Mike, Norwalk, what Socialist did not allow you any questions?  I am so apologetic, but I am so bored of your "do you want some weed? or "do you have a cigarette?" questions. I googled the meaning of cigarette and the answer is still no and no I don't want any marijuana.

Additionally, it interesting how it all "played" out. The cold war amounted to the USSR a bunch of undercover thiests and the USA a bunch of undercover atheists. Interesting how the USA claims victory, it looks as though God's lost more prestige then presumed. 

Interesting the Soviet Union was undoubtedly the most powerful Christian force in history. They were an undercover operation of thiests.  This destructive mentality clearly supports this claim of the USSR being the Christian stronghold. Communism has no destructive agenda, it's purpose is to construct the most effective course to human growth.

We as citizens and patriots have a responsibility to unite, consolidate, and help guide the the world citizenship to a more advanced position.  The divisive, alienating, and separatist's attitude of this quote is antithetical to that sane goal. The United Nations headquarters should definitely remain in the United States of America with its specific purpose of initiating a one world governing organization with the best interest of every member of the world's citizenry in mind.

That's synonymous to saying oxygen is the prime target of our lungs. We hope.

The answer to your initial question, Mr Williams, is inequality. Equality is the guide for a moral people, and a moral individual.

Characteristic of a balanced social condition, legality is moral.

Now this quote must be fashionable, because I have to confess I don't know anything about fashion. It would be swell to have some functional observations, however. 

Interesting how this "psychiatrist" fellow would know so much about submitting to authority. The mentally healthy Socialist has a significant behavioral practice of questioning authority.

It is my purpose in life to understand the most functional application in any situation. 

Violence is very fashionable, however, coexistence is functional.  Interesting how the young "ladies" I've met claimed fashion expertise.

Mike, Norwalk, communism is as logical and simple as the formulation of 1+1=2, which by the way you insist on not being "forced" to accept. Mental health is the acceptance of life.

The aim of Socialism is the attainment to the most positive,  productive, promising course to that being called human.

The United Nations, in the acquisitional interest of legitimacy, are required to make developmental organizational designs for a one world governmental arrangement if we are to survive and thrive as a species. 

Isn't this quote just more of "the Norman Lear effect?"

The modern contemporary Communist is not so much interested in the elected, but someone with the ability to properly communicate. 

Can't really understand the point being made in regards to this quote.  Communism is the scientific application to the relations of the world. The science of life depends on a continuation of implementation of nonviolent strategies for living as human beings. Marx and Engels were of a technical approach and concluded a violent "resolution."  The present responsible individual realizes that using violence to resolve violence is quite futile. The refinement of human behavior to a nonviolent excellence is strategy and goal of the contemporary Communistic mental formulation.  The present modern Communist believes, let's find the Communist first and worry about the the technology behind it later.

Pointless, insubstantial, meaningless, uninformed quote. The status quo must treasure your efforts, Mr Johnson.

The idea of government is not to be viewed oppositional or adversarial, but for the responsible it is a necessary device for the development of a civilized social arrangement. 

Correction: To live as a Social being is inevitable for our species. Using the term, and using and living the term Socialism is a developmentally significant difference.

To live as a Social being is inevitable for our species. Using the term, and using and living the term Socialism is developmental  step and significantly different.

The Socialist has the right idea that if you count yourself among the society you are among those trying to improve society and therefore an governing influence. We the people are We the government. You might understand one for all, all for one.

It may be of great assistance to identify the biggest problem we have in the world today.  The biggest problem really wouldn't require a lot of money spent, but simply it's identification and a thorough public analysis. Sexism is the subject. The male and female continue their ancient feud. The sexist mentality is the prime problematic divisive activity of our populous arrangement. It has glamourized and masqueraded the disease of homosexuality. Humans are quite naturally heterogenous and the social arrangement has notoriously tried to force practically everyone into the disease of homosexuality. We need to halt this destructive direction. Males and females must learn to acknowledge and practice respect universally and equally to all members of the populous arrangement so we can deserve to be called a society.

Correction: It's not possible to observe the criminals expressing any disagreement with the laws that clearly favor them. It is the law-abiding naturalist that express disagreement with the laws that clearly promote the "evil empire."

Playing the constitution game is quite illogical and detrimental. The constitution must recognize the course of life and it's priority. The constitution is going to have to incorporate a more scientific principled nature before we can even recognize its existence. It high time we grow the hell up.