No, example is the school for the kids. The kids simply won't move without an example of something different, "everyone else is a criminal, so I'm a criminal" is the kid attitude. The adult only needs a theory to ignite their inherent scientific curiosity to advance, and that theory typically emanates from their own mind.

Well, I just want to add that a individual commented that if we didn't think that these world elected singing "We are the World," wasn't real we are automatically a hateful person. Sorry, I just don't know if the 
"We are the World" world elected version is real or simulated.  I can't assume either way, I simply don't know. If its real?  Excellent.

Mr Archer, I would have to further clarify, that as far as self government, those who are most themselves are certainly most qualified to make the effective life preserving decisions for us all. There are those who are more inclined to nature's clearly defining role for our species and life in general, this individual is in, reluctantly, but fortunately, in command.

It would seem logical that unification of the source of resources would correlate for the most effective unification of the life processes in general. Why have division in any of the resources allocated? The state and the individual, in the final analysis, are after all one in that they are both pursuing the same goal, life.

The social being believes that the impetus for positive change can be reached in every individual. For as we observe the digitized world's elected and their rendition of  "we are the world, we are the children," we can imagine that the possibility of the lyricist dashing off, we are the universe, we are the adults, may not be as far away as we might think.

Never reasonably thought that any career choice or move was created to confront the subject of "mass dumbness."  The reasonable individual is appropriately concerned with the step by step educational procedure for preparing the fledgling individual being for proper and productive community involvement.

Would personally not presume, initially, illiterate individuals uneducated.  The possibility of not being infected by conformism could prove to be quite productive in such an isolated case. Their wholesome naturalness could, in some instances, could be possibly preserved.

No, Mr Archer, one person is as good and as valuable as any other if the community arrangement is accurately and correctly assembled. All must be eligible to receive the same resource allocated opportunities, even to acquire any remnant or remoteness of the possibility for and of diversity.

Schooling, is like the other scapegoating institutions the public likes to blame, you get out of it, what you put into it.  Voices, not votes, voices.

If we are going to present ourselves to the rest of the universe as a developing civilized species of "promise," we have yet to  find them but you can be sure our honorable alien friends are out there, we are going to have to display ourselves, not with this plainly childish backwards made-up world mind display, but with substance, relevance, and primarily a distinguishing identifiable human adult maturity.

Goodnight Mr Archer.

No, Mr Archer, you are misdirecting, in that it is Mr Ames that is incomprehensible, and I am desperately trying to salvage something from his efforts, as I do with your efforts. Mr Archer, you're just displaying your frequent plain biased aggressive childish insulting. "We are the world, we are the children. La da da dau, la da da dau."

Mr Archer, Mike,, Norwalk, all these officials that are named in Mike's post had a super tremendous resource advantage over the mainstream. In Socialism(social responsibility) no one has more basic resources( housing, "discretionary" allocations, nutrition) than anyone else and so only when this conditions are reached is authentic liberty, Mr Archer, really recognized.  Simply, the more individuals freed, enabled by fair resource allocation, the more realization and appreciation of freedom by all.

Mr Archer, it's always a pleasure to positively connect with you, I enjoy your contributions, although not always agree. Mr Archer, the unification of territories would logically promote the unification of the self, opening a more possibility of self government with which I agree with you is the most effective.  I am a world nation supporter who insists that a simple rational arrangement procedure would create an underpopulation pleasantry, afterall we have an entire universe in which to make our acquaintance. There's simply no sane, as always, reason to eliminate anyone. 

The business world is truly a world of thorough misrepresentation as described here, in this  quote by Mr Holt, where your "protectors" are actually your captors.

The business world tends to lead us in the realm of the make believe and so we lose the grasp of consciousness and retention, knowledge that connects us more deeply, thoroughly, and honestly with our conscious environment has the hefty hold on our minds.

What stands out to me in the field of "higher education" is the endless chatter of grades and grade points and the related classes, but in the regard of any substantial or substantive information being accumulated, exchanged or learned there's a complete and total void by the participating chattering "education" clowns.

A true social activist interprets the constitution and expresses it's meaning and content in a manner that is in the best interest of all life.  The social activist is prepared to install the amending alterations to the constitution for the utmost appropriate social atmospheric preservational balance. 

Not true, we will find those secure words and supporting documentation that will guide us on our path to our destiny and legacy as the species of "promise."

 A world government would be a vital foundational species instillation piece, marking great developmental achievement, enabling individual identity and awareness, promoting comprehensive relational bonds, understanding the true role of the nation state and the realization of its obselescence, also assist in the educational springboard, leading to leaving us free of superstition.

Its appropriately clear in the rational mind that humankind is not naturally criminal. The challenge for the individual is to properly prepare themselves for law-abiding social contributions.

Would we, with proper investigation, find with less policeman a positive correlation of less violence in transactions?

It is irony and contradictory that the notable wordsmith would put his faith and support inline with weaponry then words and laws. We must rid ourselves of weaponry and fine the words and descriptions that can lead us to appropriate orderly behavior.  Reinforce your dictionaries, not your arsenals.

We must concern ourselves with the developing enhancement and broadening of the liberties of the people. 

Constitution,  whether it personal or social, is the instrumentation to assist us to determine wrong and set us on the correct course.