Waffler, Your enslaving lies, promoting your occupying statist theocracy infesting this land is a shallow religious propaganda with enthralling dogma and canons. I have at ad nauseam addressed each of your here lies and enslaving points. First, there is NO law making body in the de jure States united (men are not gods, men can NOT create law; - executive, legislative and judicial branches have no ability, right or power to create or amend law!)! The founding lawful premise of the de jure States united is found in the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence — “the laws of nature and of nature’s God”. The framers and founders declared the reasons why sovereigns within the Colonies separated themselves from the U.K.'s legal positivism / carnal man’s philosophies. Again, at the top of the list within the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence; that which separated those within said bounded nation from all others was the “laws of nature and of nature’s God”.

The law of nature is a body of absolutes (mathematics, physics, science, etc.) Natural law is an observation of nature's law and other activities. The nation's founders and framers created most of the Constitution from natural law's observations of nature's law. Such nature's law / natural law offers corporeal persons (individually and/or in concert)  ability to create codes, orders, regulations, rules, statutes, etc. (such are not laws) to best define and administer those laws of nature that already exist (again, man can NOT create law, man can only create despotism and tyranny).

The framers and founders acted to create a “guarantee … republican form of government" (Article IV, Sec. 4, U.S. Constitution) at nature's law (the only time the word guarantee shows up in the Constitution). The Constitutional allowances to change the Constitution was to add to, amend or otherwise enhance administration of individual sovereign’s inalienable rights and liberty at nature’s law. AND, government has NO rights, it has duties only (please give me a definitive legalism / a lawful definition that states what a right “IS” and how it expands beyond a sensorial being, you CAN NOT). The caveat, qualification and explanation of law, in the de jure States united is found in that document that states why the individual sovereigns (heirs to the Eternal King) separated free royal family members from carnal man’s usurpations and enslavement (the Declaration of Independence). AND Waffler, I do absolutely reject your enslaving religion’s dogmas and canons! ! !

Waffler, please give us the name of yout referenced study. Probably just another government induced white paper demonstrating that the occupying statist theocracy that you genuflect to is superior to all other religions.

🤪 I like it a lot 🙃 the "Woke" way.

🙃😁

Waffler, I too would be grateful for a "system of law". Where do you suppose we look for such "labyrinthine". The despotic and tyrannous statist theocracy now infesting this land does not qualify as such a system but rather, a totalitarian enclave of master/slave relationship where men's philosophies of religious canon control.

Waffler, your canned communist retort is worse than just empty. You remember our discussions on Katrina. You socialists sat around drinking beers while you waited for government to address the disaster. I, with a church group went to help in Katrina's devastation from hundreds of miles away while the wind was still blowing. When I arrived, some church groups were already there. Many more church and lay groups showed up shortly thereafter. It was almost a week before government anything made its presence known. There were even medical teams from religious based universities (multiple of hundreds of miles away) there before government showed up. The relief structure was well established and well organized before government ever showed up. AND ! ! ! how about "epidemic of a contagious disease? Remembering governments' debacle of the Covid issue is legendary. Masks were a facade that were ineffective, churches were denied congregants while immoral activities were encouraged. People died because non-traditional medicines were poo-pooed by government (media, pharmaceutical, politicians, etc.) 

Robin Hood, obviously, by your larceny ridden nom de plume, you are a low IQ thief that can not address the subject matter at hand but must, reduce yourself to ad hominems. What about government usurping responsibility for people from nature's law, magnifying individual's in mass rejecting responsibility for themselves do you object to?

A.R., Jerry's reference above fits well your's and the communists comments above — ad hominems do not address the subject quote.

anonymous, that / your statement has been absolutely proven wrong over, and over, and over again. The fascism, communism and atheistic religions in harmony with other woke religions carrying the flag of hate and destruction are not being carried by Christians! Christians, individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and nature's law are all under assault by fascists, communists and religionists (such as the Woke and other immoral and mentally abnormal).

austin gant, what's a load of crap?

Waffler my friend, please read in context then, get back to me without trying to promote a lie, despotism, slavery and usurpation.

Waffler, at law, the government has NO rights, but DUTIES only. The Constitutional premise of "the laws of nature and of nature's God" is that basis at which all de jure laws and Constitutional Amendments must comply or the "guarantee a republican form of government" AND, the Constitution exist no more. Even when instituting the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto into the Constitution, it must lawfully be interpreted by nature's law.

Waffler, anciently / historically / scripturally — faith and belief are two different things. It may accurately said; belief(s) and doubt(s) are opposites.

We hold this truth to be self evident. Concerning the soul in a political arena; there was once far, far away - in a time long forgotten, an intended republican form of government administered by sovereigns at the law of nature and of nature'e God. But alas; the noble heirs to the Eternal King opted out, conforming to the occupying statist theocracy infesting the land with its stealing the royal family's finer senses, leaving only a transgressed and shallow lethargy.

RBESRQ, you're current / admitted religion is the greatest applicator of slavery and the most destructive activism to individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law.

Theft is a breach of nature's law whether it be the stealing of an office or a purse. Within a de jure States united it has been decided to grade larceny; i.e., petty theft, grand larceny, etc. Stealing a purse could be considered petty theft. Stealing an office should be considered grand theft.

(-; 🤪 ;-) ok

We hold this truth to be self evident !

Waffler, how do you define law? The de jure States united was to be free as it chose "the law of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence)  The law you enslave your brothers and sisters with is an unconstitutional "legal positivism".

We hold this truth to be self evident !

Trust? Is that a degree or level of knowledge? I think in the overall context the quote seems to be given, an accurate statement.

The occupying statist theocracy now infesting this land is a testament to the accuracy of the statement.

I remember this quote, I didn’t know how to rate it. The stars and comment was for the first sentence. The second sentence brings out the socialism in ole Roosevelt. “Efficient service to the public” ? ? ? WHAT ? ? ? The referenced “republic” is a government of nature’s law with representation being thereto (NOT serving the public). Please lawfully define “right”. Either man’s rights are inalienable at the law of nature and of nature’s God; OR, how are rights lost or nonexistent if a persons votes for a dishonest individual? ? ?

I like it a lot; ain't that the truth 😁 ! ! !

spot on