No, not groupthink because I believe I am the only qualified PEOPLE, and eventually we will learn that people are just exactly that, people. 
Yes, and very perceptive, excellent,
I do sincerely believe that all of the world 's conventional individuals could join in with all the those famous entertainers in a rendition of the 1985  popular hit song, WE ARE THE WORLD, WE ARE THE CHILDREN, and not be out of place one bit.  I meet absolutely no one, and I mean no one with any adult facilities
Also, good, yes government is exactly like that loving, guiding parent who takes all the responsibility and all the blame for their children's faults and flaws, which I do claim.

All I can respond at this point is I believe in no devil. And not to make you angry Mr Archer, but to pay any acknowledgement to a devil is a pure example of the lack of sound reason.  Our degenerated mentally ill neighbors are, in their poorly educated condition, are quite capable of some very disgraceful activities. Seemingly making some childish made up bad fellow named a devil quite amateurism. No sir, there is no devil, just some severely mentally disordered individuals. I believe I have a very competent mental health function, and could pass an objective mental health assessment, for despite what I'm made to believe 1+1=2.

Mr Archer, I am not going to enter the sex and drug trade like everyone else. Humans are capable of being honest and decent.

We the people of the United States are the government.  The people say you cannot continue to live in your regressive childlike state, as this quote clearly expresses, and not continue to examine and improve your condition. Nothing remains in the state of neutrality.  The people are not interested in laws, but principled manners of educated behavior. The People's government will determine what is in the best interest of all and this will not be a burden to the thoroughly educated for this path will grow in the human and universal developing life promoting functional manner.

Finally, Mr Archer, Evolution is more than an inclination with me.
I am devoted to it because I can't believe the world began with a couple named Adumb and Eval or whatever their name. No, quite logically it appears we arrived from a different species. An apelike creature of some sort, much more of an interesting and conclusive  approach for an individual of my aptitude, as simple as it is. 

And Mr Archer, the criminals are all racist, sexists, violent, pedophiles, and they spend all their time trying to reverse the situation by trying to apply those attributes to me by a made up make believe diversionary strategy, until I enter the world of sex and drug dealing. The criminals have a language of they're own and a signing strategy (they're primitive hunters) that tells them I have bad, by supposedly giving bad signs, intentions when I have no such notion.

Additionally Mr Archer, the criminals are typically not accurate, violent and seem to always believe in God, most of the time.  I believe I'm the only atheist. The other "atheists" are out to be the goat atheists, so after awhile the are back to "born again" after the population arrangement recoils on them. For me, the elimination of supernatural assists in answering my questions.

Mr Archer, I believe human beings, however, are good. Just most, the criminals, have abandoned  their humanity. The criminals are not human. The criminals have degenerated from their human status. If we could regenerate the criminals this would assist the human cause. The human as simple, as I believe I am, does try to strive for accuracy. The criminals are never accurate. The human is pretty much accurate in  expression. 

Interesting, but it would be pleasant, and perhaps ever more enlightening, to have an accompanying example.

I don't understand, she doesn't want or can't believe the offender can benefit from the offended's forgiveness? Wouldn't it be a mutual all pervasive pleasantness if we might believe all benefit from the forgiveness? Not fully understanding this quote possibly, but we are not here to necessarily win the situation but to resolve the problematic circumstance.

Conversely, for ever more health don't underestimate your own capabilities. The strong can get stronger and the wise is willing, if wise, to become more developed and ever more the wiser.

Mr Archer, Science looks to settle the issues as best it can. Its solved a few mysteries.  Sorry, I'm inclined to agree with Carl Sagan's book.  Evolution is not just a theory, it is a fact of life.  Don't know anything about a genome. My interest is in appropriate behavior. Appropriately behaved, I believe human beings can orbit the far away stars. I'm not all impressed with human beings. Humans are a simple creature, not that particular intelligent, but with proper behavior I believe they can be intelligent. Appears almost everyone is a criminal. To properly administer science, we sure could make strides being law-abiding.  I surely don't believe you have to be a criminal to acquire, but I have to admit I've never met anyone who acquired anything much without being basically a criminal. I believe in acquiring abiding by the law. I slept in a one person tent last night, Thanks-giving night. But I do appreciate what I have.

Mike,, Norwalk, At the very heart of science is it's simplicity. The universe is not as complicated as you seem to wish it to be. We are are simple creature ourselves, not all particularly that bright. The vast population appears to worship and glorifies the non-existence from which we came and no doubt has made a non-existent make believe, catch all, be the answer for all they can't answer, named god. We are not all that sophisticated of creature, but hopefully we can someday be of significance.  We are just star stuff with some very limited creativeness, in the context of universal scope and depth.  To be of any significance, we are going to have leave the glorification of death, and its regressive god brain drain. 1+1=2 simply cannot be altered, there is no god, it's as simple as that.

A commendable excellent insight. It leaves one with the idea that to move forward we must forgive. Let us forgive, and go.

The creative individual keeps the hopes and promises of the human race alive exhibiting the constructive ideas and performing the vital functions learned from those ideas.

The Socialist, however, stands on the proposition that there is an appropriate resolution to every problem. There is someone who understands the situation and can solve the basic problems, positively. Murder and mayhem is never the answer.  A rational and reasonable responsible win-win answer can be found.

We can't afford how the world rolls, degrading itself, as it does.
We the people, must guide it in its natural designation.  The new rejenerative direction is going take a lot of effort. The childish games, as all games are childish, must cease, so the honest efforts can begin.

Nonsense, science rules out possibility of any god. We need to give credit to the individual who keeps the American and world hopes alive.

It would be hoped that all would take pride in their various skills and trades and practice them with great honor and integrity.

Simply put, for us non medal of freedom people: We are our perceptions.

My observations reveal contemporary conventional individuals don't think as they wish, and the speaking appears to reflect what they think, nothing.

I personally believe all individuals are equal, but those who do not choose equality are challenging to live with because they're mentally ill.  I personally judge on character but the mentally ill insist on the color of their skin be a perpetual condition of our relations.  The mentally ill continue to insist that their race is a gift from the gods.  The healthy mentally individual insist that race is as environmental adaptation, I do insist on the fact.

We could surely use more sincere kindness in the world.

The progressive stimulant for growing the American atmosphere is an all inclusive National Housing Project, National Transportation Services,
and a National Goods and Services arrangement.

Could anyone convey a pertinent rational purpose for the White House?  It appears it would be a significant advancement to replace the White House with a more progressive and vigorous organizational department for developing the governmental institution.