[1-25] of 8621

Posts from Mike, NORWALK

Mike, NORWALKMike, NORWALK
Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Waffler, Smith (9/17/20)

Waffler, your supportive patronage of the totalitarian statist theocracy infesting this land is a demonstrative exposé in a hatred of individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and the "laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence). The de jure States united was based on secular applications of natural law. The carnal government may be your religion, not mine.

Religion is: a sacrosanct object of conscience (an ethic(s), a moral(s), a value (system) or an orientation of correctness / enlightenment) believed sufficiently conventional as to enable an attributable action(s). Religion’s initiating elements of conscience, through fruition of action, encompasses self-obligated pursuits, imperative practices and devoted interests (by way of extreme brevity / example: safety, health, fairness, life style acceptance, monetary equality vs. equality before the law, and well being). A ‘god’, ‘causation’, or other ‘relegated source’ of such enabling elements may or may not be instrumental (or even useful) in defining religion. (by way of example: Buddhism, Taoism, societal ethics and Humanism are religions without a god or other extra human manifestation). When a god is implemented into a religion it is to justify and make sense of the conventionally held ethics, morals and beliefs.

Religion is: “ real piety in practice, consisting in the performance of all known duties to ⋯ our fellow men.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) This definition’s focus is on “real piety in practice” - and - “the performance of all known duties” - again, a sacrosanct object of conscience believed sufficiently conventional as to enable attributable actions (socialism or democratic socialism are destructive economic systems in and of them selves – not religion; BUT! ! !, when socialism is forcibly implemented by reason of ethics, morals, orientation of correctness, real piety in practice or, felt/believed sufficiently conventional as to enable performance of all known duties to a fellow man, socialism becomes a religion).

Webster's New World Dictionary - Fourth College Edition uses a slightly different vantage on Bouvier’s “fellow men” by stating, Religion is: “a.) any specific system of belief and worship, often involving a code of ethics and a philosophy [the Christian religion, the Buddhist religion, etc.] b.) any system of beliefs, practices, ethical values, etc. resembling, suggestive of, or likened to such a system [humanism as a religion] ⋯ any object of conscientious regard and pursuit.”

“we did indeed refer to ‘secular humanism’ as a ‘religion.” (Justice Antonin Scalia, In Torcaso v. Watkins, (1961)). “To hold that invocations must be nonsectarian would force the legislatures ⋯ and the courts ⋯ to act as ⋯ censors of religious speech. ⋯ Government may not mandate a civic religion that stifles any but the most generic reference to the sacred any more than it may prescribe a religious orthodoxy ⋯" (Justice Anthony Kennedy, Town of Greece, NY, v. Galloway et al, 20140)

Religions are recognizable by their moral and ethical tenets, by terse example: clothe the naked, feed the hungry, house the homeless, finance the indigent, aide the sick and otherwise afflicted, regulate religious sacraments such as marriage, and aide and abet human sacrifice to the gods of pleasure and life style. Religions are also recognizable by their dogma canons outside the laws of nature and of nature’s God (Declaration of Independence - absolute law such as gravity, physics and that which concerns life, liberty and property).

Mike, Norwalk

The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land with its swamp rats is currently demonstrating the accuracy of this sound bite. The type of control is over commerce and religion that is not part of the demonic collective.

Mike, Norwalk

By extremely terse example, a license is:

A privilege or “A right given by some competent authority to do an act, which with out such authority would be illegal.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary)

“A personal privilege to do some particular act or series of acts -- by competent authority --, without such permission would be illegal, a trespass, a tort, or otherwise not allowable.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition)

“The permission, by competent authority to do an act which without permission, would be illegal, a trespass, or a tort.” (People vs. Henderson, 218 NW.2d 2, 4).

By way illustration and not by way of exculpatory legalisms’ res judicata limitation(s): A Constitutionally expressed / defined “Title of Nobility” was/is: “To confer a title of nobility, is to nominate to an order of persons to whom privileges are granted -- It is not necessarily hereditary, and the objection to it arises more from the privileges supposed to be attached, than to the otherwise empty title or order.” (Horst v. Moses 48 Ala. 129, 142 (1872)

Unconstitutional Titles of Nobility include: driver, husband/wife, contractor, doctor and lawyer. When did the religious sacrament of marriage between consenting adults become illegal that a third party competent authority needed to sell the privilege of not being prosecuted for acting within such illegal activity? Those that perceive the more licenses they have, the more free they are, are delusional in their disgust for individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty and "the laws of nature and of nature's God. (Declaration of Independence).

Mike, Norwalk

One has to either smile or cry at how the entirety of the subject matter here has so exponentially expanded.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk E Archer, NYC (9/2/20)

Archer, (-; Okay ;-) there is that !

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Waffler, Smith (9/2/20)

Waffler, so typical of an anti-inalienable right / liberty / individual sovereign agent of despotism, by profession enforcing the 2nd plank of the communist manifesto. You demonstrate the obvious misconception most collectivists make. Individual sovereigns uniting in an action do not diminish that which is inalienable or an inherent faculty of birth, it in fact expands or multiplies the manifestation. You continually explain how Star Wars Borg is the ultimate utopia and the reality of joining with others is giving up rights and liberty oops, its not. The "socialized" group in a representative republic at "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) is simply individual sovereigns enjoying, respecting and relating to each other's inalienable rights, liberty and natural law expressions.

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Waffler, Smith (8/26/20)

Waffler, there is no government working under the original Constitution, its laws or its principles. The freely elected are jail keepers of the occupying statist theocracy infesting this land. The de jure body politic of We The People ensuring and enlarging individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence) does not exist. Political jailers are taking a hard left into full blown communism (complete with anger, hate, violence, murder, pain, debauchery, destruction, poverty and chaos).

Mike, Norwalk
  • 1
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Joe, Rochester, MI (8/21/20)

“Charity is no part of the Legislative duty of the government.” (James Madison) The dole / welfare is an issue of religion, NOT! a secular body politic. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land has weaponized welfare to justify theft from We The People, break down the family, dull the noble being's senses and destroy the de jure Representative Republic (representing individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at "the laws of nature and of nature's God" (Declaration of Independence)). Such theocratic endeavor is an ugly war on honor, principle and virtue. Charity and welfare in a a religious setting is a most noble endeavor for both giver and recipient.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (8/21/20)

In the de jure States united the order of political efficacy was to be the body politic (government) was to live (function) under every decent man while representing each and ever, any and all of We The People's individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty - at the laws of nature and of nature's God (Declaration of Independence). The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land, as an overlord / carnal god, exemplifies the reality of the meme's message.

Mike, Norwalk

"I'm grateful for the friends I have and the enemies I've made." (Ezra Taft Benson, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture)

Mike, Norwalk

In a legitimate body politic that serves as employees to individual sovereigns united, the only honest function thereof is to represent the inalienable rights and liberty at natural law that is equal to each and every, any and all of humanity's members. The whole art and science thereof consists in being honest.

Mike, Norwalk

A major measuring stick here would be "what" was done wrong or "what" mistakes were made. If a life is spent enslaving, murdering and other heinous crimes doing nothing would have been much better.

Mike, Norwalk

Since the playbook has gone through so many refinements, it is thought that it should work well in Amerika. The ecclesiastical propagators (MSM) announce the summer of love and peaceful protest. Books and Bibles are being burned in Amerika while Christian churches are being blown-up in China. Amerka's Red Guard (antifa, BLM, academic progressives, etc.) proclaim no clear definition of their ultimate end goal.

Mike, Norwalk

WOW, welcome to Amerika history repeating itself.

Mike, Norwalk

Okay a blood lust is hard to manage once the feeding frenzy has begun.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Anonymous, Reston, VA US (8/5/20)

The "A" from Reston, how about the radical religious left (Antifa, BLM, etc.)! ???  And yes, those robber barons are all criminals and the US based radical religious left (communists, fascists, progressives, socialists, collectivists, malignant malefactors all) has taken over the government.

Mike, Norwalk

That such a sentiment was alive today. Criminal religionists (socialists communists, fascists, progressives, etc.) now control with out conscious; AND, they do not even have it in them to entertain natural law's life, liberty, inalienable rights or individual sovereignty. The occupying statist theocracy infesting this land / the macabre death cults killing mind / heart / prosperity have no shame in their methodology of carnage, chaos or destruction.

Mike, Norwalk

I hope there is such person(s) in the current body politic that recognizes individual sovereignty, inalienable rights, liberty, natural law and is of the highest human nature that individual(s) just seems to be hidden.

Mike, Norwalk

One of those eternal truths that can not get enough stars to do it justice. It has taken time to begin to realize an application of such eternal principle / truth. Now, malefactors are once again segregating We The People in efforts to re-impose inequality, dependency on carnal gods (collectivism vs. independent), loss of individual sovereignty, non-recognition of inalienable / unalienable rights, slavery vs. liberty and a system of hate, anger and violence.

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Robert, northwest GA (8/1/20)

Robert, concerning the latest current affairs; starting an EXTREMELY ! ! ! terse list, freedom lost due to liberal action is: lock-downs, mandated masks, enslaving expansion and over reach of the 10th plank of the communist manifesto, increased threat to the 2nd Amendment, freedom of assembly / church / religion's non-allowance (while terrorists are unchecked during such hateful malefactor's burning bibles), freedom to choose medicines that will prevent or cure the current plandemic and freedom of expression throughout the MSM, etc., etc., etc.; AND, freedom of assembly does NOT include terrorists torching property or people being molested or the killing of people and commerce, etc.

Mike, Norwalk

"Law" is a very ambiguous philosophy as relates to carnal man's applications, categories, ideologies, credos and theories. At corporeal or eternal justice, what causal definitions would call for a capital effect?

Mike, Norwalk
  • Reply
Mike, Norwalk Mike, Norwalk (7/30/20)

As an addendum and further explanation; The media / news agencies' right and left sides are administrative difference that fall within a socialist domain. Libertarian perspectives have been hijacked by academic theorists from the right and the left. Individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and organic liberty are not within the media's theocratic heart/mind sets, dogma or vocabulary. Within an unbiased news platform, isms would not have a place in precise reporting of events and facts. The right and left sides are also emphasized by simply arranging an order of presentation and the number of times certain information is referenced. In agreement, there is no free press today.

Mike, Norwalk

Rights i.e., inalienable rights include “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, ⋯ or the right of the people peaceably to assemble ⋯” (Bill of Rights I) Privacy would here include the inalienable right to express without outside third party interference. If Congress has not passed it (rule, statute, edict, etc.) the "executive can not act on it and the judiciary can not address it! ! ! The occupying statist theocracy (establishment of religion) now infesting this land, being an anathema to natural / common law, inalienable rights and liberty, displays its demonic doctrine by restricting or otherwise closing competing religious expressions while allowing its churches (abortion clinics, casinos, privileged intoxicant vendors, etc.) to remain open.

Mike, Norwalk

Our time has nothing to say? Is the time here referenced an inorganic measurement or, a reference to current affairs? The tremendous trumpet (MSM, governments, technology, etc.) is currently a blare of calling evil good, and good evil; putting darkness for light, and light for darkness; and, putting bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! A true criticism of our time, where to begin?

Get a Quote-a-Day!

Liberty Quotes sent to your mail box daily.