Why show up at the ballot booth? Let's just not vote and rest assured we didn't support some criminal's ambitions to destroy our country.

The human purpose is abandoned in this whole scenario. The thriving community, not at all described in this quote, desires to become continual cohesive and to grow together in a life promoting/preserving process . The members of a community spend much of their time trying to understand the individual and community needs correlate, so there really is need for a chief administrator. The integrated relationship of individual and community is the guide and fuel for the life promotion process and purpose.

I've never consulted with two wolves or the independent lamb particularly on the subject of Democracy. Never really consulted with your average conventional voter on the same subject, so the difference in analysation skills would be purely assumption on my part.

The national debt, the national debt is 35 trillion dollars. GDP is 29 trillion dollars. Now if we could raise GDP substantially we could pay off the national debt. Now let me take you back to the 1960's and a song who's lyrics sang of the, games people play, never meaning what they say, never saying what they mean, Karl Marx's Dialectical Materialism. If we could repair Dialectical Materialism we could raise GDP substantially by repairing the communication processes problem. If we could get individuals to say what they mean and mean what they say we can repay our debt we owe the world. We cannot continue to try to fix problems with more problems. Socialism is the challenge of socialized behavior to create repayment of the national debt.

Mr Archer, it is you that insist on  an unfair advantage that produces the police, lawyers, and courts. If you distribute the wealth of the environment evenly you will have a harmony of the life process. You, Mr. Archer need crime like everyone I meet because you possess no fair mental processing attribute. The mentally healthy have a fair mental processing attribute and capability. Socialism is the challenge of socialized behavior to create fairness.

Mr Archer, your severe mental disorder won't allow you to admit that you need the police, the lawyers, the courts because your case would not hold up to a rational fair simple conversation. You need the armed and dangerous criminals elements of police and courts in a hope to wear down the messager by attrition or just plaine ole traditional murder. You are extremely sick Mr Archer. Your case of traditional violence can't stand up to reason, and that's all you are and all you have. Socialism is the challenge of socialized behavior to create.

Mr. Archer, no, these formalities are of the conventional initiative. Socialism is the friendly bantering of rational concern. Well grounded down to earth human simplicity is the foundation for justice and adjudication. No, it your conventional insistence on conventional complications and the accompanying inequality that brings the high priced low life lawyers and the always unfair trails. Socialist believe in the redemptive qualities of humans and a agreed upon all participating correction process.

Addendum, your vote means nothing, but your awakened energized principled supported voice means everything.

We must continue to keep in mind of the reassurance in the fact that humankind continues to ride the evolutionary wave to a more resilient preservation and prominent position.

Mr Thoreau supporters I believe Mr Thoreau is grasping at and for the basic element for a community individual unifying principle of life connection. Mr Thoreau is hinting at the very core of our species, the core of the social animal that is our foremost basic characteristic. The individual will be more advanced as Mr Thoreau alludes when he or she realizes their true social identity and its species connecting feature. Mr Thoreau is identifying his Socialistic foundation because Socialism is the challenge of socialized behavior to create. 

The act of voting is a waste of time to obscure the fact that our undereducated/uneducated citizenry can avoid their responsibilities by masquerading that a worthless and meaningless activity, meaning elections, can be of any benefit. We don't need meaningless votes, we need advanced individual and independent reflections and ideas to secure our community preservation and responsibilities.

I'm sorry, but the average adult would ask; why would you want information but for any other purpose but for the best interest of all and the preservation of the forces of "life, liberty, and happiness?"

Despite the seemingly inevitable estrangement of the matrimonial couples they always appear a perfect match. As far as public officials we must learn to have more faith in our own capabilities.

Other than with advocates of democracy, you simply don't have conversations. Hustling Churchill touts are incapable of conversations. The advocate of democracy doesn't have a vote, the advocate has relevant sustainable facts and figures.   

Addendum, those least likely capable of making war are the most prepared for creating peace. Destruction leads to destruction, and creativity leads us to peace.

This is a primitive and misguided, and sorry, pure ridiculous analysis, for those nations most prepared for peace will most undoubtedly feel its tranquil serenity and its audacious eloquence.

This individual's priorities are not aligned correctly. Concepts of justice must have heart. The heart of justice is to fully understand how we are a better and more resilient community as the justified action is being processed. We need time to fully internalize the meaning of the justified action and we can't afford a cheap flimsy dimestore justice.

All firearms supporters have mental disorder, they associate with other firearms supporters with mental disorder, and premeditatedly with ill intent, go out hunting down their fellow citizens for settling their mostly made-up, mentally disordered irrational dispute scores. All firearms supporters are mentally disordered, without any exceptions, and  

Why would someone benefit from saying our coastal cities are in trouble of being submerged in to the sea's, if there's is no possibility?

We are, in this description, in need of a more specificied detailed idea presented of the inappropriate behavior and it's connection. We have a technical idea presented, but what is needed is a more transparent and apparent inappropriate relational behavior involvement and how it effects our overall life sustainability. Please.  

I would like to apologize for my bitter attacks of these political figures, but these figures display  a total demonstration of the lack of faith in human determination, drive, and the educational developing forces that prepares human beings for a more resilient life sustaining challenge. It is not the desirable description, we as socialized beings care to express concerning these political personnel, but we can't continue this negativity of our past elected representatives, we must have a much more penetrating positive stance and not continue these can't be done attitudes, because life can be performed and performed quite glorifyingly. Socialism is the challenge of socialized behavior to create a glorified and distinguished life presentation.

Despite the competing forces, the human being is going to put their faith in human survival as the final arbiter. Not crooked politicians, not the selfish, not perversion, but the beautiful wholesome, enabling, decent, dignified life giving energy, for Socialism is the challenge of socialized behavior to create dignity. 

Only murdering evil savages make use of firearms. To accept any assertion other than this, you are breaking the laws of human survival.

This is the philosophy and legacy of a screw-up, if the formula resolves, it solves the problem, go with it, believe in it. We simply don't have the life span to examine how many formulations don't equal two when we can clearly observe 1+1=2. This is the philosophy and legacy of a screw-up, if the formula resolves, it solves the problem, go with it, believe in it. We simply don't have the life span to examine how many formulations don't equal two when we can clearly observe 1+1=2.

Accusations fly, but never specified. Basically Republicans or Democrats say and do nothing all they same, change/life is too much of a threat.