Government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Mr. Archer.

Formal laws tend to have a quality of favorable bias attributed to them.

Agreed, that government that leads us to our true humanity, allows being ruled by our own hearts and minds will prove most effective.

Human integrity could emerge so effective for sustainment of human endowment that mental health would be quite efficient leading to no need for artificial constructive rules and regulations. Becoming more purely human leads to less necessity of formal rules, because of the natural goodness of the quintessential human being.

Reasonable based freedom will not flounder, if I read my Mr Spinoza correctly.

What would be the label given to this situation?

Who am I to disagree with Mr Baruch Spinoza, an individual described as one of the "lovable" characters of the past.

And would not a good father remind his son the potential of bringing wisdom to the world circumstances?

It's interesting the time they called the "great depression" would not insite curiosity into the circumstances of this "economic upheaval."

Doesn't following the crowd tend to lead us to misfortune?

Is the point here, that we should be more vigilant of misrepresentation and guard against it?

Is it possible individuals have much more influence on the governmental proceedings then they are aware, and are the primary source of these unnecessary burdens placed on them?

To be a free individual is a misnomer. With the varied climate of existence an individual is free corresponding to the circumstances one challenges in the different dimensional  contexts of the differing confinements. Put simply, it is wrong to say one is free, put correctly, one practices to be free.  Put even more transparent, freedom grows as does knowledge and understanding.

Restore or actually initiate that belief in yourself?

The independent individual has my full support.

Where there is the properly educated, there is liberty.

Humans realizes that what is good for them is good for the community, and what is good for the community is good for them.

A diverse populous will be of great assistance in the developmental process of reaching our limitations, and then surmounting and passing to next level of development.

Is this just adding complications to the very simple creature we call the homo-sapien?

Sorry, Mike, Norwalk there will be no creativity in a social setting where a natural classless equality feature is not met or exercised. 

Trying to understand the effectiveness of this quote if I were a mindless drone, and accepted Hypatia's advice, would I state, I would be a mindless drone if it weren't for Hypatia?  

Isn't it the citizens=government doctrine? Are not the restrictions and exactions put in place so the political infants are controlled by the more experienced political juveniles?

It is the  well-disposed, industrious, and decent man who changes that state in the final analysis. No one else is going to make those needed changes.

Is it not our responsibility to harmonize with the state and respond positively to the state in order to change it?   Can we sit childishly, idlely by and just criticize, or do we respond responsible?

Correction: Mr Archer,  Hello, you must have an ideological bases for your creation productivity, if you're going to create anything in the interest of human development. People don't create monstrous weaponry only unprincipled monsters perform this action. Socialism is real now, and makes real humans and authentic human promotional products. Thank-you