If the populous was reasonable, restrained, and mature, wouldn't that be controversial, for did not those around her crawl, as she held herself?

I would like explain I believe in guiding principles as opposed to laws. This idea makes everyone capable and responsible for their initiation and enactment. 

I don't think I agree with Mr Locke here. The importance should be put on flexible minds and not inflexible laws with the vastness and complexity of the impending universe demanding our attention: progressive procedures will eventually cause everyone, everyone to eventually assume legislative capacity and responsibility. Democracy demands on all us to contribute.

It would be good to get all the natural processes of natures call.

It is the mega retail pirates that are the source of the problem not our small little salaries.

Yes, we need our legislature to start passing price controls on the retail pirates. Even price reductions so individuals can dine and produce.

It is this unrestrained attitude that is the source of these rising prices. We need prices restraints and price reductions immediately.Democracy has spoken.

We don't need more toys or toying. We need ideas, ideas, ideas. We need ideas, because the idea of civilization has not even registered on the minds of convention. 

Sounds like childishness. We are human beings. We have little in common with the consciousness of a predatory lions or mindless sheep. Our natural assignment is to raise the status and resilience of life itself. We don't need the incessant roars of foolishness, we need ideas.

It would be quite logical to try democracy before we can afford to be critical of its effects. The children are going to have to grow up first before we can say anything about the theory of democracy.

This is a correct thought.  The interconnectedness of the life process requires all life to shed itself of disease and think in harmony to enable growth and progress.

This quote, I'm sorry, doesn't make much sense, the understanding of conscience is that it prevents you from "riding roughshod" over others. Most of the Planet's individuals displays, due to self centered selfishness, no conscience. The mature well rounded developed individual has the mentally healthy device of conscienceness.

There is no Socialist leviathan, this is misrepresention as usual, or politics as usual. There is only an individual who is trying to introduce the idea of humanity into an arrangement that is devoid of the concept. Humans do not compete therefore discrediting Mr Paul's assertion. Humanity is a conceptual idea based on cooperation absolutely, let me repeat, absolutely unknown by the childish "competitive" arrangement that exists. With the introduction of humanity you will have cooperation and trust, and the eventual no need for money.

A government guided by life promoting principles is a government of justice.

Alright Mr Archer, good to reach out to you again. I am simply going to say I am the Socialist, and you are free to speak, however, I am going to request you prove your speech content
 Surely you have to agree of the futility of uttering worthless utterances, there must be relevance. You have never been oppressed by the Socialist. I am the only Socialist you've made any contact. The strategy is simply as follows the Social person, hence the Socialist simply places emphasis and intellectual forces on what is true and the best of all possible conclusions and choices will sooner or later arrive. The Socialist will keep challenging the the traditional forces until the changes are finally arrived at. There is no need for violence just persistent and consistent challenging of the traditional forces, the truth will at some time emerge. In real Socialism there is no need for nuclear weapons, not even need for a pea shooter, the truth will reveal the need for no violence because the truth comforts all after much truthful foundational prerequisites.

Mike Norwalk wouldn't agree with me on at least one item. America is the greatest country in the world.  You can be what you are, and I call myself the Socialist and we both get away with it, where else could we accomplish this feat. Humbly I would have to agree with "Sharon" and  "Lewis" that "diversity and opportunity,", "freedom and freedom, let's keep it that way" makes America with ample evidence the greatest country in the world."

Mike Norwalk I believe religion may have initiated some notions of morals but did not have the principled foundation to follow through with their behavior requirements.  Scientific principles are required for full enactment of moral behavior.

Mike, Norwalk, Will Durant explained that ancient Greece's religion prove to be immoral.  Religion has the same common threads that lends reason to conclude that abandoning your own responsibility to the forces of the gods is living in the world of make believe, to make up your own irrelevant behavior as easily as the female makes up her face.

Also, you bratty violent kid, possibly describing some element of the condition is not changing it.

Socialism action is based purely on reason, the most universal prosperous course of action is always the choice of the Socialist advisor.

Beware of the artificial constructions of minorities such as skin color or gender. The minority does not oppress, simply because they are the instrument of the vital life sustaining change.

Liberty is more along the lines of appreciation for others. When we learn to appreciate ourselves we understand the strength of the social responsible human organism and the impending social organizational imperative.

Responsibility is the finally, then we will attain progressive freedoms.

Interestingly enough, it is because the efforts of that revolutionary minority that a country secures it liberties.

The people will educate and the people will learn.