Shouldn't we be forever seeking the best possible direction of the interest of all and not be ruled by our biases?

Not really understanding this quote, is not "the impartial administration of justice the foundation of liberty?"

If we desire social justice, should we not grant the individual of reason his due acknowledgement?

Isn't democracy a positive social mechanism for discovery?

Isn't where a very confining 31 plus trillion dollar debt dwells my country?

Won't the safety of a nation depend on positive perspectives and views of the leaders?

Should not the pledge be thought provokingly revolutionized to keep up with the growing demands of being an American citizen considering a 31 plus trillion dollar debt?

Correction: What morality can I perform for my country?

Aren't we just in great need of the declarations and actions of a true American patriot?  What morality can perform for my country?

With this thought provoking statement in mind, is Socialism, what Mr Fredrick William Sillik says it is, the vision of social abilities to create? Also, should we not recognize the scope and range of the individual possessing such abilities as opposed to the usual routine conventional procedure of handing problems with mindless violence?

Would you please state your case Mr or lady radical?

Isn't the the true patriot, or gentleman/lady in general, the individual who can conduct all their relationships without the use of firearms or weapons of any sort?

Is this a call for a more impassioned examination of our education process or our systematic arrangement in general?

In a police state aren't most individual's "best" conviction to make you a convict?

You mean we must endure the chains of fatigue in supporting freedom?

21years old, a spy, no stand, no real beliefs, no ideology, do unquestionably what the "authority" utters, did he even have a life to offer or  lose?  If you look ahead at the territories we call the United States of America of 2023, 247 years later, you wonder, did he even have a country?

Call it mourning or contemplation, shouldn't much time, inquiry, and investigation be spent on understanding why this carnage, death, destruction occurred in the first place? Should we continue to behave as foolish, mindless, destroyers or could we possibly humanely respond as rational beings and implement a nonviolent resolution?

Don't the mentally ill believe themselves oppressed by honesty and integrity, loyalty and devotion, law and order, the attributes of mental health?

Shouldn't anything that directs our path be subjected to unbiased, objective, scientific all-inclusive public inquiry?

Don't you think individuals should use proper unbiased analitical componential measurement application in making proper assessment or assessments? 

Shouldn't we have a carefully, thought out planned economic system where everyone is served in an empathetic function?

Shouldn't we at first acquire a home before we discuss what happens if we lose it?  Aren't homes a place of love, understanding, security?  If you'd acquire a circumstance of that description, could anything take it away?

Are not growing, the very characteristic and necessity of life, and progress, the characteristic of the progressive, one and the same?  If you are just lengthening and extending the indoctrination can you call that progress or yourself a progressive? How does this Mr Hanson know so much about indoctrination, sermons, neutered mentality strategies, and institutional overseeing?

Is not President Washington promoting a positive note for the support of immigration and it advantages?

Isn't the heterogeneous path a coherent, attentive strategy?  Can you really assert that president Jefferson, himself, was coordinated, reasonable, unbiased or even coherent in this quote?