[1-25] of 9872

Posts from mike, Norwalk

mike, Norwalkmike, Norwalk
Mike, Norwalk

Nature's law restrains nothing, it only defines. Only in man's thought, argument or reasoning can a restraint be associated to that which is called law. By example; a man may reason that it is a restraint to not be able to walk from mountain top to mountain top in a straight line through the air (gravity being the restraint). In fact, the law of gravity is known and consistent, neither a restraint or incitement / advantage  it just "is". Only through a despot's ideology and tyrannical enforcements can a restraint be considered legal.

Mike, Norwalk

Not shooting the messenger, YES. Compelled compliance by government is a violation and punition against the nature of the noble specie man. Wether of not your personal beliefs or actions include imbibing in chemical spirits, it is lawfully an individual choice. The consequences of a party's actions are also personal, possibly entering the domain of justice.

Mike, Norwalk

Not shooting the messenger; The “laws of nature and of nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence) was to be the existential jurisprudence of a de jure States united. That rightful reality has been replaced with a criminal justice system of despots using a philosophy of men (gods) - (mainly legal positivism, legal realism and maritime jurisdiction executed on land). Carnally compelled compliance, victimless crimes, governmental licenses, larceny (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, etc.) are all violations of the noble being man, nature’s / constitutional law, and eternal justice.

A crime is; “an offense against the state that is punishable.” (Collins Dictionary of Law) “A crime is an offense against a public law.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) A crime then is not a description of a law infringement but rather, an act contrary to carnal god’s legislation or whims. Any use of the term “justice” associated with/to such criminal system is nothing more than a slaver’s retribution.

Life and liberty are not as much endangered from such anti-lawful methods as they are extinguished. Current system administrators are not just life, liberty and law breakers, they are criminals in their own enclave.

Mike, Norwalk

Hmmm, a tad bit Draconian. As the story goes, Draco established capital punishment in Athens for all crimes (small to great). So few misdeeds occurred immediately thereafter that fellow Athenians showed their gratitude by showering Draco with hats, coats, clothing, etc. while on stage; so much so that he was suffocated. ;-) Again I say hmmm, so much for Draconian restraints.

Mike, Norwalk

hahaha / lololol Sillik, wrong again attributing all that negativity was NOT directed at or associated with social responsibility or promoting progress. The negativity was the truth as it correlates to the social being afflicted with the mental illness socialism. No matter how hard your religion dictates, you can't change the facts.

Mike, Norwalk

hmmm, I like it a lot, it speaks for itself.

Mike, Norwalk

The first question that has to be ask is: what is an institution of liberty? The court is not. The court is an institution of justice  adjudicating breaches of law. The legislature is not. The legislature is to enact limited rules of order in accordance and harmony with nature's law. The executive is not. The executive is to administer that which is legislated. Liberty is a natural outcome  cause and effect of nature's law recognition and deference. Is the entire system as a whole an institution of liberty? Maybe / maybe not! Is the whole a simple some of its parts or, a new creature all together?

Mike, Norwalk

Those in the Socialist progressive state of mind are the epitome of childish disorder, chaos, delusion, destruction, poverty, pain and all that is antithetical to the noble being's existence.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, your circular word salad is childishly absurd. Can you step up to an adult world and use a scientific / mathematic or otherwise real elucidated method to describe something other than emotional ad hominems?

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, I'm sure my definition of a conventional traditional manner and yours differ greatly. I did not participate in divide and conquer or any race supremacy strategies. Since you know so much about me and my business, please be detailed (names, dates, times, facts, details, etc.) in describing my business and how I utilized "divide and conquer" and "race supremacy". Also, what did I do, say or otherwise that which would make my competition look unacceptable while I made myself appear acceptable. Sillik, your false accusations only go to prove you are a childish liar with no truth or reasoning being in you. 

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, your destructive socialistic rhetoric is a propaganda lie ab initio. Your anti-reasoning is upside down, inside out and just wrong. A constitution guided by reasonable principle would manufacture NOTHING ! (maybe tyranny) Law (nature's law, not man's philosophies) abiding sovereigns are the basis and sum total of a reasonably principled constitution.

Mike, Norwalk

Today's blaring example of the quote is Trump. Compelled compliance, victimless crimes, government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, Social Security, funny money, etc.), NON-recognition of perfected allodium, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law are also great affirming examples of the statement's topic. 

Mike, Norwalk

By way of further clarification. Nature's law (the laws of nature and of nature's God (Declaration of Independence)) is the "law" (definition of an absolute(s)). All else is man's philosophy or religion. Natural law is a corporeal man's observation, moralizing the acts therein. The de jure States united founders used their natural law observations of the law of nature to construct administrations that were shown throughout history to best enhance and secure inalienable rights, liberty and justice.

Mike, Norwalk

Editor, can you check my subscription and hook me back up?

Mike, Norwalk

The socialistic phrase "of the people, by the people and for the people" diverts focus and understanding of what a "republican form of government" is. A republican form of government at nature's law "IS" a body of individual sovereigns united in recognizing, administering and enhancing each heir to Eternity's King inalienable rights and liberty. There were no tyranny (law) enforcement (police) in the de jure States united until a short time before the War Between the States. After the war, the victors implanted their tyranny enforcement officers throughout the new Unconstitutional government.

Mike, Norwalk

Editor, if possible, can you put me on the list again to receive daily quotes? Thank you

Mike, Norwalk

Extraneous to Constitutional / nature's law exists a philosophy of carnal despots recognized as a criminal / justice system. A crime is; “an offense against the state that is punishable.” (Collins Dictionary of Law) “A crime is an offense against a public law.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) A "crime" does NOT designate the breaking of a Constitutionally recognized law at nature ("the laws of nature and of nature's God" [Declaration of Independence]) but rather, an infraction of carnal god's legislation or policy. Though it is EXTREMELY REPREHENSIBLE for tyranny enforcement officers to be held to different rules and standards than the enslaved chattel, it fits well within the parameters of the immoral criminal justice system.

Mike, Norwalk

Editor, I'm still not receiving daily posts.

Mike, Norwalk

Within the de jure States united (a republican form of government at the laws of nature and of nature's God) each sentient being is an individual sovereign (heir to Eternity's King) with inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Legitimately and at law, each sovereign has no superior overlord (government). Each sovereign united, hires subservient parties to protect each and every inalienable right and liberty at law and to administer justice. Brandeis (a self professing god) speaks of a socialist or other system outside the de jure States united's jurisprudence.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, who's perception of decency, and liberty demands a foreign third party (government) to rule with what/who's proven principles. Socialism's proven principles are just another form of debauchery, pain, poverty for the many and slavery for the collective chattel. Security is a totalitarian despot's myth. 

Mike, Norwalk

Sellik, please enumerate in a provable list, your lies concerning my actions - showing that I am a supremacist, and who my cronies are (by name) along with how they are supremacists also. Please list my and my cronies (specific by name) misrepresentations. Please give all the evidence you have that truthfully depicts my, and my cronies racist views. To the rest of your lying diatribe / circular word salad / mentally ill messiah complex declarations, please be specific in your proof.

You being: “clearly the only responsible person on the planet who is not race conscious” (messiah complex) would know that, socialism (all chattel being equal) is a most heinous form of slavery; only the carnal gods are above the fray. Your comment the other day concerning each person being an individual sovereign (“to many chiefs, not enough Indians) is a socialist’s concept that describes a socialistic system where not everyone is equal. Like a good / typical socialist, you need to continually change the meaning of words and concepts.

Mike, Norwalk

The "A" from Reston  Its not just King George but every Executive member of the UNI-Party

Mike, Norwalk

Editor, can you please check my information with you, I am not getting your posts and have to specifically check in. Thank you for your years of phenomenal service.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, a generality I most sincerely concur with.

Mike, Norwalk

Sillik, to eliminate the "slave owning attitude" would be started by getting rid of socialism. You may want to read more history concerning George Washington and Thomas Jefferson with their slaves relationships. Your after the fact re-interpretation of reality fails miserably. 

Sillik, PLEASE, describe your "supremist perspective" ad hominem. How is my desire for all of the brotherhood of man to be equal in individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law a supremacist perspective? Your hypocritical circular word salad has NO basis in fact or truth.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.