Mr Archer, Hello,  you must have an ideological bases for your creating production, if you're going create anything in the interest of human development. People don't create monstrous weaponry, only unprincipled monsters perform this action. Socialism is real now, and makes real humans and authentic human promotional products.

Wouldn't it be convenient for this fellow to present a concrete example of what he is referencing? What injustice? What situation of a protest?  Could we have more specifics please?

Shouldn't we make preparations for a classless social arrangement

Are wolves, tigers, and lions refusing public opinion?

Correction: Individuals are more free then ever, more protected by laws then ever in the past.  This individual, sorry to say about a deceased individual, was just protecting the pretend world of the Nobel laureate.

The majority does appear to be always wrong, but hopefully the future will provide an enlightened majority.

Individuals are more free then ever, more protected by laws then ever in the past.  This individual, sorry to about a deceased individual, was just protecting the pretend world of the Nobel laureate.

Whether it's your one of kind tattoo, or your outlandish paint design on your automobile you're still really pretty common routine, but when you perform in the honor of civilized behavior you are truly amazing.

Never met anyone who's going their money back on this guarantee. There's just no independent conventional thinking, therefore just plain myth.

PS: Emphasizing the unwilling passenger.

Isn't this just a child's appraisal? The mature adult simply understands this idea of soveinty and compact are just childish complications and the mature adult can instantly and respectfully recognize that the individual with the best solution is the best path. It if serves all, that's the way to go.

Wouldn't be interesting to get a middle passage passenger's opinion, of the slave trade, on this quote?

From the mentally healthy perspective, those absurd maddening claims are probably crys from those in poor mental condition for assistance.

Won't the king ask: what good is it being king if I can't oppress at least the poor tenement owner?

Isn't it the rare individual who manages to control of themselves?  Aren't most, a slave to deception?  For it is not a wicked web we weave when once we practice to deceive?

Mike Norwalk, Sanity is to simply to live life to the fullest, not the phony misrepresenting effort that sadly you and the rest of the conventional populous arrangement represent. Socialism is the vision of social abilities to create.

Is this a case of an individual refusing to surrender responsibility or the refusal to take responsibility, for their life or their actions?

If I understand this correctly this Chinese fellow is describing the existing practices of the majority of individuals on this planet. Agreed.

This is a childish subjective nonsensical display. Sanity is an objective status as plain as left or right, day or night, black or white. The child lives is a biased, selfish, self-centered, make believe world where they uncritical perceive themselves as the center of the universe. For the mentally healthy sane adult the case is the reversed.

The real pertinent question is: can I get a woman?

PS Mike Norwalk, you appear to have spelled my last name wrong.  An obvious attempt to "prove" that I'm the one who lives in the world of delusions.

Mike, Norwalk I thought God kinda looked and acted like George Burns, but it just  turned out to be George Burns just acting. Curses, curses fooled again. Drat, drat, drat.

I humbly apologize but my limitations can only interrupt this quote as an insubstantial pointless nonsensical waste of my time. I guess I'll never be a Heisman trophy winner or Noble prize winner like whatever the title this fellow possesses. Whatever the differences of the two "prizes" I'm not sure, for they both appear to employ the same violent political strategies.

Shouldn't we be a principled being?

Is not the authentic man a bastion, paragon, the living fortification of moral authority and expression?