All forms of socialism are totalitarian societies with carnal gods (government) and cogs. Each such society eventually collapses in inefficiency — maximizing pain, suffering, violence and demise of man's nobility along the way. The current statist theocracy infesting this land has sufficiently rejected individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law that, its implementation of a most heinous theocratic socialism (organized terror, murder, theft, etc.) will sooner than later, end in a history repeating itself result.

Sillik, where do you get all your canned — circular word salads? Is there a nut house somewhere, where you get to read their billboard? 

Sillik, you are here, the only admitted plural that acknowledges to being a destructive organization. As to who is Hitler's true representative — that would be you. You continually paraphrase his ultimate principles and parrot his quotes. The only differences between the two of you is procedure in securing the same end game / outcome.

Sillik, is that your best Hitler representation? It is pretty good.

Sillik, your delusion is completely false and only serves to promote destructive narratives, lies and slaves.

Only near close — some times. Furries and others don't necessarily identify or want to be known as human beings first. Define the term "decency", "need", ulterior motives, etc. (I am sure, your definitions and mine won't be quite the same).

Sillik, individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law derive from and, are to the single and distinct sentient being. There is NO we (social) without a me (unique person). Compelled compliance of the we (socialism) is usurpation and slavery for the one. If one is self-governing, resulting in prosperity, such does not deter or take away from another's desire to be governed, a slave (socialism) and lazy.

Sillik, AGAIN — your circular word salad without defined terms is an empty valueless expression. You are kinda-sorta almost close to accurate when you reference it is a belief (not reality; — and wrong) that morals and values (non-defined) oppose firearms.

Prosperity: the condition of prospering; success or wealth (Collins Legal Dictionary) Where in that or any definition of prosperity does the meaning extend to a mandatory existence of theocratical socialism? - It DOESN’T! By having to redefine prosperity means you DON’T love prosperity but rather, loath it.

Sillik, you think socialism is good - therefore, you think the mentally ill evil - that being the evil that is socialism is good. Your redesign of words and concepts; such as, it is either each and every / any and all or death is non-sensical / brainless dribble. Your dream of no homeless can only exist in an anti-socialism domain. FYI, looking around and seeing the institutionalized socialism, deprivation, corrupt police and judicial (all government), compelled compliance, victimless crime, government licenses, larceny with impunity (2nd plank of the communist manifesto, funny money, etc.) is a violation of my dream.

Sillik, a couple of questions for you. Why do you think good evil and evil good? Why do you so hate prosperity and freedom?

Sillik, I smile, almost audibly, while shaking my lowered head. I know how you do NOT like accepting reality on its own terms and your need to change definitions of words and concepts attempts to alter reality BUT, it is what it is — in fact, it is a form of mental illness / disorder to think socialism is anything but antithetical to mental health.

A crime is: “an offense against the State ⋯” (Colins Dictionary of Law”) - (The State is an artificial / arbitrary ideology temporally created for administering order. Here, the public phantasm - the “State”, becomes the god that CREATES and GIVES law. Under such perception and execution, the inanimate State takes on the ability to be offended); and, “A crime is an offense against a public law.” (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary) NOT! the law of nature. Socialism exists by defining and enforcing crimes.

Insisting coordinated displays of sophistry is NOT a dignified mature behavior, — it is a despotic statism / authoritarianism.

It all depends on how you define the terms. By example: socialism is an uncouth, vulgar and out of control monster antithetical to freedom. Performing in a refined, decent, dignified manner of control would be an exercise in nature's law through individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty.

Sillik, Happy April 1st, the theocratic socialists' high and holy day. Of course it is uncoordinated from your perspective (you are all about coordinating the police state as the omnipotent god). In a unity of free people, there is no law to enforce (can one enforce gravity, math, murder or theft? — NO!) Tyranny may be enforced by a well run State — immensely advanced in sophistries. 

Socialism is: any of various economic, religious and political theories, philosophies or movements outside nature’s law advocating collective or governmental / religious — ownership and administration of property (real / chattel / sensorial beings, etc.) along with the means of production and distribution of goods. Communism, as an administrative form of socialism holds all religious, private and commercial properties and activities in its / the collective's own name. Fascism extends the State's / Collective's ownership administration through legal persons (corporations, LLCs, etc.).

Waffler, this is the only land that I know of that is to be based on "the law of nature and of nature's God". Here, you take any of my mentioning "We The People" WAY out of context. We The People are not to be the body politic or persons to be represented but rather, the individual sovereigns that hire persons to represent our united / equal inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law.

Sillik, so if I take your circular word salad at face value as written — there is mob mentality or nothing but my sovereign self. WOW, socialism is then a nothing that does not even show up on the scale of existence.  I say hmmm.  Are you including socialism in mob mentality?

(-; Sillik — interesting. Your group think is a void in nothingness (completely lacking in any material reality). Groupthink is a mental onanism that can tangibly in fact, have no associates. Whereas, individual sovereignty allows for no other like minded associates. It is interesting to me at least that you can't possibly notice this contradiction. ;-)

Sillik, I smile great big while shaking my lowered head. Even when you are proven wrong, your theocratic word salad doesn't change.

The individual heir(s) to the Eternal King have rejected their Father by choosing: carnal god law givers foreign to our Patriarch's law of nature, to be chattel instead of individual sovereigns, to be slaves instead of standing in our birth right's inalienable right(s) and to be helots / serfs / vassals instead of noblemen at liberty. The quote is accurate.

Sillik, your here circular word salad is a lie. I am NOT an "all" or part of your desired theocratic enslavement. NO known State is considering my best interest ! ! !  What is best (?) for you is, NOT best for me (we, as are part of that theocratic all you speak of — I'm NOT part).

Sillik, your here lie is an oxymoron.

Sillik, your theocratic rhetoric, couched in circular word salad has no basis in fact, secularism or nature's law. Sillik your redefinition of words, concepts and doctrines does not change fact or law. FYI, at nature's law (Declaration of Independence) we the people (individually or in concert) are not the government ! ! !  Each person, as an individual is a sovereign that hires persons to represent his/her inalienable rights and liberty in a body politic of servants. At nature's law, corporeal man can NOT create law, he/she can only organize rules, as according to "order" (by example; driving on the right or the left side of the road). Sillik, your reference to proceedings and procedures in a theocratic expose of/within a philosophy such as "legal positivism" or "legal realism" is only appropriate for the theocratic patrons of that specific religion (call it government, socialism or otherwise). To make a difference, contribution and a positive contribution to the individual family of man (individually and in concert) is to promote individual sovereignty, inalienable rights and liberty at nature's law. Socialism is diametrically opposed and destructive to that means.

Sillik, hahahaha — lololol — WHAT ? ? ? your circular word salad, attempting to redefine words is only an example of one of your gods: "A lie told often enough becomes the truth" (Lenin) FYI, no matter how you falsely attempt to redefine words, concepts, and otherwise methods of communication — fascism, communism, wokeism are any and all, each and every nothing more than administrative methods of socialism. Socialism (ab initio / telos, from the beginning through fruition) is a collective economic system theocratically enlarged to enslave all chattel specie.