The progressive stimulant for growing the American atmosphere is an all inclusive National Housing Project, National Transportation Services,
and a National Goods and Services arrangement.

Could anyone convey a pertinent rational purpose for the White House?  It appears it would be a significant advancement to replace the White House with a more progressive and vigorous organizational department for developing the governmental institution.

Mr. Archer, I believe we lost some some continuity here. I would like to leave this page because you seem to me to be saying, without awareness, that freedom is the "devil's plaything."

Mr. Archer,  I definitely want to be your productive plutonic friend. I believe we are not so much different as we might believe. For at the core we are the same idealogically, we just label it different possibly or haven't found our core and our diversity arrives as all present the different possibilities for overcoming  the many obstacles to the life challenge.

Mr. Archer socializing is Socialism, but socializing in most rational, productive, life promoting manner.  We must eventually agree on all basically sound principles and live in accordance to these principles.  The god folks want to believe that 1+1=3, after all god can do anything. We must all agree that nothing in the universe can change the sound principle that 1+1=2. 

It would be promotionally functional for everyone to enjoy their freedoms responsibly.

Not a particular informative, substantial, or even true statement. The present sick degenerate childish conventional inhabits of the planet have a primitive predilection to control others. Human beings, however, wish to have a positive, healthy control over their own  personal mental and physical facilities.

Not particularly substantial statement, be more meaningful if there was some example to which she is referring.  The reason that prompted the statement would be useful to its understanding. 

Sorry, Mike, Norwalk,  I was intending to respond to Mr Archer and inadvertently placed your post label in the post. Sorry, again.

Pardon me, Mr Archer I got mixed up here and called you Mike,, Norwalk.  Mr Archer, I have to agree to be all there, reality, is a feature of sanity, but courage is another aspect and there's a hint in the belief that one "must have power," to admit reality.

I would keep it trimmed and away from power lines, call Asphlundh tree company regularly to maintain the process. Both my father and I were employed by Asphlundh, my father an actually tree trimmer, me in a less advanced skilled position, groundsman.

I'm sorry Mr Archer, it's simply not enough for a human being to just simply be, that human must be something or they are not to be, human. She must, he must 
grow. A human never asks the Shakespearian question, to be or not to be?  On the contrary the human states: its on, let's go, "tranquility base here, the eagle has landed," what can I produce for my country?, on an on.

Nope, while the kids dread responsibility, adults take on its challenge with the fascination it often entails.

Nope, true freedom allows the best choice to be revealed and illuminated.  Decisions, as a result, are simplified.

Nope, it is children who are frightened of responsibility, adults are involved in the continued process of preparing themselves for any challenge.

Mr Archer, I just want you to know I intend no harm to you.  Peace on earth, good will towards all. If you have a good idea I would certainly pay tribute to you and give you credit.  "You've got that minute, doctor."

Mr Archer, it's not a God like role we can utilize, our desperation is need of an authentic human role of agreement and understanding.

No, Mr Archer, a woman,  true and beautiful for that.

This quote is the illustration of a childish attitude. Violence is not going to be a logical alternative. The source of resources aggressive measures are suppressed by understanding the motivations of the aggression. The human understanding approach is the mentally healthy approach, a credential a conventional psychiatrist would not possess, or the most remote clues to its origin.

Sorry to say about Mr Welch, or anyone, this is not a very substantial quote. This quote is childish, limited in scope and depth.  For substantial credibility we need the actual "measured" variable qualities and the specific responsibilities accompanying the truly free individual. 

The American is different than all the historical arrangements because he's ready to take responsibility. The American offers respectability and honorable behavior, the reclamation of the human design that nature intended.

Prefer to state it, you do your duty and you will earn some freedoms.

Life is a challenge, for "you better be good."

This quote or "theory" doesn't make any sense to me. The change for property with happiness is quite a simple logical substitution requirement for growth. The pursuit of property is a pure childish regressive mental condition expression. Trinkets and baubles accumulation doesn't make anyone happy. Facilities and implementation promote our security, but in the final analysis, it's simply not what you possess that produces happiness, but what your existence has come to represent. 

Correction#2: Investigating this limited childlike assertion, staying positive of course, and making it relevant, we could place it in a more developed mature corresponding catagorization, repairing the statement, by saying we should revere mental illness, mental health, and their distinguishing liberating features.