[1-25] of 8642

Posts from MIke, Norwalk

MIke, NorwalkMIke, Norwalk
Mike, Norwalk

A purest form of "anarchy" would not support the focused subject matter's "vote". An example of the quote would be; Democracy is an ugly form of slavery that allows choice for a new master in any given number of years. A “Republic” has 2 distinct meanings: 1) “it signifies the state, independently of its form of government” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary); and, 2) “A system of government in which each person holds sovereign power and elects representatives who exercise that power. • It contrasts on the one hand with a pure democracy, in which the people or community as an organized whole wield the sovereign power of government, and on the other with the rule of one person (such as a king or dictator) or of an elite group (such as an oligarchy, aristocracy, or junta).” (Black’s Law Dictionary)

Mike, Norwalk

The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has committed a most gross jurisdictional usurpation as part of its socialistic goals. Centralized theocratic dogma, complete with canon now permeates the entire nation from its 10 square miles. The 9th and 10th Amendments have been rendered powerless checks. The national establishment of religion is as (or more) venal and oppressive as the government from which the States united separated.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, it is really sad that collectivists such as yourself can NOT even fathom, make sense of or grasp in any way - in the absolute least, individual sovereignty or "the laws of nature or of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). In the de jure States united the ability, authority and/or power were not to derive from a majority or minority but rather, a representation of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at natural law (with We The People's individual and in concert recognized common law).

Mike, Norwalk

In the de jure States united, a major caveat to the quote would be, principle based on "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence)

Mike, Norwalk

The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has a greater representation by what is currently called the left. Though the de jure States united does NOT fit on the legal scale of left to right, the patrons of said theocracy genuflect in fealty to the dogmas that are antithetical to individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, prosperity for the many and "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). The quote illuminates the reality of the Biden / Clinton / etc. crime families. The left's elimination of the free press also demonstrates the accuracy of the quote.

Mike, Norwalk

I'm not quite sure how to rate this, 5 stars for accuracy or a thumb's down because it is so accurate (and the effect on the innocent). The current affairs concerning mail in voting is an example of the here quote (especially vote early and often). The graft, corruption and out right fraud of the current election is identified by the quote.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, representatives? What are those elected individuals supposed to represent? What do you and each / every, any /all individual sovereigns have in common that can be represented? Representation can't go to the separate and distinct corporeal person each person is different with different needs. Again, what is the same that can be represented? The answer; rights and liberty at "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). Each / every, any / all individuals have the same rights and liberty before the law. In the de jure States united, sovereigns are to hire servants through a democratic process (NOT democracy) to represent their rights and liberty. A democracy does not recognize individual rights or liberty at law; a democracy only recognizes what it perceives as majority of corporeal opinion to create law.

Mike, Norwalk

By personal experience, you are absolutely correct. Once, a long time ago, in a far off land ;-) I was a City and County Delegate. In a State Convention, Candidates presented "A LOT" of incriminating evidence against the popular (?) incumbent a long with a voting record that was contrary to local and State political persuasions. The official vote of the Delegates showed an overwhelming majority for that one candidate (as was heartily booed upon announcement).

Mike, Norwalk

Another caveat to the quote, in the vein of the above Lysander Spooner quote, there are several philosophies of law. The de jure States united were to have a foundational jurisprudence of "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). That jurisprudence as been replaced completely by "Legal Positivism" and "Legal Realism" in an atmosphere of an occupying statist theocracy. Any vote (or counting of vote) in the existing unconstitutional / illegitimate theocracy only goes to further distant the law and destiny of original intent.

Mike, Norwalk

Just another Democrat. ;-)

Mike, Norwalk

Decentralizing government is only a result of recognizing and ensuring individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). A body politic that is made up of We The People's servants (acting at natural law to ensure and enhance rights, liberty and individual sovereignty) — as is violently antithetical to — a supreme regnant (government) with governing leaders/rulers, law makers/enforcers and ultimate authority/power of individuals will only higher sufficient personnel to accomplish the job's duties (local, regional, national, etc.). Some great advances (such as nuclear power) have developed because of the destructive designs of centralized governments BUT, that is not to say the invention would not have occurred sooner if laissez-faire innovation was present.

Mike, Norwalk

AND, government tells you stand 6ft. apart and wear a mask so you can all be good slaves.

Mike, Norwalk

A case in point of: "do as I say, not as I do". Roosevelt, may be next to Wilson in destroying Constitutional law and prosperity. Here Roosevelt speaks a natural law accuracy - hiding the socialist behind the mask. Five stars for accuracy of the statement.

Mike, Norwalk

That is one motivation.

Mike, Norwalk

Can be, not necessarily. When my children were small, duties were performed from love, joy and wanting to. Even the middle of the night / early morning was joyfully agreeable to me. So, by personal experience, I recognize the trait but, it is not universal.

Mike, Norwalk

"Clergy of oppression" is a very accurate and descriptive illumination of the subject matter. The sciences of biology, climate, mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc. formal science, natural science, etc. have all been reduce to political science with little to no reliance on fact or truth.

Mike, Norwalk

Several years ago I read a study on the personalities that become teachers vs. entrepreneurs and employed workers that attempt to advance their careers. It was fairly clear, those that can't do teach. Marx must have understood the reality when he wrote the 10th plank of the communist manifesto. In college business classes, it was told often, never let an attorney or CPA be the president or major voice in your company (I add here, congress) as is covered well by the here quote. That which is called media today is nothing more than missionary work for the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land.

Mike, Norwalk

We hold this truth to be self evident ! ! !  Welcome to a propagandist Amerika.

Mike, Norwalk

The Progressive caricature of self is a vulgar theocratic socialism. The private and expanded collective sensationalizes bigotry by anti-reality propagating (mountains out of mole hills) the trivial and the irrelevant. 

Mike, Norwalk

We hold this truth to be self evident. Culmination of the here quote is witnessed in a well educated (not) Amerika.

Mike, Norwalk

Waffler, your supportive patronage of the totalitarian statist theocracy infesting this land is a demonstrative exposé in a hatred of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and the "laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). The de jure States united was based on secular applications of natural law. The carnal government may be your religion, not mine.

Religion is: a sacrosanct object of conscience (an ethic(s), a moral(s), a value (system) or an orientation of correctness / enlightenment) believed sufficiently conventional as to enable an attributable action(s). Religion’s initiating elements of conscience, through fruition of action, encompasses self-obligated pursuits, imperative practices and devoted interests (by way of extreme brevity / example: safety, health, fairness, life style acceptance, monetary equality vs. equality before the law, and well being). A ‘god’, ‘causation’, or other ‘relegated source’ of such enabling elements may or may not be instrumental (or even useful) in defining religion. (by way of example: Buddhism, Taoism, societal ethics and Humanism are religions without a god or other extra human manifestation). When a god is implemented into a religion it is to justify and make sense of the conventionally held ethics, morals and beliefs.

Religion is: “ real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to ⋯ our fellow men.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) This definition’s focus is on “real piety in practice” - and - “the performance of all known duties” - again, a sacrosanct object of conscience believed sufficiently conventional as to enable attributable actions (socialism or democratic socialism are destructive economic systems in and of them selves – not religion; BUT! ! !, when socialism is forcibly implemented by reason of ethics, morals, orientation of correctness, real piety in practice or, felt/believed sufficiently conventional as to enable performance of all known duties to a fellow man, socialism becomes a religion).

Webster's New World Dictionary - Fourth College Edition uses a slightly different vantage on Bouvier’s “fellow men” by stating, Religion is: “a.) any specific system of belief and worship, often involving a code of ethics and a philosophy [the Christian religion, the Buddhist religion, etc.] b.) any system of beliefs, practices, ethical values, etc. resembling, suggestive of, or likened to such a system [humanism as a religion] ⋯ any object of conscientious regard and pursuit.”

“we did indeed refer to ‘secular humanism’ as a ‘religion.” (Justice Antonin Scalia, In Torcaso v. Watkins, (1961)). “To hold that invocations must be nonsectarian would force the legislatures ⋯ and the courts ⋯ to act as ⋯ censors of religious speech. ⋯ Government may not mandate a civic religion that stifles any but the most generic reference to the sacred any more than it may prescribe a religious orthodoxy ⋯" (Justice Anthony Kennedy, Town of Greece, NY, v. Galloway et al, 20140)

Religions are recognizable by their moral and ethical tenets, by terse example: clothe the naked, feed the hungry, house the homeless, finance the indigent, aide the sick and otherwise afflicted, regulate religious sacraments such as marriage, and aide and abet human sacrifice to the gods of pleasure and life style. Religions are also recognizable by their dogma canons outside the laws of nature and of nature’s God (Declaration of Independence - absolute law such as gravity, physics and that which concerns life, liberty and property).

Mike, Norwalk

The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land with its swamp rats is currently demonstrating the accuracy of this sound bite. The type of control is over commerce and religion that is not part of the demonic collective.

Mike, Norwalk

By extremely terse example, a license is:

A privilege or “A right given by some competent authority to do an act, which with out such authority would be illegal.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)

“A personal privilege to do some particular act or series of acts -- by competent authority --, without such permission would be illegal, a trespass, a tort, or otherwise not allowable.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition)

“The permission, by competent authority to do an act which without permission, would be illegal, a trespass, or a tort.” (People vs. Henderson, 218 NW.2d 2, 4).

By way illustration and not by way of exculpatory legalisms’ res judicata limitation(s): A Constitutionally expressed / defined “Title of Nobility” was/is: “To confer a title of nobility, is to nominate to an order of persons to whom privileges are granted -- It is not necessarily hereditary, and the objection to it arises more from the privileges supposed to be attached, than to the otherwise empty title or order.” (Horst v. Moses 48 Ala. 129, 142 (1872)

Unconstitutional Titles of Nobility include: driver, husband/wife, contractor, doctor and lawyer. When did the religious sacrament of marriage between consenting adults become illegal that a third party competent authority needed to sell the privilege of not being prosecuted for acting within such illegal activity? Those that perceive the more licenses they have, the more free they are, are delusional in their disgust for individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and "the laws of nature and of nature's God. (Declaration of Independence).

Mike, Norwalk

One has to either smile or cry at how the entirety of the subject matter here has so exponentially expanded.

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.