We want to be human beings. We want decency. We want a healthy life style. We need Socialism because we are first and foremost social beings. We want real friends. We need neighbors without ulterior motives. We need good wholesome sincere relationships. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create friendship.

Correction: Firearms support is promoted by none other than those individuals with no substantive values to express. Opposition to firearms have morals and values that they believe will guide them past the violence. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create intelligence.

Firearm support is promoted by none other than the individuals with no substantive values to express. Opposition to firearms have morals and values that they believe with guide past the violence. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create intelligence. 

Correction: Correction: I am in my right mind. It difficult to write with the sun glaring in your phone.

Correct ion: I am in my right mind.

Mr Gaber, no one in their right mind wants anyone killed. I am in my mind. You are not, building nuclear weapons. Partying like it's 1999. Why 2k?  I want the human race to live on and develop into a more evolved species. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create sanity.

It's interesting the kids can express this really uncoordinated idea of immorality, and say absolutely nothing about what is morality itself. Morality is the promotion of life, which by your childish perspective quote Mr Gabor, know nothing about.

The present system is preparing for the extinguishing the remainder of the human race selling the world worthless nuclear weaponry. The present system of conduct is the most immoral. Like I implied about the kids before, never an alternative. It is moral to describe and design a prescription for good moral conduct. You have understand the mistakes of the past before you can carve out the path to survival. Mr Fredrick William Sillik offers you the only alternative, national housing, national transportation, national goods and services. There is simply no other alternative.  Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create morality.

Mike,, Norwalk, I love prosperity, but you must understand everyone must prosper or it opposes the definition. I think evil is evil, a good is good. You don't understand if everyone is not prosperous, the you are condoning death.  All, I mean all life must prosper to be prosperous. There is no homeless in my dream. Look around. We are living your "dream."  No deprivation in my dream at all. Look around. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to enable all to prosper.

Correction: Oh, Mr Archer, I do hear a nonviolent voice, however, because I talk to myself. If I want to ever hear a reasonable perspective, that's the only alternative left to me. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create reasonable individuals.

Oh, Mr Archer, I do hear a nonviolent voice, however, because I talk to myself, a lot. If a want to ever hear a reasonable perspective, that's the only alternative left to me.  Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create  reasonable individuals.

Mr Archer, sorry I can't allow our citizens to be free to kill, crush, and destroy, "the other's view." At present I am aware no responsible individuals, and never hear of any nonviolent directions. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to reveal the violent citizenry to themselves. 

Mike, Norwalk, reality, you want reality? Gravity speed=light speed in a vacuum. 1+1=2, 2+2=4, 4+4=8. Murder is a destructive mental, but alterable, disorder. Theft is a destructive mental, but alterable, disorder. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create reality.

Correction#2: Modern human beings have an advanced awareness of human qualities, the "founders" were greatly retarded in their social development, slave owners, after all. Human beings simply don't acquire slaves. We must release ourselves of the conforming to the "founders" attitude. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create nonconformity and uniformity. 

I agree with the idea that it is the system that is definitely the problem, the solution, however, never availed by the kids, is the revolutionary individual. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create attention to the individual.

The state anti-capitalist? Bravo.

Correction: Modern human beings have an advanced awareness of human qualities, the "founders" were greatly retarded in their in their social development, slave owners, after all. Humans simply don't acquire slaves. We must release ourselves of our "founders" conformist attitude.

To remain in the misguided past is surely inadvisable. The. Constitution is need of tremendous updated amendments. The document must certainly be revised to keep pace with a more rigorous technological world. The founders were certainly not qualified in many respects to make qualified decisions for the contemporary world.  Human beings are more refined now. They have a advanced aware of human qualities, the founders were greatly retarded in their development, slave owners, after all.  Contemporary citizens are much more refined and sophisticated and can revise the document for a more productive nation. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create a human constitutional document.

Mike, Norwalk, greetings and salutations. Its interesting and a little frightening that you can categorize natural processes such as gravity, math with clearly unnatural processes of murder, theft.  Whatever the insinuation, this categorized association would get you a lengthy stay in a mental ward in a just world. Good day. Socialism is the challenge of social abilities to create mental health.

Crime needs to be abandoned.
 

?

Is the insisting of displaying coordinated, sophisticated, dignified mature behavior  "statism, authoritarianism."

Is being an uncouth, vulgar out of control monster freedom? Is performing in a refined, decent, dignified manner control?

Oh by the way Mr Archer, I really don't understand much of what you say, but I really appreciate the sentiment of hope for me.

The correct statement is, its unfortunate for the governments that the population does not think.