percent instead of the 20 percent they wanted, it was considered to be a "cut" in the budget! We (both sides of the aisles) know how to cut waste and reduce spending to manageable levels, but when the right tries, the left screams bloody murder. So far we haven't seen the left try to cut waste and reduce spending so we don't know how the right would react. I can only imagine there would be dancing in the streets. I expect when the Republicans take over sans the "moderate progressives", we are going to hear a lot of screaming, moaning and gnashing of teeth from the left.

Gunny Cee, Durham

MacArthur was a brilliant general, however, he became arrogant to the point of forgetting that the president has the ultimate say in all matters military. He was knocked off his pedestal although many people were not happy to see that happen. Irregardless, his belief that the price of our liberties is inescapable if we are to keep them intact is valid. Too many people for too long have thought that we have to "go along to get along." We now know that by doing so, we are giving our tacit permission for those who would destroy our liberties to forge ahead with their nefarious plans. Just when I had given up all hope of our salvation as a nation, the common sense, God fearing Tea Party shows up to save the day. All who love this country and what it stands for need to fall to our knees and thank the Almighty for these Tea Party participants who may just save the day yet.

Gunny Cee, Durham

This bit of droll wisdom was never truer than today. I think we'll have some deeply delighted people come this November 12th when Dirty Harry Reid and Nancy (airhead) Pelosi, and Barny (lollipop) Franks come tumbling down and in 2012 when their nibs Mr. and Mrs. Arrogance will be knocked off their pedestal.

Gunny Cee, Durham

If all of the world's major governments were to be represented by a snake eating itself, there would only be the head left. I'm not sure what that means to liberal socialists, but it tells me that without a body, the brain is pretty much useless. “James Madison said that if men were angels, no government would be necessary and if angels governed men, no limits on government would be necessary. Because neither men nor the governments they create are angelic, government and limits on government are both necessary for ordered liberty. Politics may tell us what we want to do, but the Constitution tells us what we may do and we must keep those separate. The ends do not justify the means for one simple reason – liberty. Liberty requires limits on government power, it always has and it always will. Obama is showing us today how to govern by ignoring both the Constitution and Congress. In the case of this new Presidential Advisory Panel being used to create a brand new beauracracy that will set forth new and fairer rules of morttgage lending is yet another end run of our Constitution, and Congress. If we wanted to be governed by an advisory panel we would have dispensed with the election of representatives and presidents and hired an advisory firm to make our decisions. The Constitution forbids the government to do anything that is not given in the constitution. When are we going to get back to the Constitution and quit treating it like an irrelevant document. Obama's utilitarian philosophy that usefulness trumps beauty and all other considerations considers the Constitution a hinderence, therefore is not useful to his efforts to fundamentally change America. He is showing us that even if we take control of both the House and the Senate, he doesn't need cogress to impliment his plans. To him and his minions in the White House, there are no limits to goverment. Politics rules. We are doomed as a nation if we don't stop this tryannical egoist from running roughshod over the wishes of the people.

Gunny Cee, Durham

Let me quote John Adams to our liberal friends: "Our Constitution was made for only a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." Enough said.

Gunny Cee, Durham

Waffler -- subsidizing the church with tax deductible contribution is evil? Yes, I guess in your feeble brain that would be true. The churches shouldn't be getting any money to do their charitable work, only the government is supposed to do that. God forbid any cuts in spending or reduction of taxes so people would be able to spend their own money that they earn instead of having it redistributed by Obama to his cronies in the Unions or diminishing his ability to outspend any candidates who would dare run against him. You greater good dopes keep forgetting that someone has to decide what is the greater good. Apparently you think that those people are Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid. All of the biggest losers on the planet!

gunny cee, durham

Liberals can never admit to the truth or be honest about their agenda because that would expose them for the weasels they really are. If they told us what they really believe about blacks, their whole program would fail. If they told us what they really believe about the poor, their hypocrisy would be exposed to the whole world. They don't hate the rich, they ENVY the rich and will do all they can to bring them down and then elevate themselves to that status. It's what all this crap is about!

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.