Mr Archer, Communism does not carry with it a competition element. These regimes you are referring too were just calling themselves what ever they needed to manipulate, just like the various voting schemer's republics say they are "democratically" electing their representatives.  The conventional homosapiens do not yet properly respect the force and energy of words and language, with the possible exception of the many f-bombs I dropped when I couldn't find my f#'kin phone today, sorry. 

Mr Archer, Communism creates balanced environments for balanced finances, balanced relationships, balanced minds. Communism creates the only circumstances for the authentic human being to be recognizably observed. Everything else is just imitation. Communism is the human placed in proper order. Communism creates human beings.

This is one sick female, there is a functional necessity for the dream plan of the future.  Fascism and Socialism can be substituted respectively as the terms evil and good or anti-social and social. In the social arrangement, as opposed to the anti-social, you live on forever with your invaluable imperishable possession contributions being appreciated through the ages as the building blocks of the human product, the perishable can simply be immediately replaced by typically improved products in the responsible planned societal arrangement.  

Your government responsibility is to recognize in it as any other relationship in which you wish to succeed. Government is just another human relationship, loving, caring, courtesy, and courage.

This fellow seems to be babbling on about nonsense or just plain nothing, that's the juvenile privilege, the adult can't afford such a sick apportionment, the children get all of it. Being real isn't popular or much practiced, but it is a functional necessity.

This is the same common childish attitude that the government is the enemy when we with the mature, we the people, government sense are just searching for the best of all possible relationships. A healthy mentality attitude of not hurting others or ourselves unlike this quotation's ultimate nonsensical goal.  Additionally, this quote contains the same childish make it up as you go Hitler engineered the "Fatherland" crap, when it was clearly the "Fatherland" that engineered Mr Hitler, Mr Trump, or anyone that holds elected office. We the people have always been the government and always will be.

The theory of communism can be summed up in one term: CREATE.

Being a toy is pointless.  Communism has assembled because someone has been drawn to wonder what it really means to be a human being.  

Let those with the most prosperous ideas for all involved, lead. Get involved, everyone. Let the voices of reason be heard.  Universal national housing, eliminate private vehicles and incorporate national transportation, implement national goods and services. 

Childish quotation, men want to be respected and acknowledged for their true authentic imperishable human possessions, thoughts and ideas. True substantial thoughts and ideas take the entire species, actually helping others, to a whole new forward advance. True possessions help all, simply because humans support humans.

We will not be let alone without incorporation of a maturity that directs us away from a predatory attitude to a cultivating mentality. We must make words and language present appropriate meaning and understanding.

You're right, Mike, Norwalk, I should clearly state that any practice of any religion should be treated as a mental disorder.  I don't have a god syndrome Mike, I just practice the natural human scientific inclination of gathering and deducing from the available clues provided a logical explanation for our environmental circumstances. I don't have a mental disorder, I just don't have the sufficient data to be correct at all times. You just keep trying. And although all the conventional folks claim all my conclusions, not the wrong ones of course , the conventional individual tells me basically nothing, if they can help it.

Well, oh, well, ah, oh, Mike,, Norwalk,  curses, curses, drat, out smarted again by my "natural superior."

Mike,  Norwalk, Well, I totally OBJECT to you ever positioning yourself in the place of Mr Archer. Nature distinguishes us all with unprecedented unduplicated individual physical quantities and characteristics. We should be striving progressively to reach the corresponding advanced point on a social level. With the diverse nature and infinite quality of human growth and maturity in full force appreciated I could never assume that Mike, Norwalk is conveying Mr Archer's feelings.  Diversity is infinite. We must learn to appreciate this phenomena. 

In reality the question is stated, as a human being anyway;  am I a positive addition to the relationship with my community?  Inanimate objects concern themselves with being owned.

Please let all justifiably be rewarded for their respective contributions.

We must learn about and accept the differences of others, discover the positive qualities of all of our specie's members. Open our hearts and minds for tolerance and acceptance. We're all in this together. Let us live in harmony together sharing the abundant offerings of the universe in it limitless entirety. 

Mike, Norwalk, well that's my point clearly, we are never reaching or attaining the source of our problems, the service to inanimate objects and not the appropriate services to humankind.  And Mike, I gotta hand it to you, you're actually sounding a little more coherent to me.  Words, Mike, I would just like to make the point, have not really been appreciated in the true sense by this species.  The species have neglected the great positive force of words and language, the true signature and significance of humankind. This negligence must change for a normal practice of individual eloquence.  Have a good day, from your faithful friend always. 

We will find that our search for substantialism will lead us little time for the insubstantial. Atheism is not a religion. It is a principled formulation of no supernatural phenomena. Religion should be treated as a mental disorder. Science entails the search for order.

No, Mr Archer, I have to totally disagree with your summation in that the so called republic is basically periodically electing a temporary king, Camelot and all, very much similar to a monarchy which are both fascist forms, exemplified in there unequal resource distributions. Socialism's emphasis on equal distribution of resources totally rejects fascism.

You're not going to possess a mind, inspiration, free decisions by becoming an inanimate object, this being where the emphasis on acquisition of properties leads.  Feelings, ideas, sensitivities, and sensibilities is how we acquire our needs; homes, supplies, travel, friends, and love.

Property rights are not the priority. Your house, lawn, and automotives have no rights. Human beings are the priority with their ideas, sensitivities and sensibilities.  The less emphasis with the right of an inanimate object and more emphasis on the freedom of human practices the more the forward movement of the species.

This statement/quote is wrong. The Plutocrats have gained an advantage through loose taxation regulations and taken resources from the less advantaged. The Plutocrats have raised prices and at the same time presented less qualified products for valid human consumption. We the people are the government of the United States of America.

Mike,, Norwalk, a colonial issuance of unification with the parent motherland, would have more effectively fueled appropriate emotions and designs of liberty and tolerance for the colony's slave population and other oppressed, then the declaration of separation as the declaration of "independence" turned out to, in reality, declare.

Mike, Norwalk, don't understand too much of you're conveyance as usual.  Unity, unification, unifying is nature's harmonious intent, hence the UNITED STATES  OF AMERICA or UNITED ENGLAND, whatever unites, it all the same to the rational. Mentioning the component of King reminds us however that there, as it turns out, is  not much distinguishing difference with the Presidents, they both appear fueled by the same destructive class based properties. Kings and Presidents, neither appear to enable progress very effectively. We the people rule this country, world, always have, always will.  Voices, not votes, voices of ideas.